Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can I transfer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

At the moment I am paying Npower a £xxx three figure amount per month for my dual fuel, after a year of disputing opening readings, during which they have issued a dozen bills varying from £130 to £1400+,

 

As of Nov 07 (according to them) I owe them £700+. I dispute this very strongly

 

This amount will have reduced since then.

 

I went this morning to one of the online "energy switch sites" and transferred from Nower to another supplier.

 

Question: Is it the normal practice of NPower to block such a transfer, or will they allow the transfer, issue a final bill and then start the usual pay me or else routine?

 

any help would be useful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Npower will block any transfer, as I've learned to my cost, for whatever reason they can (or that is my experience of them).

 

If you can give us a little more detail about the problems you have been having, perhaps we can help.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a house in July 2006, due to work commitments, I didn't move into my house until well after the Christmas, in the April of 2007 I received combined bills for £1400+

 

I've been right through their complaints procedure, had about a dozen different bills with widely ranging amounts as mentioned above. sent a letter to their managing director, who kindly referred it back to the people who had screwed it all up in the first place.

 

even let that fella off the telly have a go for me, but because the meters weren't faulty so they dropped it. as soon as the \media got involved, they dug their heels in and claimed that the readings they had previously agreed were wrong, were suddenly completely accurate, leaving me with an alleged debt of £700+.

 

This is on top of the £100 I pay them every month

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

my undestanding is that if you are a domestic customer and you pay by DD, that your supplier is not allowed to block any transfer. This was certainly how it worked when I ran a complaints team for Atlantic.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Co-op bank - won March 07

Virgin Credit Card - won - March 07

MBNA Credit Card - won March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a house in July 2006, due to work commitments, I didn't move into my house until well after the Christmas, in the April of 2007 I received combined bills for £1400+

 

I've been right through their complaints procedure, had about a dozen different bills with widely ranging amounts as mentioned above. sent a letter to their managing director, who kindly referred it back to the people who had screwed it all up in the first place.

 

even let that fella off the telly have a go for me, but because the meters weren't faulty so they dropped it. as soon as the \media got involved, they dug their heels in and claimed that the readings they had previously agreed were wrong, were suddenly completely accurate, leaving me with an alleged debt of £700+.

 

This is on top of the £100 I pay them every month

 

We are having a similar problem with SSE (under Atlantic brand) differing bills, we gave them a read, never heard from them, phoned them and were told that the account was clear. Then nearly a year later and no letters or contact from them. we get a debt collection letter and a demand for money which ismore than they originally wanted. The staff were rude and agressive and we aren't going to back down.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Co-op bank - won March 07

Virgin Credit Card - won - March 07

MBNA Credit Card - won March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I would stand your ground and make lots of noise.

 

It looks (up to now) like my transfer to an alternative supplier is going through.

 

After all the sh@t they've given me, they even had the nerve to send me a "sorry you're leaving us" letter. unbelievable!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...