Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
    • The clock is ticking for savings providers. They now have just a few weeks left to get their act together and start offering loyal customers a good deal.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5812 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, every1 am having problem's with bailiffs, and hoping someone can advise me on what i should be doing.

Sorry if explanation is a bit long...

I managed to get myself into arrears with my 2007 council tax and my account was passed to Jacobs, I made an arrangement over the phone to pay weekly but then managed to fall behind with these. I had a visit on Friday from a very unpleasant man, who informed me i have until Monday to pay him £1153 (about £300 more than i believe I owed). I contacted him later that night to say there was no way I could afford to pay that amount, but could pay some of it when he came on Monday, He told me he would only accept the full amount, and if I didn't pay he would be applying for a commital order. I told him I wouldn't be answering the door to him as I just can't pay it all. He then said I had no chioce as he has a Levy and walking possesion order that i have signed, so he could enter my home at any time. (I have never signed anything.)

 

This is really worrying me as I don't know what to do when he calls on monday and i cant pay that amount of money.

Any advice would be very much appreciated. Thanks

Edited by smad
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to put your mind at ease, no bailiff can take anything if you did not sign any 'walking possession' form and if you do not let him in. As you say this one sounds not only unpleasant, but one who will quite happily lie and intimidate you just to achieve his aim of earning commission from your problems.

 

As far as his threat of committal proceedings, it's not for him to decide. He's just a private citizen. You are highly unlikely to be arrested for struggling to pay council tax. For the proceedure to commit anybody to prison, see my answer under thread 9 - 'Help I am going to be arrested'.

 

Also you only have to pay what is written on the liability order. Nothing more. So you can cut this man out of your life and deprive him and his organisation of any fees. Just pay the council and never bother to talk to this man again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair Parking is absolutely right - but you need to write to the council - tell them that you will pay £x a week/month whatever you can reasonably afford direct to them. You need to tell them that you are paying only in respect of council tax not in respect of an alleged bailiff fees/charges. Tell them that you are not prepared to deal with their bailiffs.

 

Send a copy of the letter to the Bailiffs with a covering letter telling them that you are not going allow them access and are not going to deal with them.

 

Committal - A decision to apply to commit is taken by the Local Authority - it is extremely difficult to send anyone to prison for non payment of council tax. The Council have to prove basically that you've had the money to pay it and decided not to - if you have paid the council something - however small, although at least £3 a week off the arrears - it is almost impossible to send someone to prison. So don't worry about that they won't even try...

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

That said there would potentially be an advantage to a commital hearing - the magistrates have a power to remit some of the debt - so what they do is work out what you can afford say £5 a week - multiply that by 52 or up to 156 - (one to three years) which gives them a figure they then cancel whatever else is owed above that amount - it's called remission

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Fair-Parking and I've got no money, that put's my mind at rest for now.

I will send letters to Jacobs and the council first thing Monday morning

 

Have rang Jacobs office today to ask for a copy of whatever I am supposed to have sighned and the woman on the phone said they don't have any of the things the man implied.

 

 

The man I spoke to said My case has been to court, should I have received a letter telling me it was going to court if this is the case?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - your case would have gone to court - the magistrates court in the first instance to allow the council to get a liability order - the council would have told you - all they have to show is that you hadn't paid and that you were in default of the instalments. It is a routine almost automatic process - the council do dozens at the same time. The court issues a liability order which then allows the council to send in the bailiffs. If the bailiffs can't collect the money they notify the council who then have to consider what they do next. If by that point you are paying them direct there's not much that they can do - if you haven't paid them anything then they can at that point apply for committal to prison. You would then get a summons from the court.

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

When writing you need to ensure that you also ask for details of what fees have been added to your account. I would hazard a guess that you have been charged an "attending to remove/enforcement fee" on the basis that you have somehow "defaulted" on a payment arrangement. You need to ask....what arrangement ? Was anything in writing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a visit on Friday from a very unpleasant man, who informed me i have until Monday to pay him £1153 (about £300 more than i believe I owed)....

 

...He told me he would only accept the full amount, and if I didn't pay he would be applining for a commital order.

 

The bailiff is using intimidation. Bailiffs do not apply for committal orders - the council does.

 

I told him I wouldn't be answering the door to him as I just can't pay it all. He then said I had no chioce as he has a Levy and walking possesion order that i have signed, so he could enter my home at any time. (I have never signed anything.)

 

He has committed an offence under Section 4 for the Fraud Act 2006 for falsifying as document to obtain a money transfer for himself or another. Make sure he doesn't know your signature.

 

The man I spoke to said My case has been to court, should I have received a letter telling me it was going to court if this is the case?

 

You should have received a notice from the Council they intend to apply to the court for a liability order.

 

I would hazard a guess that you have been charged an "attending to remove/enforcement fee"

 

I concur with that.

 

Write to the council with your proposal to pay the arrears enclosing the first installment, something like this:

 

Name of council

Council Tax arrears section

Address 1

Address 2

Address 3

Address 4

 

[DATE]

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Your council tax account [REFERENCE] Arrears £[AMOUNT]

 

I understand you are seeking to recover arrears of council tax and instructed bailiffs.

 

On [DATE] the bailiff committed criminal offences under Sections 2 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006 and the matter automatically passed to the authorities. He said he would apply for a 'committal order' and send me to 'prison' he I didn't pay according to his deadline. The bailiff also claimed to have a 'walking possessions' agreement, as this is untrue, he is seeking to defrauded me in fees. The criminal element of this matter has been passed to the bailiffs certificating court.

 

Due to my circumstances I am unable to pay the debt in whole and will make payment of £[AMOUNT] each month for [NUMBER OF] monthly installments.

 

This may seem a long time but it’s the only offer I can afford and it allows me to pay future Council Tax liabilities without falling into arrears, and I am not refusing to pay this debt.

 

Meanwhile, please provide me with a written breakdown of the arrears by return post.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

[YOUR NAME]

Enc, 1st instalment £[AMOUNT]

 

 

 

Now dealing with the bailiff, download a Form 4 here. http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/form4_0606.pdf

 

Ask the bailiff which court issued his certificate, and in the 'Details of Complaint' field enter the following (amend as necessary) and post it to the bailiff's certificating court.

 

On [DATE] the bailiff Mr. [NAME] knocked at the door of my home collecting council tax arrears and told me to pay £1152 by Monday [DATE].

 

I told him I could not pay that amount by that deadline and offered a more reasonable one I could afford. The Bailiff responded by saying he would apply for a 'committal order' and send me to 'prison' he I didn't pay according to his deadline.

 

The bailiff continued to say he was holding a 'walking possessions' agreement, and this entitled him entitled to break into my home and recover goods to the value of the debt and his fees.

 

I understand the bailiff is using unlawful force and falsifying a legal document to make a higher gain in fees than he would otherwise make and commits an offence under Section 4 of the Fraud Act 2006.

 

I also understand that Bailiffs cannot not apply for committal orders as this is at the discretion of the Council under Section 47 of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and the bailiff is abusing his position of authority.

 

I respectfully ask that I am compensated for the bailiff’s misfeasance and the inconvenience it has caused me in seeking discovery of information.

First to fly the Airbus A380

Link to post
Share on other sites

tomtubby I did receive a letter from jacobs saying they had agreed to the installments I offered to pay, that is all it says and nothing has ever been signed by me.

 

wwow, Thanks for the letter, have downloaded form and will be sending payment to council tomorrow.

 

Thank you all for your help, it is very much appreciated!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets just hope none of you whom have replied to this thread end up in court to back up your actions as it would be a complete mess, In the first posters post it states quite clearly the bailiff said he could return and enter the property, QUITE CLEARLY as someone has implied in the letter they suggest sending to the courts, NOT TO BREAK IN, please be careful when you give advice and read the threads properly and dont misinterpret what you want it to read!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kermit. Be more specific. What exactly do you mean by 'misinterpretation? Who has misinterpreted what?

 

 

Read through the thread again from top to bottom and i think you will see what i mean, but i refer to SMADS first posts of what happens and then the letter stating what he should say to the councils , Courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps I'm missing something but if you're told by the householder that I'm not going to let you in and you tell them that I don't need your permission I've got a WP - isn't there a strong inference that you're going to force your way in - isn't that how intimidation works

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...