Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
    • Greetings, I'm writing to seek assistance with an ongoing issue I'm having with Manchester Council.  I parked my car in a residential area behind Wilmslow Road to go purchase some food, not realizing it was a no-parking zone. I later received a letter stating I had failed to make the required payment, and the penalty had increased. I appealed the fine, explaining that I had parked there but never received the original Penalty Charge Notice (PCN), so I was unaware of the need to pay. However, the council's reply did not address my initial concern. Is there anything I can do in this situation? I admit to parking there, and I was willing to pay the original fine, but I don't think it's fair for them to demand a doubled amount when they failed to send me the initial PCN.  Any advice or guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your assistance.   MK Document.pdf
    • If you look at some of the other debt related threads will see that one of the first things which will be asked will be for you to list out your debts in a brief chronological order, including date of debt, amount, creditor, amount outstanding, defaulted – yes/no – date of default, date of last payment made, have you acknowledged the debt at all to the creditors. That lot at least. I expect that my colleague @dx100uk will be along but will meet to know at least that information
    • Hi, I have found this group very helpful hence I am here seeking help and advice.   I got myself into a situation where I have now more than £50k in unsecured debts (personal loans & credit cards) and things are now getting out of control as I am struggling to make payments. This is purely my own created situation and I am taking 100% responsibility for it. I am keen to get out of this situation as soon as possible hence I would appreciate any help and advice in this process. I am employed at the moment and don’t want to risk going into IVA or bankruptcy as this would risk losing my job. Being sole bread earner of my family, I cannot afford to lose my job. I have been trying to keep up with the payments so far and had few missed payments instances until 3/4 months ago but got caught up with missed payments somehow using my savings. All my debts are still with original lenders. However I know I am getting into same situation again shortly and won’t be able to get out of it again. I have started exploring Debt Management Plan (DMP) option through StepChange but haven’t submitted it yet. Based on budgeting, I have around £820 available to make payments to all lenders after taking care of all other essential expenses. This is definitely lot more affordable than what I am currently paying to different lenders. 1. Is DMP right option for me in current situation? 2. what are the negative consequences of availing DMP? 3. is there something else that I can do to get out of this situation? I’m determined to clear out all my debts but need bit of breathing space and time. Let me know please if you need any additional information. Thanks in advance for all your help and guidance. MM  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wave/Ex GMAC Mortgage eviction help


biddy65
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5708 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Olive,

 

No offence taken at all ;)

 

I am fully aware that some (not all) lenders do continue to charge these account management fees (and also that it is not normally mentioned in court- but when it is, judges tend to agree that they should not be). That was precisely why I suggested that they should not be payable & that if they continue to charge them that part can be challenged (as they are no longer justified fees reflecting their costs, but effectively become penalty fees, which are not permitted).

 

The other costs, however, one is indeed stuck with, as they are contractual (unless, of course, a hearing needs to be adjourned entirely due to the gross incompetence of the Claimant, in which case the judge may disallow the costs for that hearing).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Olive,

 

No offence taken at all ;)

 

I am fully aware that some (not all) lenders do continue to charge these account management fees (and also that it is not normally mentioned in court- but when it is, judges tend to agree that they should not be). That was precisely why I suggested that they should not be payable & that if they continue to charge them that part can be challenged (as they are no longer justified fees reflecting their costs, but effectively become penalty fees, which are not permitted).

 

The other costs, however, one is indeed stuck with, as they are contractual (unless, of course, a hearing needs to be adjourned entirely due to the gross incompetence of the Claimant, in which case the judge may disallow the costs for that hearing).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it is mainly just sub prime lenders that charge this fee and yes you are right it is as far as I am concerned a penalty. My judge said that i had to remortgage to escape them as he could not do anything, but that it anouther story.

 

Biddy what I suggest is that you look on your monthly statements that you have been getting, as you have been behind for a while. They should be shown on there if they are charging you

 

olives xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it is mainly just sub prime lenders that charge this fee and yes you are right it is as far as I am concerned a penalty. My judge said that i had to remortgage to escape them as he could not do anything, but that it anouther story.

 

Biddy what I suggest is that you look on your monthly statements that you have been getting, as you have been behind for a while. They should be shown on there if they are charging you

 

olives xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,just had the letter today from the court it states on there that payment should be made by the 28 th which we explained we couldn't do we have made the weekly payments from when we went to court and they haven't returned them but this doesn't cover the full amount they supposed to get,did explain to the judge that we were going to pay weekly but he hasn't taken this in to consideration have contact the lender but had no response only got three days to find the rest. where do we stand if we have made payments but not the full amount?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,just had the letter today from the court it states on there that payment should be made by the 28 th which we explained we couldn't do we have made the weekly payments from when we went to court and they haven't returned them but this doesn't cover the full amount they supposed to get,did explain to the judge that we were going to pay weekly but he hasn't taken this in to consideration have contact the lender but had no response only got three days to find the rest. where do we stand if we have made payments but not the full amount?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it say anything about weekly payments? Also if your original agreement was for the 1st of the month why was it changed to the 28th.

Judge's don't nomally alter the contract date.I wouldn't worry too much as long as your payment is only a few days late,with the new government guidelines you will be ok as you are paying the agreed amount abiet a few days late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it say anything about weekly payments? Also if your original agreement was for the 1st of the month why was it changed to the 28th.

Judge's don't nomally alter the contract date.I wouldn't worry too much as long as your payment is only a few days late,with the new government guidelines you will be ok as you are paying the agreed amount abiet a few days late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Biddy, it will depend on whether the order says first payment by 28th October or payment by 28th of the month - which does the order say?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Biddy, it will depend on whether the order says first payment by 28th October or payment by 28th of the month - which does the order say?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as the order is concerned, if you don't make a payment of the full mortgage instalment plus £200 by 28 October, you will be in breach of the order, and the mortgage company can apply for a warrant for eviction.

 

In practice that is probably unlikely, but not impossible. If they do obtain an eviction date, you can apply to the court to have that suspended- and if you can show that you have been making weekly payments, you may have a reasonable prospect of success. HOWEVER, each time the matter goes back to court will weaken your prospects of success, and, because you are in breach of the order, the mortgage company will be entitled to add their legal costs for that hearing to your account- so it will cost you as well.

 

If you have been making weekly payments, that should already go towards reducing what you still have to pay by Tuesday- is there any way in which you can get hold of funds to meet the shortfall?

 

The court can't change the contractual due date, but the court can set a date for a first payment. There might be an argument (although a fairly weak one), that you should be fine provided that you pay the additional amount ordered by the court by the 28th, and the full amount of the mortgage instalment by the 1st (i.e. the £200 would be the 1st payment, made by 28 October, and the mortgage instalment as if falls due, i.e. by the 1st). Several mortgage companies ask for payments to be made by the 28th, so that the funds clear & reach their accounts by the 1st. Although, to be honest, I would be very surprised if they issued a warrant if the funds are paid in by the 1st. That said, I suspect if you can't make payment by Tuesday, the additional 4 days that payment by the 1st would give you probably won't make much difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as the order is concerned, if you don't make a payment of the full mortgage instalment plus £200 by 28 October, you will be in breach of the order, and the mortgage company can apply for a warrant for eviction.

 

In practice that is probably unlikely, but not impossible. If they do obtain an eviction date, you can apply to the court to have that suspended- and if you can show that you have been making weekly payments, you may have a reasonable prospect of success. HOWEVER, each time the matter goes back to court will weaken your prospects of success, and, because you are in breach of the order, the mortgage company will be entitled to add their legal costs for that hearing to your account- so it will cost you as well.

 

If you have been making weekly payments, that should already go towards reducing what you still have to pay by Tuesday- is there any way in which you can get hold of funds to meet the shortfall?

 

The court can't change the contractual due date, but the court can set a date for a first payment. There might be an argument (although a fairly weak one), that you should be fine provided that you pay the additional amount ordered by the court by the 28th, and the full amount of the mortgage instalment by the 1st (i.e. the £200 would be the 1st payment, made by 28 October, and the mortgage instalment as if falls due, i.e. by the 1st). Several mortgage companies ask for payments to be made by the 28th, so that the funds clear & reach their accounts by the 1st. Although, to be honest, I would be very surprised if they issued a warrant if the funds are paid in by the 1st. That said, I suspect if you can't make payment by Tuesday, the additional 4 days that payment by the 1st would give you probably won't make much difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, how are you making the payments - is it by phone?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, how are you making the payments - is it by phone?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right- First of all, let me say that it is extremely unlikely that the mortgage lender would apply for a warrant for possession between now and Friday- particularly if you have kept them informed.

 

Secondly, even if they did apply for a warrant today or tomorrow, they would not get an eviction date before Friday, and if you were fully paid up then, they would either vacate any such date, or you would have a very solid case for applying to have any such warrant suspended.

 

Thirdly (as I mentioned before) check the contractual due date! There is an argument, that the first date stipulated by the court only refers to the additional amount (and you had paid more than the £200 by yesterday), whereas the instalment falls due by the contractual date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right- First of all, let me say that it is extremely unlikely that the mortgage lender would apply for a warrant for possession between now and Friday- particularly if you have kept them informed.

 

Secondly, even if they did apply for a warrant today or tomorrow, they would not get an eviction date before Friday, and if you were fully paid up then, they would either vacate any such date, or you would have a very solid case for applying to have any such warrant suspended.

 

Thirdly (as I mentioned before) check the contractual due date! There is an argument, that the first date stipulated by the court only refers to the additional amount (and you had paid more than the £200 by yesterday), whereas the instalment falls due by the contractual date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Wave/Ex GMAC Mortgage eviction help
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...