Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC want a signed letter


mimic51
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5640 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wrote to HSBC for my CCA on my credit card and they sent the cheque back and a letter saying they would be happy to do this for free but need me to sign the letter so they can verify its me that is writing.

 

I sent the letter back with my signiture on it have I made a mistake?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly. There is no requirement for you to give them a signature to receive a copy of the agreement. It has been known for some companies to copy and paste signatures onto an agreement - although I am in no way saying that HSBC will do this.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right guys next chapter.

 

HSBC have sent a letter back saying that they have compiled everything I asked for but have sent a black CCA saying that Section 78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 requires us to privide a copy of the Executed Agreement if any. Regulations 3 (2) of the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulation 1983 allows that certain items may be omitted from such copies, including the signature box and signature.

 

Therefore the copy of the executed agreement we must supply a copy, but need not be a photocopy, of the signed Agreement.

 

They have sent me the terms 6 years ago and then the current terms.

 

The CCA is completely blank with not a shread of my details on it.

 

So what do I do now stop paying my monthly payments or carry on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may have complied with the specific requirements of s.78(1), but they can't enforce without the original executed agreement. HSBC know this - the letter they've sent is a standard 'we've been rumbled' template.

 

When this happened to me I stopped paying, and asked them to confirm that they did not have an original agreement. Ultimately they gave up, but not without a stream of silly 'final demand' letters.

 

Their next move is a template saying that they can pursue it because their grandly-titled 'Legal Dept.' says so. Risible nonsense, like everything else they send out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ol will do that! Be nice to have some cash in my pocket for Christmas although have budgeted at £20 per person as I am not as stupid with my money anymore and being on a shoe string has brought out my talent for saving money and finding sites like this great one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have now received two letters from HSBC saying that they need only send a blank CCA out and not the original and saying that this is final what letter should I send them next I am not sure as have sent them the last letter twice saying I want a signed copy of the CCA.

 

Help Please

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on the reason why you requested a CCA in the first instance.

 

IF you wanted to know what the terms and conditions apply to your account today, then you'vr probably got all you can expect. Personally, I think HSBC's intrepretation of the regulations is wrong but I do not see the point of pushing the matter to a court.

 

If you wanted to see a copy of the agreement that you signed because HSBC threatened legal action, then I would say the next step is up to HSBC.

 

As has been stated above, if HSBC take legal action, they will have to produce a true copy in court. HSBC know this but I suspect that even when they know they do not have an agreement, they still try it on because many people give in to their bully boy tactics. If they do come up with an enforceable CCA, then that is when you negotiate terms for repayment.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a Subject Access Request

 

Hi I agree with Ross-co by sending for a copy of all documents held in your name they have to include a copy of your agreement as this request is made under Data Protection Act regs not CCA regs.

 

I used this with three creditors and it felled them all after the normal blank agreement responce.

 

It also gives you details of any charges to reclaim if the do come up with an enforcable agreement.

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same issues with 3 major high street banks. I followed this procedure:

 

1) CCA. Got photocopies of booklets and not signed agreements.

2) Sent DPA specifically asking for the signed agreement

3) Sent formal request for a copy of the signed agreement under Civil Procedure Rules 31.16 warning them that I will apply to court for pre-action disclosure of the signed-agreement if they do not send me the signed agreement.

 

Lo and behold two of them sent me copies of the signed agreements and the third phoned to say they will sent it today.

 

The two I got were archived in microfiche, illegible and without any prescribed terms. No wonder why they were quoting the copy regulations! they are unenforceable!

 

Keep going, you will get the copy you need in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...