Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Kitchen Fiasco


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5867 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They seem to be impling that the 'gas pipe problem' is preventing the fitting of the kitchen. It isnt, its the bad design on behalf of the consultant that is preventing the kitchen being fitted. Take away the gas pipe problem and you are still left with an unrealistic scenario because of the oven/fridge issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ask them how they are going to fix the end panels in position. What are they going to fix them to? Normally on the end of a run you would have an 'end support panel' which is rigid and weight bearing for a worktop. Either side of a built in oven you would have 'oven end panels' but you need a cabinet next to them to fix them to, you cant just prop a panel between 2 appliances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably they mean to fix this to the wall then but I still dont see how it can work, an oven housing unit should not be free standing, it shoiuld be contained in the middle of other units to hold it rigid. Of course what you decide to do is completly your decision but I would be very wary about this company. Just out of intrest, is the person who is telling you how they would fit the job the same person that did the plan because he wasnt too bright to start with was he so please be careful about accepting them for the work. The thing is that at the moment you do have the option of getting the deposit back and getting someone more competent to do the work. If you accept them to do the fit and they mess up you may not find it as easy to get satisfaction if it goes wrong again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's pretty clear we do not want this company carrying out any work on our property. There is clearly no incentive for them to do a decent job now anyway. I'd be concerned corners would be cut to compensate for the loss of money to this point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then go for option 1, writing to them with the proviso that you do not accept that no compensation is due to you and that you expect to hear what their proposition of compensation is within 7 days. On receipt of their response, you can then either agree to no 1 in writing and specify that you will seek compensation through the courts since they are being unreasonable or accept whatever they decide to offer, obviously it will depend on what they reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks bookworm,

 

I sent a letter yesterday providing them with a date to collect their goods and commented this gave them enough time to ensure my deposit was returned beforehand. I also gave them a figure for consequential damages, not compensation and advised that this would go to county court if not provided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't let them take the goods until you are refunded - it's a lien. If they don't refund - they don't get their goods (which you can later sell on to reclaim some money back) AND you get to chase them for the rest. Hopefully it won't come to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, does anyone know where we stand on this? I don't want to give the goods back until my deposit has been returned but can I do that?

 

They wouldn't have given me the goods until I paid the deposit so it seems only fair it should work the other way round.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on, I am in full muppet mode.

 

consumer Credit Act s. 72 states taht any goods supplied must be returned SUBJECT TO....

 

s. 70(2) which states that if, under the terms of a cancelled agreement, the debtor (you) is in possession of goods, he shall have a lien on them for any sum repayable to him (under the terms of the agreement) in respect of that agreement.

 

I KNEW i seen that somewhere!

 

So yes, under the CCA, you have a right to keep possession of those goods until you are re-imbursed, but I would appreciate someone else confirming this

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I'm here, once they do agree to collect. Is it ok for me to request the delivery guys sign something to the effect everything was in good order before it left my property? I don't really trust the company anymore and the last thing I need is for the delivery men to drop the oven taking it back and not owning up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can ask. As to whethr thy will or not is a different matter. Why not take photos as evidence of their current state?

 

I am pretty sure on what I said about the CCA and lien - i'm just a bit of a self doubter!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thta's down to them to prove. If you have evidence tha they were not in such a state when in your care, then they will have a pretty hard job proving otherwise. Also, if yo did claim in court, the court would probably see something like that as petty andcould kick it out. But I would wait until it's picked up firt - it might not happen!

 

Do take photos though definitely and do ask them to sign (they may not) something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if it's in boxes which were left unopened, they could hardly try to say that you had damaged them then. Take pictures of unopened boxes to show that the items were never opened in your home, that will clearly show that you couldn't possibly be responsible for any (alleged) damage! :rolleyes:

 

Can't help with the lien part, I don't know that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fed up uk

I've been away for a week in soggy Wales so I am just catching up.

 

I still cannot believe that this valve was missed out on the survey.

 

The row in your kitchen that is the problem was it a built under oven and fridge?

 

Is there not the option of a built in oven in a tall unit therefor having a cupboard underneath allowing the gas valve to be exposed? Do you have a window in the way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fed up uk

I've been away for a week in soggy Wales so I am just catching up.

 

I still cannot believe that this valve was missed out on the survey.

 

The row in your kitchen that is the problem was it a built under oven and fridge?

 

Is there not the option of a built in oven in a tall unit therefor having a cupboard underneath allowing the gas valve to be exposed? Do you have a window in the way?

 

Hi Wino,

 

No the wall the oven is on, isn't big enough for a tall housing. We'd lose what little worktop space there is and there wouldn't be anywhere for the hob with suitable space either side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, well they had the letter last thursday, and in it I gave them the date of tomorrow to collect their kitchen from our property and stated this gave them "enough time to return the deposit beforehand". Just a blanket letter received on Monday saying the case is "being investigated". Exactly the same letter as the previous two. Anyone think they're dragging their heels with this???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...