Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
    • upload sites dont retain copies and so what if they do... what do you think they are going to do, kidnap your grannies budgie or something..how the hell would any of the info required by us be of any use to them..... stop being paranoid and put them all in one mass multipage pdf.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC rip off charges Help Please !!


MIKEY DABODEE
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

have a look at this link mike - from #231 - it's not conclusive , but I haven't seen any other interpretation yet......... :confused::)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/cases-stayed-pending-oft/112990-hearing-remove-stay-12.html

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It means no change for us for the time being :| however this is obviously concerning HH Justice Smith and therefor probably a good many judges will have the same opinion that this could take longer than necessary.

 

I think this is an indication that the high court is starting to realise there is a danger that they are just being used by the banks to delay things, a very similar point of view many county court judges have in our own claims.

 

pete

Edited by Castlebest
Link to post
Share on other sites

To issue a claim form where your claim is for money only and the amount is:

up to £300 £30

£300.01 – £500 £45

£500.01 – £1,000 £65

£1,000.01 – £1,500 £75

£1,500.01 – £3,000 £85

£3,000.01 – £5,000 £108

£5,000.01 – £15,000 £225

£15,000.01 – £50,000 £360

 

£50,000.01 – £100,000 £630

£100,000.01 – £150,000 £810

£150,000.01 – £200,000 £990

£200,000.01 – £250,000 £1,170

£250,000.01 – £300,000 £1,350

over £300,000 or for an unlimited amount £1,530

 

:)

Edited by freakyleaky
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

evening all, how aI re things looking on the bank charges front,

I have been busy of late and havent filed my claim at court

 

update I paid my overdraft off the other day with the charges it had reaached over £900 and the they wouldnt listen to any offers of monthly payments

my friend put the money on their card

because I am desperately trying to sort my cra files out

 

when i phoned to pay they accused me off fraud

I am very angry and intend to make a complaint, any ideas to what I can say and should I file my court case

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mikey, welcome back :)

 

Not a lot been happening on the bank charges front - claims are still stayed and the banks are still charging :(

 

However , this shouldn't stop you from lodging your claim with the court - from the time you lodge it ,it attracts 8% interest and you will be 'in the system ' when the thing is resolved, as I believe it will be.

 

I don't think you'll get much joy out of a complaint for something that happened on the phone, they'll just deny it - unless you've got it recorded? But if it makes you feel better to put them on the spot for it............... then have a go by all means.

 

But your priority should be your claim........ it's your money - you want it back......:)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

whats the latest news on the bank charges front ???

 

is it looking hopefull ?????

 

as expected had no reply to my complaint, after clearing the balance last month they still managed to put another 82p interest on this month

 

havent submitted my claim yet due to having to find above

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mikey, nice to hear from you again , :)

 

The position is very much the same as before, with the banks appealing every ruling and generally being a pain as usual.

 

However , we are still optimistic and the view on the forum is that claimants should proceed to the 'stayed in court' stage. At least that way you're in the queue and the interest of 8% is building up from then on.......

 

So, if you want to go for it , I reckon you've still got plenty of time.

:D

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Have ve read the banks are going to appeal to the House of Lords

against losing the case

so its not over yet

but should I still go to court

have had a very tight year so far,

and have done nothing with my claim since last year.

My account with them is still open and has a small in the black balance but receive no statement

I would have to pay to take my claim to court and money is tight, what

do you advise please

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all over bar the shouting , mike , but these disgusting banks are going to do plenty of that - :mad: . They have been refused permission by the High Court to appeal to the HOL , so they are going to apply to the HOL for permission to appeal .........

 

Meanwhile , the general feeling on the site here is that , if at all possible you should get your claim into court - stayed , but earning 8% interest while it waits.

This is best explained by Mr Lex one of the Site Team on here:

Why you should start claim (courtesy of Mr Lex)

Remember, you need to get your claim to court

 

When you start to send off your letters, they will probably try to tell you you can't claim because the case's are 'stayed' It is important that you ignore this and carry on, only the courts can put a 'stay' on your claim

 

Although the banks have a ongoing test case with OFT there are a number of reasons why you should start to claim at court now

 

Any older charges (coming up to 6 years) could be lost if you wait for the OFT case to end. Start your claim now and those charges are protected

 

(you are supposed to be protected by the 'waiver', we now know you are not

When the stays are finally lifted, you will be one of the first in the queue to get paid

 

Once the courts are involved, you get the 8% interest

 

While the banks are protected by the stays, we the consumer, have no such protection and charges continue to mount up

 

For some people this may mean going into default. If it is clear that the default was made in respect of charges and that it was lodged after a charges claim was begun then these users have a really excellent chance of having it removed

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/data-protection-default-issues/164871-castlebests-default-removal.html#post1772646

 

So, although I realise money may be tight in this current climate mike , if you can find a way to get your claim to court .... go for it ! :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi everyone

looking at the charge for taking my claim to court I think we have scrapped it together,

 

whats the first step I have the list of charges somewhere on my computer

 

its ages since I have looked into this but hope to get it to moving again this week

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi everyone

looking at the charge for taking my claim to court I think we have scrapped it together,

 

Well done Mike , in the opinion of this site it will be worth going the whole hog ! :)

 

whats the first step I have the list of charges somewhere on my computer

 

Hopefully you've got a spreadsheet with your charges on it , which has been racking up the interest for you daily .......

its ages since I have looked into this but hope to get it to moving again this week

 

It is now generally accepted the the best way to submit a claim is through your local county court as opposed to online ..... so you need to get a Form N1 from your local court and fill it in thus :

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates/113-4-particulars-of-claim-n1-updated-version-now-available.html

 

Your spreadsheet should be summarised under the last entries thus :

 

Amount of charges reclaimed @ (date )__£ ..............

 

S 69 Interest @8% to (date)__________ £..............

 

Court Fees_________________________ £..............

 

Total Amount Claimed________________ £...............

 

Come back if you need more help Mike , best of Luck ..... :D

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi mikey , welcome back :)

 

No ,we haven't lost ...... the OFT lost by using the wrong argument .

 

However , you can get your claim to court shortly using revised POCs which the team are working on as we speak ....... should be out in a few days or so I think........

 

Just hang about for a few days and keep your eye on the site for developments ... :D

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Have a look at Pete(Castlebest's) thread mikey ..... particularly this ;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-2664368.html

 

It's a waiting game at the moment , until we get guidance from the legal guys .... but a holding letter will let them know what your intentions are ....

and keep an eye on the 'Announcements' at the top of the HSBC forum page to see further developments ..

Of course , come back and ask if you're in any doubt . :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...