Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Shame that Sparkle's gone. Still, perhaps next time they'll introduce us to their friend 'carefulnotmean' who was with us earlier!

 

Or should that be 'notverycarefulandmean':D

Sorry Apollo18 Only connection to Swift is they are trying to repossess my sister's property. Am in N. Ireland and very interested in case going on there.Over the last year have got to know The High Court in Chicester Street and Enforcement of Judgments office in Bedford Street too well.

After finding this Forum I have sent a Subject Access Request to Swift but have nothing of interest to Post.

Am very grateful to all those who are posting especially Sparkie1723 and pkelly

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just received a copy of Mark Whites witness statement for thursday...........2 pages ( 5 paragraphs) it has no substance at all.........but here is a section where he contradicts himself.

 

He says in this statement

 

 

"The trial simply proceeded on the Defendants counterclaim"

 

and goes on to say

"That the matters raised in the " Joint Defence Statement" are either matters that have aleady been litigated or are of no relevance and provide no Defence to the claim for possession".

 

This is where Mr White comes up against this paragraph of our Defence.

 

Judges aren't daft.

 

33.. The Defendants also submit that the making of known deliberate misleading false statements to the Court under oath should be considered as an issue of contempt of Court by Mr White, and refer the Court to the case KJM Superbikes v Hinton [2008] EWHC 1280 which deals with the effect false statements can have on a proceedings

 

First he says all that was heard was our counterclaim ............then he attempts to say the possession hearing was heard and decided and judged at that trial.....again trying to misled the court.......The judgement summary says at the end ......The order of the Court is that the Counterclaim is dismissed ..........................nothing else

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

RE the previous trial.

 

The fact of the matter is that when I was given the Court Bundle by the solicitors I had engaged 2 days before the Trial I saw that the Claim submitted was absulutely weak and insufficiently pleaded .............so dispensed with the Barrister .................the person that accompanied me to Court from the solicitors was not a solicitor and could not represent me.

 

I was forced to act for myself .......I had had just two days to look through this BUndle that consisted of over 400 pages...and I took on a senior Barrister from Big Gun chambers in London.......a significant imbalance of representation I suffered an injustice...............the Reorder refused me point blank permission to appeal...........and I had to fght him to get permission to apply for permission to appeal........which when I looked into this found it was far beyond me to do..hence I am in the position I am in NOW the Recorder was wrong .

I should not have been forced to take the case on I should have had a choice ........that was denied me.

 

I know my case a lot better this time.

 

Since then the legal complaints authority have awarded us over £3000 for poor service and poor advice.

The Barrister is under investigation by the Bar Council........... as is Swifts Barrister for using Mr White as a witness who makes misleading statements under oath

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the documents Mr White has submitted attached to his "statement of truth" is a copy of the Judgent summary of the previous trial ( which I have had for months) and I know it inside out.

Its in this Judgement summary where I will get my bulletts from......Mr White has been a bit careless there............I don't have to include it in my full defence and counterclaim..he's already produced it:)

 

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have come to this conclusion

 

sparkie

 

 

Lawyers spend a great deal of their time shovelling smoke.:D

We put the small time petty thieves in prison the BIG ones are made Directors of Banks and Lenders!!!

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

SWift have got to prove that our loan was NOT redeemed by the sale of it to Kestrel Loans No 1 Ltd for which they received money.................I believe that they will find that a little difficult as it will be a contradiction of both of those companies accounts.

 

They have presented in their application claim a copy of their legal charge registered at the Land Registry.

 

It does not state what it is for .......just a charge..........it could be for a packet of Crisps........it does not mention........ as Abbey Nationals does that it is a security for monies lent.

 

In legal documents all the i's must be dotted and all the t's crossed.

 

Just letting sparkle72+ know in advance for "transparency" sake, so they can think up an excuse!!

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Webster has just confirmed to the lads in N.Ireland.........."he is still CEO of Swift and will remain".

That also means he is in for a trip to Belfast High Court!!!!

 

Question: Then why doesn't he answer questions ttat are put to him directly and personally instead of being ignorant?????

 

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest blackie

Totally confused now: Swift has this on the web site

They say Swift is not scrutinised, are they confused or is it me.

 

About: Swift Group

Swift is an intermediary only lender that specialises in non-conforming loans and

mortgages. We never seek business directly from consumers.

Swift provide finance for residential and buy-to-let mortgages and secured loans throughout

the UK including Northern Ireland.

Intermediaries can offer Swift’s products with confidence because:

We provide an uncomplicated product range

We have unrestrictive lending criteria and

We deliver market-leading service excellence

The areas where Swift can be of significant help to intermediaries include:

Secured loans up to £250,000…or more

On secured loans where consent has not been given by the first charge lender, Swift

can still lend

Loans and mortgages on unusual properties (for example Wimpey No Fines, Laing

Easiform, high rise flats…and many more)

Customers with a poor credit history (unlimited CCJs, arrears etc)

The ability to take non-standard income such as pensions, benefits and family income

into account

No upper age limit

Swift’s underwriting and processing can be more flexible because all Swift’s lending is held

on balance sheet and is not securitised.

Swift Group is based in Brentwood and has been operating in the UK lending market for

more than 25 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This a UK Data Ltd company monitor alert - to change your alerts or to unsubscribe please loginUK Data Ltd - Company Monitor Alert - 2 December 2009

 

The following changes have taken place on the companies we are monitoring for you:

SWIFT 1ST LIMITED

 

Click here to view company details and filing history

New Documents

 

01/12/2009 - TM02 - Termination of appointment of secretary

 

Click here to buy new document

This a UK Data Ltd company monitor alert - to change your alerts or to unsubscribe please loginUK Data Ltd - Company Monitor Alert - 2 December 2009

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote from Blackies post

 

"We never seek business directly from consumers". False Advert

 

THEY DO THE HAVE MANY DIRECT AGENCIES That seek the business for them

 

I have a written statement from an ex director of one of these agencies saying that his agency was well documented and was given an agency No by Swift ...their purpose was specifically to sell and promote Swifts Loan and mortgages.

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest blackie

God I've just realised it was them who contacted me asking me if I wanted a second loan, their advert said I could have £18,000 within days. So the don't contact consumers direct. I am getting totally confused by everything that is going on. The deeper you all dig, the more I can not believe how this company got away with this. I know that the FSA are currently looking into their dealings, but look how long it took them with GMAC, who were never as bad as Swift.

Link to post
Share on other sites

God I've just realised it was them who contacted me asking me if I wanted a second loan, their advert said I could have £18,000 within days. So the don't contact consumers direct. I am getting totally confused by everything that is going on. The deeper you all dig, the more I can not believe how this company got away with this. I know that the FSA are currently looking into their dealings, but look how long it took them with GMAC, who were never as bad as Swift.

 

Take it from me Blackie it's not the FSA Swift have to worry about........... its the Asset Recovery Unit they have to beware ............;)

Just a couple more pieces of the jig saw needed................. and the Lads in N.Ireland know just where to look for these couple of pieces;)

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest blackie

Hi Sparkie,

 

Just wanted to say we are all behind you for 3rd. I know my friend is watching your case very closely and a few of his friends too. I believe that justice will be served this time. Anymore on the BBC spotlight in Ireland...

 

Take good care of yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparkie,

 

Just wanted to say we are all behind you for 3rd. I know my friend is watching your case very closely and a few of his friends too. I believe that justice will be served this time. Anymore on the BBC spotlight in Ireland...

 

Take good care of yourself.

 

Thank you blackie..............things going nicely with the Spotlight investigation.....remember they have been following Swift very closely for over two years and like Panorama make sure that everything is proven before they broadcast any thing.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being as Mr White has made another Witness statement...it means he will be attending tomorrow's hearing .........I will insist he takes the witness stand .........application hearing or not ..........I want him to deny under oath what he said before under oath at the previous part 20 claim hearing.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest blackie

Sparkie do you know if anyone has tried reporting Swift to these guys

 

Make a complaint: Post: Companies Investigation Branch, Ground Floor, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London,

WC1B 3QW,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie do you know if anyone has tried reporting Swift to these guys

 

 

Make a complaint:

Post: Companies Investigation Branch, Ground Floor, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London,

WC1B 3QW,

 

I have a dossier nearly finished full of facts and documents ready to send to them.;):)

 

sparkie

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie are you going to reveal all after the hearing tomorrow? I wish you luck mate! Can anybody come to court?

 

 

Not sure if the hearing is is open Court or in Judges chambers.......open Court public can attend ....in Chambers they Can't..

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...