Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Health club woes...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5727 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks.

 

This'll be my first post, oddly enough I was directed here from a motorcycle forum which is entirely unrelated to the problem I currently have, (well, I used a motorbike to get to where I'm having the problem with...)

 

I'll try to keep it short. Basically I was a member at David Lloyd Leisure (I know, middle class territory, I probably have a bob or two but I don't. :() They have the usual 12 month contract which contractually you have to honour but here's what happened.

 

In month five of my membership my monthly pay got fouled up and all my direct debits bounced, one of which was for David Lloyd Leisure (from now on to save typing: DLL :)) I managed to sort the rest out getting some of the charges cancelled, I know DLL reapply for missed DD's mid-month so phoned to explain that there still wasn't any money in the account and if they tried again I'd be charged.

 

I was met with a brick wall with "CLUB POLICY" scrawled on it, no matter what I said or how I said it, they kept saying 'club policy.' I ended up going on line and cancelling the DD at my end, and due to the pretty foul attitude of DLL staff and of course; the dreaded Club Policy, didn't go back to the club.

 

As far as I'm concerned my membership ended on the last day of June and I never set foot in the club again. They wrote to me looking for payment after two months, I contacted them and said I wouldn't be returning and explained why; guess what they said... CLUB POLICY!!

 

I'm now being persued for the remainder of the 12 months (*£528) by ARC Credit Management which is nice of them. :rolleyes: I sent a letter offering a compromise, I'd come back for the remainder of the contract if they waived the months I'd not used the club but so far, had no response.

 

I have the contract and it says the 12 months must be adhered to and any court action would take place in England (I live in Scotland.)

 

My question is this: If the service they provide is so poor, can I end the contract early. Is there something in my Statutory Rights that I could use? Also, can they make me go to court in England given all this took place in Scotland, I'm more familiar with civil law here than south of the border...

 

I did an internet search and DLL is famed for doing this, as the song says: 'You can check out, but you can never leave...' ;-)

 

Sorry to be so verbose but I hate the thought of being bullied by a big corporate entity like this, it sits poorly on my mind. I've been reasonable through out and never abusive (not my way of doing things, prefer negotiation to confrontation.)

 

Thanks in advance. ;)

 

Paul

 

*Should read £528.

Edited by pa_broon74
Typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to shoot you down on first post, but really dont get your argument?

 

They havent provided a poor service, they just demanded payment when due. You are, as far as I can see, wholly liable for the remainder of your fixed term contract.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to shoot you down on first post, but really dont get your argument?

 

They havent provided a poor service, they just demanded payment when due. You are, as far as I can see, wholly liable for the remainder of your fixed term contract.

 

 

The poor service occured when I asked (for what I thought to be reasonable) assistance from the club. Is there no protection in contract law for this type of thing?

 

For example, if the staff all of a sudden started ignoring members totally, could the member not cancel as they aren't getting the service which they are paying for.

 

Is there nothing in consumer law that covers this? (If not, perhaps there should be.) To be honest, I'm ambivalent about the club, I quite liked it which is why I said I'd go back. But in this instance, the service was poor, they just refused to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think the service was poor - they just refused to budge on taking payments for a contract you had signed up for. Agreed, they should have helped. But they have no legal obligation to, and the taking of one payment when you didnt want them to certainly does not warrant(legally OR morally) a cancellation of the rest of the 12 month contract without penalty.

 

No there is nothing in consumer law that covers this, and personally see no need for it - I do not think the club have acted particularly inappropriately.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think the service was poor - they just refused to budge on taking payments for a contract you had signed up for. Agreed, they should have helped. But they have no legal obligation to, and the taking of one payment when you didnt want them to certainly does not warrant(legally OR morally) a cancellation of the rest of the 12 month contract without penalty.

 

No there is nothing in consumer law that covers this, and personally see no need for it - I do not think the club have acted particularly inappropriately.

 

I think opinions on what constitutes poor service and the morality of the situation will differ from person to person.

 

On the points that aren't open to personal opinion though, the contract says any dispute would be settled in an English Country Court; can this be enforced or can I appeal to have moved to a Scottish civil court?

 

I would say, going back to your final statement, there is every need for it. What is there to stop business' from signing people up to contracts then subsequently moving the goalposts or changing things to the point were the consumer is no longer getting the service they signed up for in the first place?

 

It might be the case in law, but it seems to me a lot of debt is manufactured, we really do live in a country who's economy is debt driven. :rolleyes:

 

Thanks for the replies so far.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

IT will - at the end of the day it is only my personal opinion.

 

However, there has been no changing of the goalposts. They did not change the payments required, they did not change the service provided. THERE WAS NO CHANGE TO THE TERMS IN THE CONTRACT. It was in fact you who first of all breached the contract by not paying, and then attempted to change the terms by wanting a delay in paying following this.

 

It's not that I dont sympathise - as I say, the club SHOULD have allowed you to delay payment. But there is clearly no defence to the outstanding contract I am afraid.

 

With regards moving court, no idea, but I would strongly advise that you don't go that far - I just cannot see you winning.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell you what - I'll explain another way.

 

Although there is no provision in consumer law per se, there is in contract law. IE if there is a severe enough breach of contract, the contract CAN be terminated by the injured party.

 

The issue you have here is not whether this is a severe breach(which it absolutely undoubtedly is not), but whether it is a breach AT ALL. I fail to see how it is, I must admit that I am at best confused about your "moving of the goalposts" comment, as unless I am missing something obvious, there has been NO change to the service offered. In fact, your complaint is basically to do with the fact that they WOULDNT change it!

  • Haha 1

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell you what - I'll explain another way.

 

Although there is no provision in consumer law per se, there is in contract law. IE if there is a severe enough breach of contract, the contract CAN be terminated by the injured party.

 

The issue you have here is not whether this is a severe breach(which it absolutely undoubtedly is not), but whether it is a breach AT ALL. I fail to see how it is, I must admit that I am at best confused about your "moving of the goalposts" comment, as unless I am missing something obvious, there has been NO change to the service offered. In fact, your complaint is basically to do with the fact that they WOULDNT change it!

 

The 'moving the goalposts' and 'changing things' was purely a 'what if' scenario in terms of that last point I was making. I wasn't saying that they'd done either in my case.

 

I'll need to rethink this in light of what you've said. Its one of these things that has no gotten to the point where I can't easily afford to clear the arrears anyway which is partially my own fault.

 

Thanks for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome....good luck.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...