Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclaycard PPI Refund.Help Required!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5644 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I have recently wrote to Barclaycard requesting a full refund of £253.56 for "payment protection premiums" as i was unemployed when i was signed up for the card.

 

This is actually the second request i've sent but i forgot to send the 1st by recorded delivery so as it was over 2 weeks ago i'm sure they've ignored it hoping i'll go away (NO CHANCE:grin:) but I did send the 2nd request 1st class recorded and it was delivered on 27th August08 but i've not recieved anything back as yet but i would expect them to take the full 12 days!!!

 

Just as a matter of interest, If they didn't respond what would be my next move???

 

Any help would be greatly appriciated.

 

Cheers Adamsdad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sit tight and wait for a responce. Even send both letters again recorded delivery. If still no responce in 14 days.Go to the FOS and log your complaint with them they will resolve the matter for you but it will take several weeks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Adamsdad

 

They are naughty aren't they? Now it's time to make them sit up and pay attention ;)

 

I would send this letter to them:

 

 

Date

 

Re: Account X

 

Dear X

 

I am extremely disappointed that as a leading financial institution regulated by both the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the Banking Code, you have not seen fit to respond to my letters of (insert dates here).

 

I wrote to you on both occasions regarding what I consider to be the mis-selling of Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) on the above named credit card account. I requested a full refund of my premiums, plus interest paid. I would like to cancel this insurance policy forthwith as it is not fit for purpose and has never been suitable for my personal circumstances.

 

The account was opened on (insert date) and I elected to take out PPI. However, it was not explained to me at any time that there were exclusions within this policy that would apply as I was unemployed at the time and would therefore be unable to make a claim within the policy. It was also not explained to me that similar or better insurance cover for this loan could be bought elsewhere at a much more competitive rate. My personal circumstances were not questioned at any time while opting to take out the PPI.

 

Financial institutions such as yourselves are under an obligation to ensure that the policy they are selling is appropriate to that customer and clearly you have not fulfilled this requirement. The FOS takes the matter of mis-selling of PPI extremely seriously, as do I, and in many cases have imposed large fines on financial institutions who are in breach of regulations.

 

I am requesting, therefore, a full refund of all PPI payments to date plus the interest charged on these, totalling £x

 

I will give you 14 days from receipt of this letter in which to respond to this request. If you do not respond positively within this time period, I shall have no other recourse but to take my claim to the Financial Ombudsmen Service/ initiate court proceedings against you to recover these monies. (You choose which option you pefer here)

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

X

 

Send the letter first class signed for delivery keping a copy for yourself.

 

They will probably send you a letter fobbing you off, in which case we can move to the next stage and send a sterner letter.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Adamsdad

 

You're most welcome, although I should point out that this is not a template letter but one that I created on the spot, just for you :)

 

I look forward to hearing about Barclaycard's response ...

 

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Paintball and anyone else taking an interest in plight!

 

Sorry i havn't posted for a while but i work away for months at a time but i'm back now and here's were i'm upto.

I sent the letter Paintball so kindly made up for me (#3) on 09th September 2008. On 07th October 2008 I recieved a copy of my T&C's which i requested 4 weeks earlier along with a letter stating that they were taking my request seriousley and that they hoped to have resolved my complaint by 14th October 2008. Then on the 13th October 2008 they wrote stating that they were still looking into my complaint and hoped to have it resolved by 14th November 2008! I think they are taking the mick!!!!!

Also i read somewere on the site that they are obligated to send the original copy of my T&C's including a copy of the original application form which would have my signature on it, all i recieved was a copy of the then T&C's. Is this correct???

Should i wait until 14th November 2008 or will i just be fobbed off again??

or should i just get the ball roling with the small claims court??

 

Any advice as always would be greatly appreciated.

 

Cheers Adamsdad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I would most certainly NOT be waiting around until 14 Nov for them to deal with your claim.

 

Have you sent your SAR? If so, then they have a statutory time limit of 40 days in which to provide all the info relating to the account and the PPI ... if not then make that request as Barclays are past masters at taking the 'P' and dragging things out ...

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paintball,

 

The S.A.R was sent sometime ago and i did recieve all of my statements and have infact recouped all of my charges it's just the PPI i'm trying to recoup now on the grounds i was unemployed at the time i was signed up for the card and although i have sent 2 letters requesting a full refund of PPI payments made (at this point i have just added up all the PPI payments as they appeared on my statements and not added any interest) they keep fobbing me off that's why i was considering making the next step the small claims court.

What do you think???

 

Cheers Adamsdad

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

Bit of advice on the following would be extremely appreciated.

I have just recieved a letter back from Barclaycard explaining that they have reviewed my claim for a refund of PPI payments made on my Barclaycard and that they have decided that compensation, as they put it, is not applicable in this case for the following reason;

QUOTE.

The payment protection commenced on the account on 28th July 2003 and a policy document was sent to you a few days later. You had a 30 day cooling off period in which to examine the document, decide if it was suitable for you and cancel it if necessary.

You had never requested to cancel the policy, nor have you queried any of the charges applied to the account for the previous years.

Our "condition's of use" state that it is your responsibility to ensure that your spending is reconciled each month against your statement. Payment Protection insurance was shown on each statement and communication should have been made to Barclaycard in order to rectify this. Unquote.

 

This letter has actually crossed in the post with my LBA of court and was just wondering if i should write back to them explaining that i never recieved any PPI document and was just nieve in believing that PPI was just something that i had to have.

Shoud i have brought it to their attention earlier??

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

Bit of advice on the following would be extremely appreciated.

I have just recieved a letter back from Barclaycard explaining that they have reviewed my claim for a refund of PPI payments made on my Barclaycard and that they have decided that compensation, as they put it, is not applicable in this case for the following reason;

QUOTE.

The payment protection commenced on the account on 28th July 2003 and a policy document was sent to you a few days later. You had a 30 day cooling off period in which to examine the document, decide if it was suitable for you and cancel it if necessary.

You had never requested to cancel the policy, nor have you queried any of the charges applied to the account for the previous years.

Our "condition's of use" state that it is your responsibility to ensure that your spending is reconciled each month against your statement. Payment Protection insurance was shown on each statement and communication should have been made to Barclaycard in order to rectify this. Unquote.

You have since the sale come to understand more about the reguslations governing the sale of PPI and feel that you have not been treated fairly, were not given sufficient info to enable you to make an informed decision based upon your needs and circusmtances, and had you known then what you know now, would never have agreed to purchase the cover.You have a lawful right to pursue your claim with Barclaycard

This letter has actually crossed in the post with my LBA of court and was just wondering if i should write back to them explaining that i never recieved any PPI document and was just nieve in believing that PPI was just something that i had to have.

Shoud i have brought it to their attention earlier??

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Wait for their response ... then decide what you will put in your next letter to them. You can state this in a subsequest letter and offer them the opportunity to 'reconsider their position'.

 

Let us know if they respond to the LBA and if so, what they say ... :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...