Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCA Help


Foxknowe
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5724 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have sent 10 requests all nearing the 12 working day limit, so far Capital One are the only one to reply and they only sent me a leaflet of their standard terms and conditions and to advise me I am in arrars and not paid!!

 

I have read through the other threads and there are some templates I have stumbled across (not sure of the codes).

 

Can somebody please provide me with the definate template we are using.

 

Also it seems that some of the letters are basicaly saying I will not pay any more, while others are advising I am entitled to my money back (if unenforceable).

 

What is the procedure I am a bit confussed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion the time limits are to be ignored, especially as it is no longer an offence for the creditor not to supply the agreement when asked.

 

For Capital One, I would write back saying that what they have supplied is not a true copy of the agreement therefore you await a proper copy in due course.

 

For all of them, just sit back and wait. Once the 12 days are up, you can legitimately stop paying, but personally I wouldn't write to chase them up. They know the law and it's up to them to comply. They will of course eventually notice that you've stopped paying and write to you with the usual threats, and that is the time to remind them of their obligations.

 

The reason I say this is that if you write chasing them up it just gives them more incentive to have a good hunt around for your agreements sooner rather than later. If you need a 'payment holiday' whilst you get other things sorted out, then they're providing an ideal opportunity.

 

If any of the companies are eventually unable to provide a copy of your agreement, you are not obliged to pay any more to them and could, in theory at least, ask for anything you have paid to be returned. I don't personally know of anyone who has successfully done this though, and it's not something I would do.

 

No agreement or an unenforceable agreement does not make the debt go away, it just means that they can't take court action. If you do stop paying you do need to be aware that they will still keep updating your credit reference file which could have quite serious consequences if your file isn't already trashed.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks RMW, what confusses me is we have fellow members who seem to have challenged these lenders and recovered funds, how can this happen?

 

I actually stumpbed across the websire when doing some research on the validity of Cartel Review advertising that they could get my money back. I think the common though is they are a [problem], however, more and more of these companies are showing up......is there something in it???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why pay them to do something which you can do yourself with the help of this forum?

 

Over getting your money back, I believe that it is called 'restitution' and that you would argue that you made payments in the mistaken belief that an enforceable agreement existed. It would almost certainly end up in court and you would need to be confident that you understood the issues involved to take it that far.

 

The reason I haven't even contemplated doing this myself is that, in most cases, I accept that I did borrow the money so whilst legally I might be entitled to get all my payments back, morally I just wouldn't do it.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...