Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Reclaim Overdraft Charges from RBS - Scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5614 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

What you do now depends on how many charges you are reclaiming and how far back they go. As you may already know, you can only claim back upto 5 years of charges in Scotland (as opposed to 6 years in England and Wales).

 

The current OFT case could take years yet. If the OFT win at the High Court, the Banks could appeal at the high court, then the House of Lords and if needed, they can appeal all the way to the European Courts. This could take anywhere from 2-5years.

 

In Scotland, there is a different judicial system. Many courts in Scotland will still hear your case if you provide a good Statement of Claim. Even if the bank sists (stays) your claim, you can appeal to have the sist lifted. Advice is available at Govan Community Law Centre, Glasgow, Scotland | Free legal resources If I were you, I would not wait. You should file your claim now at your local Sheriff Court if you live in Scotland. If you don't, maybe you can use the address of someone you know that lives there.

 

I am about to take RBS to court for just under £200. They had until today to respond to my letter before I take court action. I am also taking another bank to court if they do not respond within 14 days for about £600.

 

Good Luck with what you do. Best of Luck in Reclaiming what is Rightfully Yours!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Yes. You are Correct. You do not need to do anything until the day after the return date.

 

If BOS has applied for a sist, the court will inform you of this and whether they have accepted the sist or not and what action to take next.

 

Good Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Do I need to go there? as my prelim hearing date is on 22nd Jan

 

Procedure is not something I am totally clued up on but I do believe that you will have to attend on the 17th December.

 

This is where you can put your argument to the Sheriff on why the case should not be sisted. If you do not attend, then the Sheriff may grant the defender the sist until the outcome of the Test Case.

 

There is help on the Govan Community Law Centre, Glasgow, Scotland | Free legal resources website. They have case law on why cases in Scotland should not be sisted.

 

Good Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is up to you if you attend or not. If you attend and the Banks' Solicitors dont attend, then you can ask the Sheriff to Setlle the Claim there and then since the banks' Solicitors did not turn up, they are obviously wasting the courts time.

 

I do know however, that if the Banks' Solcitors turn up and you don't, the Sheriff most certainly will Sist the case.

 

The Scottish Legal System is different to the English System. In England, some cases are being sisted automatically, but in Scotland, the law gives you the right to pursue your action. If you give the Sheriff the reason that "it infringes your Human Rights as there is no end in sight to the Test Case in England and Wales (a Foreign Court, I may add), which could go on for years to come with appeals to the House of Lords and the European Courts of Justice. You have the right to have your case heard within a certain time period without protracted delays."

 

Good Luck with what you decide. Remember there is a buddy system on here. You can search to find someone living close to you who will go to court with you to help you out.

 

The Sheriff will be there to help you. He will ask you some questions and ask you what you want to do next. It is usually held in private (in the Sheriff's Chambers).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best way would be to create a thread and ask people what they think of the buddy system. Read theri opinions and then decide.

 

If you decide to use the buddy system, just click on the link at the top of the page and search for a buddy in your post code.

 

Good Luck Again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...