Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

The Co-op - a different bank charge issue...


davjoh
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6034 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here's a letter I just typed up to the bank. Pretty self explanatory. Only posting it up because it shows how shoddy even banks can be at drawing up contracts without holes (like we didn't already know that...)

On XXXXX you attempted to take a bill payment instruction from my above referenced account to pay XXXXXX, in the amount of XXXXXX. This transaction was reversed on the basis that I had insufficient funds in my current account at that time for the payment to be made. As a result of which, you levied a fee against me of £35.00 on the same date, and notified me of the same by letter.

It is my position that you have no contractual entitlement to charge this amount. The schedule of account charges for the current account provides the following:

“Unpaid items – this charge may be applied if cheques, standing orders or direct debits cannot be paid due to a lack of funds or where you used a cheque guarantee facility or Visa debit card to create or extend an existing overdraft.”

The payment that was attempted and subsequently reversed was made by bill payment using internet banking. The schedule of charges does not provide for a fee to be levied if a bill payment cannot be paid due to lack of funds.

You cannot state that a bill payment is a form of standing order. The bank, in the help pages of the internet banking service, defines a standing order as:

“a ‘standing order’ is a regular payment which debits your account in specified amounts.”

The help pages define a bill payment as:

“this is a facility that allows you to make one off payments for your household bills or credit card payments etc.”

It is clear that these two payment types are completely separate by definition and, in the absence of a clause to the contrary, reference to the first in the schedule of charges cannot be taken as a reference to the second. You have therefore, without lawful or contractual authority, debited against my account a fee to which you are not entitled. This amounts to breach of contract, and may amount to an offence of fraud by abuse of position, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

What I require you to do now

I expect you to make:

1. A full and immediate refund of the sum debited from my account

2. A full written apology and an undertaking not to breach the contract again

3. A reasonable offer of compensation for breaching the contract

If you do not, it may be necessary for me to either rescind the contract, in which case I would seek the additional costs of finding and establishing a new account, payment to reflect the damage that doing so would do to my creditworthiness, and any other reasonable costs, expenses and damages (including punitive damages); or to take you to court for the breach; or both.

I look forward to your written response no later than XXXXXX. If you do not respond within this time I will progress this matter as summarised without further notice to you.

I can't wait to see what they say to this. I'm hoping and pleading I get an "the FSA says we don't have to respond to bank charges disputes letter" - the fun I could have responding to that!

(apologies - its 3am and I'm hyper on the pepsi. wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee)

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was an online payment, ie you made it with your online banking facility then it should not have been made due to insufficient money being in the account. Minor point of error: the company would make a request for payment if it was a direct debit not the bank. Can you clarify that the payment was an ONLINE transaction and that the charge was for that and not the first payment of a direct debit because I am aware of no banks that will charge you if you initiate an online payment through the account when the money is in the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Gertie100

So whilst online paying the bill, was there enough money in the account?

 

Internal banking bill payment - do you mean an arrangement you set up via internet banking to pay a certain amount each month to the same supplier? Eg. Electric, gas, credit card?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gertie,

 

I also use this "online bill paying service" with my bank (A&L). Whilst it appears, from the customer-interface, like a completely seperate process to direct debits and standing orders I believe that the banks process these payments in exactly the same manner as a standing order. FYI the payment is an "ad-hoc" payments system, users can deposit variable numbers and values at dates of their choosing. These are completely different to both Standing orders and direct debits in their behaviour as transactions.

 

Thus the payment isn't taken at the immediate moment you press the magic button, but is (I am speculating) added to a batch job by the bank, and processed later in the day (or on the day the payment was scheduled for). Consequentially the funds do not necessarily have to be in the account at the time the payment is arranged. Further evidence is available because you can select the date the payment is made, thus indicating that these jobs are simply "added to the queue".

 

This is probably why the bank believe that they are entitled to levy the charge, however I completely agree with davejoh, that this payment is offered as a seperate service, aside from Direct Debits and Standing Orders. The bank should have therefore been more thorough in drafting their terms and conditions, to ensure that these items are covered. based on the information provided it certainly seems they are not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Gertie100

Ahhh right - when I use this service with my bank it shows the money being taken from account straight away - I guess this was the point I was making!

Whilst the principle of the complaint is easy to agree with I feel the banks response may be along the lines of, why did you arrange to pay this bill for a time when you didn't have any money in the account?

 

Don't all shout at me - I'm not saying that I think the charge is correct etc etc. just speculating...:D

 

Davjoh - keep us up to date please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I inputted the incorrect amount - one too many zeros. I could try and ask them politely, but feel I'd be wasting my time. Besides, getting them over a barrell seems like fun...

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can change the amount paid if you made a mistook on the co-op site.

just select the same payee again from the list, if the payment has not been processed [normally 2 days] you can change it.

 

if it wont allow that phone the usual banking number [212212 etc]

and get themn to do it, there is no charge.

 

dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...