Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can I Stay Away From Home?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5930 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am finding trouble getting any guidance at all on this problem, so I hope someone here can help.

 

I am divorced and live with my adult son in our own house, and pay full council tax. Two or three nights a week I stay with my fiancee, who lives about 100 miles away.

 

She receives the single-person discount, and is worried that she might be breaking the rules by letting me stay over. At first I thought her concern was laughable, as I pay full council tax on my own place, but she won't be placated on this.

 

I can't find anything definitive on this on the Web. Can anybody help, or has anybody heard of a similar case?

 

Thanks in adfvance, Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

See here:

Council Tax discounts, exemptions and financial help : Directgov - Home and community

 

 

Council Tax Discounts

 

There are various discounts that you may be eligible to claim to reduce your bill.

The full Council Tax bill assumes that there are at least two adults living in a home. If only one adult lives in a home (as their main home), the Council Tax is reduced by 25 per cent. The bill doesn't increase if there are more than two adults in the home.

Certain people aren't counted when working out the number of adults who live in your home. If the home isn't anyone's main home, then a discount may also apply.

You can check the detail about discounts and people who aren't counted in sections 10 to 13 of the leaflet 'Council Tax - a guide to your bill'.

You can also use the links below to check eligibility and to apply online. The page you go to will ask you to enter details of where you live and then take you to your local authority website where you can find out more. (If the online service isn't yet available you'll be given contact details for your local authority.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much, Michael, for your prompt reply and your guidance notes.

 

I have read all the notes very carefully, and I can't see any item which refers specifically, or even generally, to my situation, so I guess there is no guidance for it.

 

I still firmly believe that this is a situation in which common sense should apply. The Government, via the local authority, is receiving a full council tax payment from me, and three-quarters from my fiancee. Should I

make up her payment to the full amount, and stop paying tax on my own house,the Government would be out of pocket.

 

In any case, as I spend more time at my own house than at my fiancee's, surely that qualifies my own house as my main residence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are various discounts that you may be eligible to claim to reduce your bill.

The full Council Tax bill assumes that there are at least two adults living in a home. If only one adult lives in a home (as their main home), the Council Tax is reduced by 25 per cent.

 

Surely it comes under this statement :) As its not your main home then you dont count :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your view, Saintly.

 

I like it mostly because it's my view in a nutshell, but it's good to hear someone else say I'm on the right track.

 

I shall return to my fiancee and attempt to put her mind at rest again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I very much doubt that you would have to pay even under the strictest interpretation of the law. However it might be worth asking your fiancée to make an anonymous telephone enquiry to her council to set her mind at rest. You don't have to give your name when making a general enquiry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply, sohoscribbler. I tried your suggestion about an anonymous enquiry before I posted this question, but just received the usual bunkum about each case being judged on its merits, and requiring names etc before giving an answer. It looks like a dead end as far as a definitive answer is concerned, but thanks for your support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...