Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wages Overpayment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6024 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I left my old job in July 2007 to take up a new job.

 

I then received a letter from my old employer, stating that during an audit it had appeared I had been overpaid by them over 3 years for an amount of £12,000. I wrote back and asked for a breakdown of how this was calculated, which they provided and it appears i was. I never noticed this as was always working overtime and wages were never the same and I stupidly always assumed that I had been paid the correct amounts!

 

I have agreed that I should pay the money back, but their solicitor has said that I have to pay this all in one lump sum by the end of January or they will take me to court and seek a Bankcruptcy order to get this money back.

 

Can they do this? As they paid the money over 3 years, can they just request it back in one go?

 

Any help on this would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Short answer is no.

 

Whilst it is their mistake, you do have to repay it. You can make a reasonable offer to repay by instalments. If it took them 36 months of overpayemnet to reach this position, then I would argue that it is perfectly reasonable to repay this by 36 monthly repayments (and before you ask, they should not be entitled to interest).

 

Also, you will need to look very carefully at whether this is a nett overpayment or a gross overpayment that they are claiming. They should only reclaim the nett amount (ie what went into your bank account). They need to take up the overpayment of tax and NI with HMRC (which will be interesting for the initial 2 years, as they will have signed declarations as to these).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the above - you have paid tax and Ni on these monies - so you need time to check your position carefully.

 

I think requesting immediate re-payment is unreasonable as part of the fault lies with them

 

A trip to CAB might be in order.

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the others have said, you absolutely need to find out the figure minus the taxc and NI. I am surprised their solicitors are demanding the money in a lump sum by end January - seems like they are trying it on if you ask me.

 

Given that the overpayment was your employer's mistake and paid over three years (I find it hard to believe no-one spotted it before now!!), you should not be expected to repay it over less than 3 years (if at all).

 

I would recommend making an appointment with a solicitor in your area who offers a free initial consultation - you need to get the exact legal position on this.

 

Please let us know the advice you receive.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the solicitors should realise is that if they took you to court, I wouldn't think that any judge in the country would try to enforce a lump sum repayment.

In fact, if you were to do an income and expenditure sheet, you might even be given a much longer period to pay it back.

 

Regards, Rooster.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have agreed that I should pay the money back, but their solicitor has said that I have to pay this all in one lump sum by the end of January or they will take me to court and seek a Bankcruptcy order to get this money back.

 

Admitting that was probably a mistake on your part, but its done now. Was this in writing?

 

How exactly has the mistake been done? I mean, as you stated, you worked overtime, and simply thought that the amounts were the correct overtime premiums.

 

I would suggest you have no further correspondence with them, and see if they go ahead and take you to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...