Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I am reading through the full thread and will continue to research. I have come across a reference to a form called N180 DQ in the thread, but I cannot see any reference to this form in my case nor can I see it on the MoneyClaim website. Should I have been sent this form? Thanks 
    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Council Loft Conversion Woes


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5917 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

A number of years back my company collapsed and( when property became unaffordable to the ordinary punter!) we ended up in council accomodation. Having been here for a while we decided to apply for a loft extension as the place is pitifully small.

 

We sent a nicely worded letter to the local authority but within days were sent a reply flatly turning us down and also saying that even if we bought the place we still couldn't convert because the council would own the freehold and wouldn't give permission.

 

My blood was boiling but I had to swallow.

 

However, we are now expecting another baby, nearly 17 years between them, and this means our already rabbit hutch size maisonette will become even more crowded! Our own room hasn't enough space to even walk around the bed and our daughter often has her boyfriend and friends staying, she works until late in the evening and it's unfair (and against council housing policy apparently) to expect her to share her already cramped room with a baby.

 

So, we applied again, this time with more weight to our case and the fact that since our previous application 3 of our neighbours have had extensions carried out to their maisonettes both to the upper and ground floors. The precedent had been set so we were almost drawing up plans for the new space.

 

No such luck...again within days we had yet another knock back saying the council NEVER EVER EVER give permission to extend maisonettes...except if the houses belong to our neighbours it appears.

 

So, bearing in mind other people have had it done and since doing them, both have since sold up and moved on (yes, they improved the properties and then sold, making an extra £80k for £20k's work!) surely we are entitled to be treated equally...what is good for the goose must surely be good for the gander? Right?

 

I've since written again with my case but this time haven't heard back as yet, but in the meantime I'm looking at my options.

 

Can I take the council to court for seemingly allowing my neighbours to have extensions and not us? Not only that every time I look out of my window I see these 2 massive dormers hanging off the roof and it's just rubbing my nose in it! All the while I'm banging into things in this shoe box, unable to move or improve the property. (average price on 3 bed house in our area is £380,000-North East Surrey)

 

Does anyone have any idea where I stand or who I should approach regarding my dilemma?

 

Thanks in advance. DH.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably neighbours who have extended their properties are owner-occupiers and are therefore entitled to apply for planning permission and make improvements. As a tenant you do not have that right without the express agreement of the Council, so any legal challenge would fail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it not just be easy to get on the housing exchange list for your area?

 

The housing association will be under a legal obligation to make sure that you are properly housed, so when your new baby comes along you should be able to claim that you are overcrowded, and this in turn moves you up the housing list.

 

We owned our own property but it was a 2 bed with an 8 yr old girl and 6 yr old boy sharing a room. We were on the list for six months before the housing association gave us a 3 bed property with front and rear gardens and a drive.

 

Unfortunately as long as the housing association own the property they can stop you adding an extension. It sounds like your neighbours bought their properties before making the alterations so the housing association would no longer have a say as to what happened to the house.

Lowell Financial - No CCA available

NDR - CCA request sent 08/04

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably neighbours who have extended their properties are owner-occupiers and are therefore entitled to apply for planning permission and make improvements. As a tenant you do not have that right without the express agreement of the Council, so any legal challenge would fail.

 

I have to agree entirely with Michael and any legal challenge is doomed with you definitely lossing and paying all costs.

 

Sorry, as I know it is not the answer you want. The neighbours you see around you have bought and that is different entirely.

 

This is based on the council house situation in Scotland, where I worked for 28 years.

 

Try a move through their waiting list for a transfer or an exchange with someone looking for a smaller house. The council can give advice on how to do this. There is also the possibility of applying to local housing associations who might be an option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...