Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mbna Cca- Illedgible!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5785 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I today received this CCA from MBNA for a virgin credit card. They went into default on 3rd July, so its a bit late.

 

They sent it printed on one piece of paper the first bit on one side and the second bit on the opposite side (obviously an attempt at making me believe this was originally two sides of the same document!).

 

Although on the suface I think this is probably enforceable, having the prescribed terms etc, BUT it is very illedgible which makes me think they have not photocopied it from the original.

 

Also on the front page you will see there is a pair of scissors above the section saying please sign this form and return to us. then there is a section with virgin address details and ANOTHER pair of scissors!! I have never seen anything like this before and it really makes me think they have 'hashed' this together in an attempt at making an enforecable agreement!

The signature of theirs also looks like it has been added at any time as there is no specific section and no date with it.

Also it is obviously the pre contractual agreement as it says, please issue a virgin credit card to me.

 

I read on here somewhere that just the fact that this is illedgible makes it unenforceable, is this true? Also there is nothing linking the two side from what i can see.

 

Could someone please take a look at it and maybe point me in the right direction for a letter asking them to resend one that i can actually read.

 

They also sent with it a few pages of the current terms and conditions as the charges are £12. On the front of these at the top it says here is a copy of your credit card agreement.

 

I really feel confident that they haven't got the original from what they have sent but from what i have read on here i don't expect them to send anything else and that they will keep on harassing me until the matter goes to court. Is there any way I can demand to see the original before it gets that far?

 

Thanks for any help!!

GIS :-)

 

http://s307.photobucket.com/albums/nn292/amandagreen1980/?action=view&current=mbna23rdJulycca.jpg

 

http://s307.photobucket.com/albums/nn292/amandagreen1980/?action=view&current=mbna23Julycca2.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am shaking!! I have just had a rather irate conversation with a guy from MBNA! He phoned on my mobile from a mobile number and asked if i was "my name" and i said yes and he proceeded to tell me they had my letter under section 78 and he is required to tell me unless i pay ££ now he is passing it to his legal team to start litigation and then asked if i was a home owner, i said yes (is he just trying to scare me here?). There was no questions for data protection or anything!! the same guy phoned me the other day and didn't ask any security questions either but that was before they had received my reply that the cca was illegible. I stated that he couldn't start litigation while the account was in dispute because the ca they sent was illegible. He asked if i was willing to pay now and i said no not until you send me a valid cca that i can actually read. He said they had done that, he asked if i had paid the £1 for it and i said yes of course and he said that in my last letter stating the cca was illegible that i hadn't sent the cca back!!! i said no i didn't but you have obviously got a copy of it there! He said can i ask you to hold on to that to prove in court what we have sent you a valid legible cca, i said of course i will hold onto it to prove it is illegible! I then said if this goes to court then you would need the original cca and i have asked politely in a letter for a photocopy straight from the original so i can read it properly so why not just send me a copy straight from the original. He said they had, i said no it was obviously scanned it on a computer. He then said he is not getting into a conversation about it anymore unless i pay and i said oh i have to listen to you but you won't listen to me. he said he can't get into a discussion about it. I said well if you can't send me a better copy of the cca then you had better take me to court then, he said the file is being passed to their legal team for litigation TODAY!!!

I asked if anyone was going to replying to my letter in writing and he said the legal team will.

 

I AM VERY SCARED NOW!!! I don't mind admitting it!!

 

I mean the cca does look valid but there are some dodgy things about it (see above) so i really don't think they have the original, but why would the take me to court if they haven't got the original? it doesn't make sense!!

 

Am i right in thinking if they take me to court and show up with the original it will look bad on them for not cooperating with me and sending me a good copy of the original so i would then pay them and not waste the courts time?

 

This seems to have progressed a lot quicker than others on this site!! I have had threatening letters as such yet. Just one threatening to default me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GIS

 

Calm Down

 

Why are you speaking to these to muppets on the phone anyway thats their intention to get you rattled.No more phone converations everything in writing. IMHO the CCA you have posted is totaly unenforcable I cant see any persribed terms.

 

Regards

Andy;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks!

I don't know why i spoke to him! He caught me off guard with the mobile number! I am so annoyed with myself for speaking to them! I usually do just say can you put everything in writing!!

 

I know that is exactly what they wanted, to get me scared like that!

 

Thanks for replying! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What makes you think its enforcable?

 

Regards

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I don't know. It has my signature on it on the front. It has the sentence that relates to the credit limit on the back and the apr and something about payments. BUT there is nothing to link the front and back, AND on the front there are 2 scissors so it looks a bit like a cut and paste job so I was confident they hadn't got the original was IF it was enforceable but they made me lose my confidence in that phone call, which is their aim!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I say it has all thos things on the back ie the 'prescribed terms' but i can't actually read it properly, i can make out odd words and know they are part of sentences that i have read on my other cca's. I genuinely can't read it all and it is a really bad copy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone

I received a ltter replying to my letter saying the CCA is illegible and requesting a legible copy, they are not sending me anything else!! I have posted it below.

 

Image of mbna cca reply - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

 

Also I have received a default notice now. Could someone look at it and see if it is correct. They shouldn't be able to issue a default notice until they comply with my request should they?

 

Image of mbna default1 - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

 

What do i do in response to both their letters? reply saying they can't issue a default yet or just ignore them now until they take me to court?

 

Thanks

GIS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GIS

 

As tinker says not a default note.Can you post up the letter you sent in response minus personal info of course.They can issue a Default as you are in arrears irrespective of your complaint.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...