Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with you, UB. More parties might not be such a bad thing. More on Farage's manifesto - sorry, contract.  
    • Sorry but first of all you are still referring to your six-month right to reject – but you didn't assert your right within six months so this is not relevant. The situation is that you cannot reject the vehicle unless it is a write off or you have been deprived of the use of it for a significant period of time so that it can be said that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract. By my understanding that is not the case here. Your complaint must be that they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car. On this basis you are holding them responsible for the cost of repairs which are £XXX and any ancillary costs reasonably incurred as a result of their breach of contract. You are currently without the car and this is not a situation which can continue. You are enclosing the evidence plus quotations for repair and you want that by the end of the week you want them to agree to the repairs. Broadly that. Please post a draft as soon as possible. You don't want to hang around on this
    • Hello folks  Got a letter from overdales the day after I submitted my defence this contains a copy of credit card agreement and a letter stating the account has been sold to lowell. H
    • Seen a number of videos online of interviews with people in town centres around the UK. Those that say they will vote Reform can accurately be described as 'Gammon Faced'. So frustrated with life in 2024 and yearning to switch the clock back many decades, they don't really care about the policies of Reform. What appears to appeal to them about Reform is an old fashioned nostalgic outlook, of trying to get the country back to how it was a very long time ago. Yes much of this is about immigration, but it is also about many other issues such as Equalities legislation, Human Rights etc, which they believe have gone too far. For the above reasons, I don't think many who are looking to vote Reform, will switch their votes back to other parties they have voted for before. From what I have seen in polling, 70% were previously Tory and about 30% Labour. The Tories under Sunak can no longer appeal to those who now back Reform. For example, I doubt any Tory Government would support leaving ECHR, because that would most likely be opposed by the majority in the UK. And many Tory MP's would not support leaving ECHR and the House of Lords would block anyway ignoring any conventions to give way to The Commons. A combination of Brexit, Reform lead by Farage and the average age of this voter demographic is quite likely to lead to the extinction of The Conservative party. What may happen after this election is that the right of politics splits into new groups. Some Tory MP's are likely to jump ship and join Reform. And others will try to relaunch the Conservative brand as a centre right modern party. This could possibly lead to the Lib Dems becoming main opposition party at some point. The outcome of this election could well significantly change UK politics forever. And it is not just about the future of the Tories, Labour with a huge majority may find it difficult to keep some on the left happy with Government progress on tackling some issues. So we may see a fracture within Labour support and new parties formed.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Stikky taking on Virgin for late payment's refund.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5778 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm about to got for a refund of all the late payment charges Telewest / Virgin have taken me for over the past 11 yrs i've been with them.

Will this do for the S.A.R request ? >>

 

Data Protection Act 1998 – Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx

 

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my account history with your organization dating back to 1997. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable

 

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my business with you.If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, then I shall be reclaiming them, and also reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Stix

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't quite understand how this works.

 

I am always late paying for about 2 or 3 years I think and get late charge everytime. Reason because my finances have been screwed for 3/4 years so I wait until I get my next salary and then pay. I have only just been refunded 3 months worth as I am not getting any bills and don't know when and how much to pay and have just been guessing. However the same thing has happened again this month. I have just emailed them politely.

 

However reading these posts is there a chance of getting 3 years worth of late payment charges back? That would be a nice little present :-)

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Little update,

 

I got my S.A.R request back a couple of days ago, but there's about 18 months worth of info missing, so i'm going to send this letter off on Monday >

 

 

Dear .......

 

Thank you for the information you sent me on 13th August 2008 in accordance with my Data Protection Act request (Subject Access Request) which was delivered to you on 8th August 2008.

 

However, the disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that the following documents are missing.

 

You have failed to provide a complete list of transactions and charges for the dates 07/06/2002 to 20/12/2003 inclusive.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

You have a further 30 days to comply.

 

In addition, I understand that under the Unfair Terms in the Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, penalty charges must reflect administration costs and cannot be punitive. I now understand that the regime of fees which you have been applying to my account in relation to non direct debit admin fee, late payment charge, payment handling charge and so forth are unlawful at Common Law and contrary to consumer regulations. If you disagree with this, will you please substantiate these charges by letting me have a full breakdown of the costs to which you have been put by as a result of my breaches, in order to reassure me that your charges really do reflect your costs.

 

Yours faithfully.

..........

 

I'm just wondering if i should include that last paragraph or save it for the letter in which i make a claim for a refund? (or do both)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. I am reading this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/telecoms-mobile-fixed/9306-telewest-10-00-late.html

 

quite a lot to get through.

 

I am guessing though that you can only claim back 6 years worth? Same as banks?

 

This issue is discussed towards the end of that thread you're reading. A good post in particular to read with regards to this is #287 on page 15 by Bookworm :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO you ought to speak to Buzby, has lots of info on Virgin Media & Sky, should b able to find several threads.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not at liberty to provide a detailed breakdown of the costs involved' date=' but I am informed that the actual additional cost of processing non-Direct Debit payments is in fact higher than the fee that Virgin Media charges its customers.[/quote']

 

That always makes me laugh! Their payments office staff must be on over £300 per hour then, 'cos it doesn't take more than a minute to do!

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW I should point out that I simply do not accept that 'the actual additional cost of processing non-direct debit payments is in fact higher than the fee that Virgin Media charges its customers'.

 

Surely if this were the case they would only offer services to customers willing to pay by DD?

 

But my guess is the reason they don't do that is they want as many customers as they can get. Perhaps they are making a loss on on ALL non dd customers, but I simply cannot accept that.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£5 per month is way over the top! Just greedy!

 

If you estimate people's average bill at £50 per month, it could not possibly be 10% for handling the money IMHO. If it costs more than £5 for handling money, how does amazon, one of the biggest Internet shops sell music CDs, DVDs and books sub £5 when they don't even accept payment by direct debit? VM have a screw loose somewhere!

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's complete nonsense. I develop websites and have to integrate systems like Protix and Cardstream, or whatever. Most charge a fixed amount per month and a per transaction fee of 20p or whatever deal they have. And that is for small companies. It's an absolute con!

 

I havnt started claiming yet. I'll see how this thread goes. But I must have almost £300 worth of late payment charges to claim back and then two years worth of direct debit charges. Maybe a nice pressie waiting for me ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...