Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lies or default which would you fight first ?


gordonsanderson
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6005 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:) Hi Everybody,

I've sent HFC bank a letter requesting my legal agreement,but i also have lots of evidence to show that HFC have lied to the ombudsman about my account, i was also defaulted in 2005 but didnt find out until i applied for credit in 2007, does anybody have a direction in which to persue first ie the lies or the default.

Many Thanks:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

when you say Legal agreement, i assume that you mean the Credit agreement?

 

now is the account open? or is it closed

 

to be honest, if you could provide a little more background detail as to whats happened that would be helpful

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) Hello Again,

I'm starting off with Rules, Rights and justice An introduction and i am really looking forward to it.

The letter asks, that , i have requested exact copies of the original loan documentation,with, total loan amount interest and monthly repayments including full APR breakdown, together with total and exact copies of the original PPI, including total interest and monthly repayments including full APR, this is a shortened version but you get the point, i have explained to them exactly what i want simply and easy for them to understand, i have also explained the time scale among other aspects.

 

regards:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello

 

ah yes W100, youll enjoy that course as its a gentle start to a law degree, i did that one a while ago now but its a good start. just dont expect too much from it as its not a black letter law course as some expect

 

right then onto the more important matters

 

now then, if the account is closed, you cannot use the provisions of the CCA 1974 to demand a copy of your credit agreement and you would have to use a SAR

 

so i guess my first question is, is the account now closed??

 

if its not closed then we can use a CCA request to demand the info.

 

if the account is closed then we need to use a SAR .

 

the ppi if its been mis sold can be reclaimed so not to worry there and this really is a separate issues IMHO at this stage.

 

if you can confirm the account status that would be good.

 

also with the letter did you include any money? or a cheque as payment for the request . im just trying to establish what you have done so far so i can get a full picture

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

Yes the account is still open but in default, i am paying half the cotractual amount £152.00 per month. There have been many issues regarding my monthly payments. In March 2005 i seperated from my fiance though be it briefly, i approached HFC bank informed them that i could not make full monthly payments, though i could make half the contractual repayment "UNTIL" my circumstance changed. I was advised to make a total of three more payments at half the contractual amount, then i would qualify for a loan restructure, which, would have no affet on my credit file. I then did what i was advised, though instead of making three payments i made four. After these payments had been made, i recieved no communication at all, so contacted the bank in august, said that no payment would be made until my request had been honouredIthen continued with septembers payment (half the contractual amount) and set up a direct debit, when the payment was taken from my bank it was for the full contractual amount of £301.12, so of course it was later reffered back to HFC from which the defaulted my account. When i sent all the information to the ombudsman, HFC lied to them and said that no payments were made OCT/NOV 2005, and also that none were made OCT 2005-JAN 2005.According to my bank statements december's payment was not made due to the fact that i changed my payment date in OCT 2005, so of course HFC decided to take the payment on the new date and did also on the old payment date, which they claim to be in arrears, and with regards to OCT 2005-JAN 2006, their own statement of my account shows that payments were made. that and many other lies and tricks they have tried.

 

Reards Gordon:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok heres what to do then

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

use the link and use letter N

 

send it to the company and include a one pound postal order,

 

do not sign the letter instead print your name

 

send it recorded delivery at the minimum

 

they will have 12 working days to supply you the requested info from the point where they receive the letter,if they fail to comply then they are in default and not entitled to enforce the agreement while the default continues which means you are legally entitled to withold payment until they send hte requested info.

 

you must follow the statutory procedure though to request the copy of your credit agreement and must send a one pound postal order to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Again,

Yes, that looks simple but more effective , and i can understand the reason for not giving my signature, i might get a response after new year hopefully, then which direction, i need to get the person before i get the loan sorted surely?

 

Regards

Gordon:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

righty then,

 

i would suggest that you have a chat with your local trading standards with regards the issue of the person and see what they advise,

 

with regards to the Loan,

 

NO CCA = NO ENFORCABLE DEBT and there is nowt they can do to change that, well unless they produce a valid, properly executed credit agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Problem Gordon

 

lets see what they send first,

 

if they ignore the request, after the 12 working days, you can consider stopping payments and you are totally within your rights to do so. i bet you will get their attention then. (you must wait til the 12 working days expire after receipt of the request first)

 

one way or another we can get this sorted

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a great deal, i'll keep you informed, it's gonna get interesting coz it's already been a year since i started, and i aint goin home with anything less than what i want.

Regards:)

 

 

Hi,

 

So what is it you want exactly? I am one of the few that feels inaccurate accounting can and should be dealt with via the Courts and full refunds given under the provisions of the CCA ammendments of 2006 section 140. But hey that is a whole other book...Banks should not be able to use the Law when it suits then lie or evade the truth when questioned...

 

Have a read of my Woolwich thread. It is not like yours, but you may be able to get the drift and see that in the end it may well be worth the fight...Mine went for nine months.

 

Good luck,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...