Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • he may be using a different name but cars and vans/vans and cars it’s all the same Gerard Bird/Gerry Bird/G Bird aka Gurdip Singh Virdi He is still doing the same thing, operating from the same premises at 101a Longford, I’m guessing during Covid they got the great idea to rip people off remotely and charge people for the pleasure. they now deliver cars that are shocking quality and refuse to even accept the issues you find. Then Gaslight you into thinking your the problem and call you an idiot for buying a used car instead of a new one. Buyers beware this thread is vitally important     
    • Changes to China's state secrets law requires internet firms to monitor information shared by users.View the full article
    • The only way to verify whether there is any financial reward for the management is seeing the agreement. That would be required during disclosure IF court proceedings went ahead... Unless you could bring pressure to bear and get a copy?
    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A & L Getting Shirty


Steve_T
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5706 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I successfully reclaimed over £3k from Barclays even though they took it right to the wire. A&L was to have been my parachute account but it wasn't needed. So I've used the A&L account a little and not had any probs.

 

However it's now got totally out of hand. Last month they charged me £5 a day for 2 days because I was "Technically overdrawn". I was not. I banked a £200 cheque and spent sums of £57 and £35 but this was 2 days before the cheque cleared. My account showed a ballance of £217 and the cheque did not bounce. I was never at any time in reality overdrawn.

 

Then on Hol I withdrew some Euros knowing I had over £70 (£77) in my account. I got it wrong and withdrew £92. - They slapped on a £25 charge making me even more overdrawn.

 

I returned home to be told I was £47 overdrawn so I deposited £50. They immediately slapped on 3 days @£5 unauthorised overdraft and made me overdrawn again. They tell me they'll be taking £125 on 21st of august for all the days THEY caused me to be overdrawn.

 

I told them

 

1) In the first instance of the £10 I was never overdrawn

2) an ATM should be like a piggy bank. If there is only £77 in your account that's all you can get -these things are computers - should be easy to do

3) I said to allow me to draw more than I had in my account from an ATM and then charge £25 was much like entrapment.

4) They caused me to go back into overdraft and then cheerfully chaged £5 a day without telling me. They could have afforded a second class stamp.

5) I pointed out these were a penalty not a charge as they were performing no kind of service for me.

 

I spoke to 3 different people who were all singing from the same hymn sheet. The must have all had staff training. They were aggressive and rude and quoted the "terms and conditions" mantra over and over.

 

I went intoday and paid £12.68 making my ballance £0.00

 

I am now writing to them asking them to close the account. They will probably refuse in order to keep the account open to apply the charge of £125 which will then attract a charge of £5 a day (till it bankrups me ?) I have pointed out that this is irresponsible, unconciencable and maybe illegal. If push comes to shove I'll go in and pay then £125 and tell them to stick it. Why are these people such ****s and fail to recognise a a sensible and reasonable argument.

Edited by Steve_T
Typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

You might as well tell them that you will reclaim all charges, you could start the claim now, we all know the banks will loose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Andrew - I was hoping to just walk away from it. The Barclays fight, although we won was more than enough for me. I thought we'd seen the last of these charges because on the odd time we get one, my wife calls Barclays and tells them to refund us and they always do.

 

No such luck with A & L. Despite my asking them to close the account and NOT apply the ridiculous £125 they ignored me and applied a £125 charge to a zero balance account on 21st Aug making me once again overdrawn (£125). We went in to see the Bank manager as we were going away and with the bank holiday coming up we would attract another £25 charges by Tuesday. I say "Bank Manager".- she was little more than a shop assistant and had to call head office herself who then got shirty with her and cited the "terms and conditions" mantra.

 

We we're obliged to "borrow" £125 (credit card) to bring the account back to Zero otherwise face rising charges and possible bad credit rating. However we were still unable to close the account as further charges are waiting to go on in September. It looks like we will eventually get Charged £160 for going £12 overdrawn.

 

I've now had a letter saying that they will deal with my "complaint" after the current "test case" which might take a year. They say that if I submit a claim they will apply to the court for a stay of hearing until the current test case is heard.

 

I was going to attach a PDF of this rather long letter as itmay be quite informative to others going though the process. However, I can't see how to do that. If a Moderator would like to request this document I will send it on.

Edited by Steve_T
typos and clarity
Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like it is the standard letter they are sending out, as are most banks now. Our advice is always carry on with your claim. Whether it is £1 or £1,000, it is still YOUR money. And for the way you have been treated you could put a complaint in with the FOS.

 

Financial Ombudsman Service

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link Sea-Sidelady. I will indeed pursue this to the bitter end but up to now I had not been making a claim. I simply wanted them to stop slapping escalating charges on. I think I shall complain FOS their treatment of me. Clearly they are able to stonewall any financial claims and offset them for possibly a year. If in the first instance I do not claim any money back but complain about their behaviour I might get in under the radar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

it goes on and on

 

letter posted to Alliance and Pester today tells all

 

 

 

 

16/09/200

 

 

Alliance and Leicester

Customer Service Centre

Bootle

Merseyside

G1R 0AA

 

Dear Sir,

 

I wish to complain about the really stressful day your bank needlessly caused me yesterday by inefficiency and ignorance.

 

I received my statement number 27 which told me I was to be charged £35 on 20th September. As we are to be on holiday from the 16th to 23rd I went into the Middlesbrough branch on Saturday 13th September and deposited £35. I had a great deal of trouble depositing this money and they were not going to accept it until I insisted because I knew I would return from holiday to find your appalling £5 per day charges still going on.

 

Because of the uncertainty of this deposit and the handwritten receipt I was given I called Customer services on Monday to ascertain that everything was in order so I could go on Holiday with a degree of peace of mind. I say this because since my holiday in July when I went £12 overdrawn you have charged me nearly £300 and locked me into a loop of despair that I can not escape from. I made a total of 4 calls to your call centres yesterday and was told something different each time. I must say that in general your call centre staff are pugnacious, combative and rude.

 

Call number 1

Made at 11.20 am aprox 15/09/2008. It was confirmed that my £35 had been received but that there was a further £50 to come off in charges. I sought an explanation for this but none that I could decipher was given. The operator then recalculated this figure to be £45. I was then obliged to go and teach 30 unruly children with this worry and concern of being in your loop of despair forever. Indeed, I could not function in my job properly and sought permission to go home early.

 

Call number 2

3.30 am aprox 15/09/2008

On arriving home I made another call. I was told I was £33.50 overdrawn and that if I did not put £35 into my account to meet the charge planned for September 20th then I would once again be charge £5 per day ad infinitum which concerned me a great deal as I will be on holiday on the 20th. I could not understand how I could be overdrawn as I had met all the charges demanded of me. I said I had already made the £35 payment in preparation for September 20th. This operator was particularly pugnacious and rude and I wish you to seek him out and reprimand him. Not only was he pugnacious and rude but it appears he may also have been fundamentally WRONG no matter how assertive he was that he was correct. He pointed out that I had been talking to him for 13 minutes and that he had repeated himself several times. I pointed out that what he was telling me was irrational which was why I was questioning it and that I could not understand what was going on which was why I was wishing to have it explained to me which he spectacularly failed to do. I also pointed out that his assertions differed from his colleague of call number 1 hence my confusion. He concluded that it might be a good idea to deposit £50 to be on the safe side. I concluded that Alliance and Liecester were in the process of leaving me penniless whilst I was going on holiday.

 

The Middlesbrough Branch

 

My wife and I then went to the Middlesbrough branch who were no help at all. They could not tell us anything. They could not see the £35 paid in on Sept 13th at that branch showing up on our account. We were obliged to go out into the street and call customer services once more.

 

Call number 3

 

This was a brief call made around 4.30. The operator told me that I was £33.50 overdrawn. I said that this could not be, the account was inactive. She said that a charge of £35 had gone out of my account on September 5th. Against my wifes wishes I got my hands on a further £35 and deposited this in the same sloppy fashion that I had done on the 13th (hand written receipt.) By this time my wife and I were really stressed out and I was coming close to causing a breach of the peace in your Middlesbrough Branch.

 

Call number 4

 

I returned home and made this call around 5.30. The operator who was polite and helpful was Rebecca Haynesworth in the Leeds call Centre who consulted her supervisor Adrian Booth. She started by saying there were insufficient funds to meet the Sept 20th charge. When I questioned this she said that I had been rendered £33.50 overdrawn by a charge of £35 levied on September 5th. I said I knew of no such charge, my statement no 26 showed a charge of £125 going out on 21st August (which I paid) and statement no 27 shows a charge of £35 to go out on September 20th. She told me that because I had sought to close the account that the September 20th payment of £35 had actually been taken on September 5th rendering me £3.50 overdrawn

 

Why did you take this payment on September 5th? You had no right to do so – your statement states that it will go out on September 20th for which I have made adequate provision.

 

I calculated that I could expect a charge of £35 7 days @£5 per day from September 5th when you took this money till 13th when I deposited £35 in preparation for the September 20th charge. Ms Haynesworth told me that I would not be charged for being overdrawn from the 5th and that the account would be closed and that my second payment of £35 effectively put me in credit to the tune £36.50 and that a cheque would be sent to me. I told her that from experience I did not believe her which is why she game me her name.

 

I do not wish to return from holiday to find that you are charging me more and more. I want the account closed and a cheque for £36.50 as promised/

 

When I return I intend to complain to the Ombudsman about your appalling treatment of me. This is not a complaint about bank charges an will therefore not be offset to some time in the distant future.

 

On the other hand I do want all these charges over the past 3 months in view of your appallingly poor efficiency and treatment of me and my wife. These charges have arisen from effectively being £10 overdrawn.

 

21 June £10 for being “technically” overdrawn when I was not overdrawn at all

2 July £25 for allowing me to draw £20 more than I had from a Greek ATM (effectively £10 in view of the item above)

20 July £15

21st August £125

20th September £35 (or is it 5th of September or Both £35 X 2 = £70)

 

Notwithstanding your “terms and conditions” which I never actually read or took legal advice over or the “Test Case” currently ongoing it is within your power to make this refund on a discretionary basis in view of all I have said above. I urge you to do so. When you do or do not I shall be making the complaint to the Ombudsman mentioned above and if you do not you have my assurance that I shall pursue a claim through the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...