Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Had a letter response today dated 12/6/24 from PRA Group re request for information consumer credit act 1974. Confirming they are in receipt of my CCA letter request - and that they are requesting the required information. They returned the £1 postal order. And my CCA letter. Stating that they will contact me with an update ASAP. They attached/included a standard ( non personal ) page about ' what they should provide ' and ' what happens If I don't get this information'.    I need to file my defence by 21 June 24. Any suggestions as to what that defence should be ?   
    • Thanks @dx100uk for responding promptly.    To be quite honest with you, applying for breathing space might not really help except some short term relief. I don’t want to default either as I might lose my job too and I cannot really afford it. Sorry for sounding bit stupid but is there something I can do to stop them charging interest and agree on reduced payments? I am working on information that @BankFodderhas requested and will be sharing it later today.  
    • who said send the sb letter to RC anyway? we said the debt owner not the grease monkey.
    • Thanks guys. Received a letter today from Resolvecall to say that I have been removed from their files and my account has been closed, it continues to say that I maybe contacted in future by Intrum or another debt collection agency. Do you think it’s worth finding Itrums address and sending them the same letter? Thanks in advance 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Rbs Have Admitted They Cant Find My Cca - Can I Stop Paying?


Guest flubdub
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5667 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

can anyone help. i have been in receipt of a letter from debt managers closing my account after i sent them the data protection act subject to letter. they said they cannot send me copies of my financial records etc. as i stupidly paid them monies before this i am wondring whether i can demand a refund from them as they have no proof for me regarding thsi debt. am i in my rights to ask????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest flubdub

Received this reply of OFT today;

Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act)

Complaint Against: The Royal Bank of Scotland plc

Licence No:

Thank you for your email received on 20 November 2008. Your email has been forwarded to us by the Credit Guidance Team. I apologise for the delay in responding to you.

I am very sorry to hear about the difficulties you have been experiencing however, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has no authority to become involved in disputes between consumers and traders and so we cannot offer you any direct help with the complaint or advise you directly in this matter. Our role is to protect the collective interests of consumers.

 

The above mentioned Act established a licensing system to protect the interests of consumers in the credit area. If a business wishes to undertake the collection of debts that arise from consumer credit agreements then the Act states that they are required to hold a consumer credit licence; this is issued by the OFT. The above trader holds a consumer credit licence. Under the Act, the OFT has a duty to consider the fitness of all traders who hold consumer credit licences.

In considering fitness we take into account whether a business has engaged in improper business practices. Where we receive complaints about the business practices of licensees, we investigate them and where appropriate we take enforcement action; that action depends on the evidence and circumstances. Action the OFT can take includes revoking, refusing or suspending a licence; or placing conduct requirements on the licence of the company or business in question (failure to comply with a conduct requirement can result in a financial penalty being levied).

 

The OFT has issued guidance to consumer credit licence holders engaged in the debt collection industry. The guidance is intended to ensure that debt collectors treat debtors fairly. Non-compliance with this guidance will call into question the fitness of licence holders and applicants. You can view our guidance at: www.oft.gov.uk/advice_and_resources/resource_base/legal/cca/debt-collection.

 

We have noted the details of your complaint, and we will consider this alongside any other complaints we have received with a view to any licensing action we may decide to take. Unfortunately, we cannot disclose any details about any action we may take, due to restrictions on the OFT relating to disclosure of information (Part 9 of the Enterprise Act 2002).

 

Providing copies of agreements regulated by the Act

 

As you may know, s63 of the Act covers how and when lenders must provide consumers with a first (and where appropriate second) copy of a regulated agreement. It is clearly in the lender’s best interests to retain details of the original agreement and any subsequent variations or changes made to it, particularly as consumers can request a subsequent ‘true’ copy of most types of agreement under ss77 and 78 of the CCA (and on payment of the appropriate fee). There are rules about what is likely to constitute a ‘true copy’ under these sections of the Act. Further, if a consumer does make a valid request for a copy of their agreements under these provisions and the lender does not comply with the request, the agreement may not be enforceable in the Courts, subject to any other mitigating factors.

 

Should you require specialist advice or assistance on the circumstances of your complaint (including in relation to the above provisions about copy requirements), you may wish to contact your local Citizens’ Advice Bureau or seek advice direct from a legal advisor.

 

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) can help with most complaints about consumer-credit products and services if the consumer has failed to satisfactorily resolve the matter directly with the financial institution itself. FOS can be contacted at: The Financial Ombudsman Service, South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London, E14 9SR; telephone number, 0845 080 1800, or www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk.

You may also find it helpful to contact the Consumer Credit Counseling Service for advice on 0800 138 1111 or visit their website at www.cccs.co.uk.

 

I hope this information proves to be useful to you.

 

 

Thank you again for writing to us and bringing this matter to our attention.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Samit Patel

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest flubdub

Ok, its now got more complicated and Im worried. I think the bank is getting confused because there are two loans. I sent the letter saying "I find it hard to believe you can lose such an important document, etc, etc", and today I received a reply that I had to sign for! It said "Further to my letter to Stephan Brennan they have located the CCA for loan account number "A" [we'll call it :)]. And it all looks correct, but the amount is wrong. Loan A is for £5000, and loan B is for £6700. They say this is the CCA for loan A, but on the cca it says £6700. It also has our old address on, and at the date it was signed, that address would be correct.

 

HOWEVER

The CCA that they sent a few weeks ago that had someone elses signature on, was for the same amount, but had our CURRENT address on.

Ok, so the cca theyve sent us looks legit, although I'll have to check the date because im sure we go it when we lived here, not our old place. And why have they go the account numbers mixed up again? Also, now they have a copy of my signature, will they paste it onto a cca for the £5000 loan? How would I prove it if they did?

 

Its confusing. Im confused and I think the bank is too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...