Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

court papers received re: HFC


elliesnan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5543 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all have a thread about this in the General Debt forum but am not getting any help there so l'm starting one here. HFC loan taken out 10 years ago been making payments of £5 a month for many years! CCA request sent and agreement sent back it would seem to be in order as advised on my thread in the other forum. Recently the debt has been moved to a solicitors called Restons who very quickly rejected our monthly payments and lo and behold the court papers have arrived! There is £3629 IN PPI which we want to dispute plus there are bound to be charges in there as well. I understand that l need to send something like a CPR 18? is that right. Have just over a week to submit the defence papers so PLEASE can someone help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Eliiesnan.....firstly can you post up here the Particulars Of The Claim ? (don't be too specifici with the figures)

 

Secondly you have 14 days to acknowledge the claim (are you sure you only want to defend part of it ?? - Have they provided any compliant default notices ? notices of assignment ? full statements for the duration ? (excessive charges)

 

After acknowledging the claim you have a further I think 14+3 days in which to submit a defence...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Firstly have you received a default notice from HFC ?

 

You can do the AOS online here https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/csmco2/index.jsp

which will give you 28 days from the date on the CCJ form to get a defence together

 

I would Acknowledge service and state that you intend to defend the whole claim.

 

You will then need to send a CPR 31.14 letter ( Courtesy of x20 ) to Restons. ( read the thread and amend as neccesary ).

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/159445-getting-them-reveal-their.html

 

Send this letter at least Recorded Delivery.

 

It may help further if you can scan or type up the POC of the claim (exclude all personal details, account no's etc.). Also if you do have the Default Notice then please post up.

 

Also, search through the forums, there's plenty to read about the actions of Restons\HFC, Restons and HFC.

 

Sorry can't advise further about the reclaiming of the PPI but I sure someone more knowledgeable will be along.

 

Any questions, just ask.

 

Hope this helps.

Edited by supasnooper
Corrected details. And can't type as quick as 42man

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

l am a little confused about the CPR letter to send ( far too clever for me) l am obviously leaving out the part asking for the CCA as they have sent me that so am l using the rest ommiting the part about it being under 5k? is that right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put the part requesting the CCA back in.

Look at your POC on the CCJ, this is what they wish to rely on.

 

And use the rest of the letter omiting the part about it being under 5k

 

REMEMBER, don't sign it and post Recorded Delivery Service.

 

Finally, take your time to understand the CPR31 letter and the relevant laws, this is your case and the better you know it, the better chance of success.

Read some other threads to give yourself an idea of what will happen next and the timescale involved and of course pick up some invaluable tips as well.

 

Good Luck.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of Claim

The Claiment claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant under a contract dated on or about 21/03/1997 in the sum of 12k ish( my words)

 

The contract they refer to is your Credit Card Agreement.

 

Also, Please can someone help with the reclaiming of the PPI element as I have no experience of this.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou your a star Please click on the link and see what you think CPR request all done and ready to go. So l guess the next thing is what l am putting in for our defence all help greatly needed and much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...