Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NHS National Database - The Big Opt Out Campaign


Michael Browne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5963 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The NHS Confidentiality campaign was set up to protect patient confidentiality and to provide a focus for patient-led opposition the government’s NHS Care Records System. This system is designed to be a huge national database of patient medical records and personal information (sometimes referred to as the NHS ’spine’) with no opt-out mechanism for patients at all. It is being rolled out during 2007, and is objectionable for many of the same reasons as the government’s proposed ID database.

 

 

YOUR PRIVACY

Your medical confidentiality is at risk from this new database, as over a million NHS employees and central government bureaucrats will have access to not only your medical records but also your demographic details—name, address, NHS Number, GP details, phone number (even if it’s ex-directory) and mobile number.

 

There is no opt out whatsoever for your demographic details. You can only have them hidden in special circumstances if the police or social services request it—if, for example, you are a celebrity or on a witness protection scheme. Many public and private sector workers will otherwise have access to your address and phone number, from social workers to pharmacists.

 

You will eventually be allowed to ‘lock down’ some of your medical details (though the security mechanisms haven’t been built yet). But although you can keep some of your medical details confidential from some of the doctors involved in your care, they can override this if they think it’s necessary, and there is no way for you to keep your information confidential from civil servants. You will no longer be able to attend any Sexual Health or GUM (Genito-Urinary Medicine) Clinic anonymously as all these details will also be held on this national database, alongside your medical records. For the first time everyone’s most up-to-date and confidential details are to be held on one massive database.

 

Click herefor more information, here for the latest news, and here to find out what you can do about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MB

 

I asked the practice manager at GPs about this last year.

 

Her reply to me was that although it would be rolled out in 2008, every patient would receive a letter that would give them the opportunity to opt out of the system.

 

Unless things have changed in the mean time, i for one do not want all and sundry accessing my medical records and will be protesting to anyone who will listen.

 

Nother visit to MP methinks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any update on this?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, should we contact our own surery to get a copy of their opt-out forms?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Devil's Advocate time - I'm sure I'm in the minority on this, but the reassurance I get from knowing that if I was in a car crash somewhere else in the country the A&E staff could access my medical information far outweighs any worry I feel about the security of my medical records!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Devil's Advocate time - I'm sure I'm in the minority on this, but the reassurance I get from knowing that if I was in a car crash somewhere else in the country the A&E staff could access my medical information far outweighs any worry I feel about the security of my medical records!

 

And if that were it's sole function, I might be inclined to agree. But the access is far too wide. And why would A&E need my phone numbers etc.

 

After the recent examples of data loss by government and its agencies, I am not inclined to give them anything more than the bare minimum that I am legally obliged to give.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And if that were it's sole function, I might be inclined to agree. But the access is far too wide. And why would A&E need my phone numbers etc.

 

After the recent examples of data loss by government and its agencies, I am not inclined to give them anything more than the bare minimum that I am legally obliged to give.

 

Again, not the popular opinion, I know, but I'd much prefer they had too much information than too little! Then again, any identity thief would be sorely disappointed if they tried to nick my ID, my credit rating's awful, I have no assets and can't drive, and I'm a poor student, so they wouldn't get too far! Maybe if I had more to lose I'd think differently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Called in at my GP surgery last night, the receptionist didnt have the faintest idea what i was talking about in relation to the database.

 

She did say i was the second person this week to ask about it and to her knowledge there were no plans at present to upload anyones files from that surgery.

 

If this programme is supposed to be rolled out this year,with or without our consent, which is the best way of approaching the surgery? With a new GP having taken over i dont know if he has a stance on the subject yet.

The receptionist did say that if i bring in any forms ive downloaded it would go on my file and she would be interested in having a look.

 

Fills you with confidence doesnt it!

 

In principle i understand why it would make life easier to have all your info within easy reach, my fear is that we have no idea who will really have access to our files, no guarantee it will be secure and current levels of incompetance and mis-information make it difficult to have any real faith in the system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...