Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Alliance & leics (equity) car insurance ...cancellation charge


davzer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out car insurance with A&L via online. I set the insurance to have no excess on the policy and was given a price of £293, which I thought good for a group 17 car. I paid online.

 

7 days later a letter arrives asking for proof of my no claims, which I posted to them ( took me 5 days to find it! lol) I then get my documents after another week but with a £200 excess on the policy and a request for a further £42!

 

I phoned and told them I was unhappy, but they wouldn't do anything, so I cancelled the policy, for which they have invoiced me for £45. I have refused to pay. I consider this most underhand, lure you in via the deal on the website and then renege on the deal and ask for more money! extortion!

 

I took screenshots of the quoted deal and what it included when I paid online, do they have to honour this deal? Do I have to pay cancellation charge? Should I report this to trading standards?

 

Any advice most welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

First of all lets try and clear up a few things to give you the best advise possible.

1) how long was the policy in force before you cancelled it? If it was within the first 14 days then there's no cancellation charge as you automatically get a 14 day cooling off period under FSA regulations.

 

2) you say they sent you a letter asking you for an extra £42, what was this for? was it due to a problem with NCD or a undisclosed claim or something?

 

3) when you say that you cancelled the policy, presumably you asked them to cancel the policy when you were on the phone to them and didn't just cancel the direct debit.

 

 

 

DA

If you find the advice I give is useful, then please feel free to click the scales :)

 

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Darkangelsdelite,

The 14 days were up, due to the xmas holiday slowing things down and my difficulty in digging out my renewal from my 'special' filing system.

The extra £42 was because I put my renewal as £324 but it was £347, I didn't have my renewal when I got the quote online, as I was getting quotes in preparation for my renewal, so i put down what I paid previously as it would be close.

The increase of £200 excess is unforgivable when I was quoted no excess on the website, they didn't even let me know by writing, they just added it on in the documents.:mad:

 

I have cancelled the policy on the phone and then cancelled my direct debit.

 

I'm going back to sainsburys car insurance who have now quoted me £327.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so as i see it: You were outside your 14 day cooling off period meaning that they are within their rights to charge you at the least for the "time on risk" plus potentially a cancellation fee to cover the costs of setting up the policy. So in this case, i don't really see you have a lot of choice here other than to pay up as you've had the cover.

 

The £42 was basically cos they agreed to "beat your renewal quote" or something then when you renewal quote was sent to them for verification, the figure was higher than you told them so they amended their quote to take this into account.

To be honest, that sounds fair to me. They gave you a price based on the info you gave them, the info then turned out to be in-accurate so they rightfully corrected their quote based on the correct info, in this case in generated and extra £42 premium but this would have been included in the original quote had the info you gave them been correct in the first place.

 

As far as your XS goes, I cant see any logical reason why the XS on the docs would differ from what you were told on-line. The only thing i can think of is that you are perhaps getting your voluntary and compulsory XS's mixed up. You say you set the policy up with "zero XS" I can only assume that means a zero VOLUNTARY XS as i cant see a group 17 car not having some kind of compulsory XS as its no doubt a sports car of some sort so will be a high risk. My guess would be that the £200 XS is actually the compulsory XS that applies to the vehicle due to the group rating and is therefore also correct.

Only way to check this out is to call them up and see what they say.

 

 

Hope This Helps

 

 

DA

If you find the advice I give is useful, then please feel free to click the scales :)

 

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...