Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wills, probate, executors and the law - HELP PLEASE!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4541 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Theywontwin

 

I myself am dealing with Probate, regarding my late partner dying intestate in 2000 and our son having a share of the estate.. As you may have found out, Probate is a messy can of worms and not nice to deal with.

 

From what I know, the executors shouldn't have made any movements on the assets before Probate was granted - if they have, and the estate suffered a loss, there MAY be potential to recover this - you would need this confirmed of course, and to find out your complete rights in this aspect.

 

Regarding informing you as to the sale of the house - I am assuming you are a beneficiary of the estate? - I do believe you have the right to be kept informed of movements of assets forming the estate, again, seek confirmation of this.. If you believe you are being deliberately kept in the dark over affairs within the estate and certainly if you believe intermeddling of the same is happening, I do know that court orders could be made to remove administrators/executors from wills/probate if acting improperly, that is, not in the interest of the estate nor beneficiaries; and for any hidden info to be presented.

 

As every case is different and Probate law is very complicated, I would speak either to C.A.B. or a Probate specialist who can advise you 100% accurately in respect of your position and your next movements.

 

Keep posting your progress and good luck

 

Dons2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again... and OMIGOD!!!!!!!

 

I cannot*** CANNOT*** believe what you have been subjected to.

 

That is disgusting. The council tax issue we dicussed in the 'Council Tax levied even when you're dead' thread - regarding the death cert and the strong letter via recorded delivery - do the same for all the utilities that are still mailing your blessed mum. Keep copies, recorded delivery POD's, everything.. If this should go to court this will form your evidence (or part of it!)

 

As for the solicitor - you write to her and tell her you wish to be kept informed of all the progress being made regarding mum's estate. If she is rude to you again, you tell her you will make a formal complaint about her to the Law Society, and recap the situation you described earlier when she said she hoped you weren't asking for money. That is completely unprofessional and she has made herself look awful.

 

Please please get advice regarding the execs and that they made decisions about assets in the estate before the Probate was granted - if they were within their rights then at least you know for sure. Find out if you have any legal right to apply for their removal as execs of the estate - again, if you don't have the right to do this at least you know for sure. I am sure that the fact they haven't even contacted the utility companies and the local council may hold some sway. They have had since October to do this and this could go against them.

 

The execs have a duty under law to liquidate all assets and pay all debts and they ALSO have a personal responsibilty for tax and a personal responsibility to beneficiaries.

If you wish to contest an executor with a view to having them removed and wish to be an executor yourself, I do believe that this is possible - as far as I am aware, the only person who cannot be an exec is a witness to a will. If you wanted to go down this route you would have to get some sound advice re this. Bear in mind that an exec can reclaim nearly all the costs of proving and executing a will so this shouldn't be too much of a burden. It may be the best way forward so that you know everything is taken care of properly...

 

I am not trying to put words in your mouth, nor ideas in your head but these are points to consider very carefully inmaking sure your mum's wishes are met.

 

Dons2008 x

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Theywontwin

 

Stick at it and grit your teeth - these things are never easy I know but from what I can see (and I'm not an expert!) you seem to have a good case. With the right advice and guidance, things will even out for you I promise...!!:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...