Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite usual for couriers to swap parcel contents, though it could have been done by someone at the 1st address before it got to where it should have .... ebay. just to clarify as you seem to be not understanding/reading some posts correctly.   you should always ignore a dca totally unless you ever get a letter of claim in the post. you never ever ring a DCA.. they LIE. no!! no!! they dont own the debt, their txt says our client ebay. only the OWNER of a debt can take you to court. and ebay dont do court. i find it quite amazing that you have numerous threads about ebay/paypal regarding issues since you joined in 2011 but have never read any of the advice previously given. dx    
    • so where are the one with this HMTL link? and when were they sent.? pdf's merged and properly named. dx  
    • Hi Just had a wee look at your PDF and nothing really to add. Now as for the Court Fees if these are in there Claim then that is for the Judge to decide whether they accept the recovery of Court Fees in the Claim. If recovery of Court Fees are not in the Claim and they try to recover these via your deposit then you dispute this with the Tenancy deposit scheme your deposit is protected in and point out these costs should have been in there Court Claim which they failed to do and is there error.  
    • The postcode is an important point. You cannot be in two postcodes at the same time and the contract only covers the F area and not the E area where Met placed your car. See there is some   advantages in with idiots.🙂 The other fact about the electric spaces is that as you are not allowed to park there, the sign is prohibitory so cannot  offer a contract anyway. and another biggie in your favour is you were not the driver and the PCN does not comply with PoFA. I had another look yesterday at the PCN and there is another error since it does not say that the driver is responsible to pay the charge during the first 28 days. Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][b] (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; so that is another nail in their coffin and it s something I would include in  your WS since that is one that every Judge would accept as a failure to comply. As far as their WS is concerned some of them leave it to the last minute to prevent Defendants being able to counteract their claims. However if they leave it too late [ie after the stipulated time] you can email yours to the Court on the last day and complain at the bottom of your WS that you have not received it and therefore you are asking the Court not to accept their WS. In your case it isn't that important since you have a virtual walkover in Court. I would be surprised if they don't concede beforehand. It is a lost cause for them. Not that I would advocate parking in their electric bay in future with a petrol driven car again.🙂
    • I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC Passed overdraft to DCA


alf2000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have had a student overdraft with HSBC for 8 years and have never been able to clear it. I have wrote to them a number of times over recent years explaining my circumstances and explaining that I am having trouble clearing it as I can only afford a repayment level that clears the interest that they have been putting on it.

 

Every year they write to me to demand the full overdraft to be repaid in full within 7 days. I always write back and explain that I can not do this and tell them that I can put £x per month into the account.

 

In August I was away from my home for 3 weeks and they wrote to me in that period to demand it all back within 7 days, obviously I missed that deadline as I did not know about their letter.

 

However as soon as I got back I called them, but they would not speak to me on the phone as I do not have telephone banking.

 

I then called into the local branch and explained my circumstances, they understood and tried to sort it out but said that they could not do anything now as it showed that I had not responded to the final demand so my account was in default. so I would have to call them and have telephone banking agree a managed loan.

 

I tried to call again and asked them to put a note on the system, and I wanted a copy of the call recording sending to me under the Data protection act - a manger finally agreed to this. They also said they would send out a new security pack to allow me to speak to them on the phone.

 

7 days went by and I sent a letter to HSBC to explain everything, and ask them for a couple of weeks without them posting bad feedback to credit ref etc.

 

A few days later I got a letter from a DCA saying that they had taken over the debt.

 

A few days later I got a letter from HSBC saying that they decided to pass it to a DCA on the same date that I sent them my letter so they could not respond to my request or agree a repayment plan.

 

I really don't want to deal with a DCA and have explained to the DCA that there is a dispute and that HSBC should not have sent the account over to them. (The DCA agreed to hold off for 4 weeks)

 

I then wrote to HSBC again and explained to them that I was trying to agree a repayment plan with them, but they claim I had made no contact so they sold the debt and it is too late now and they will not deal with me.

I have continued to make online payments directly to HSBC to reduce my overdraft, but the DCA have wrote to me to tell me that HSBC have passed the payments on to them.

HSBC will not entertain a repayment plan or a full and final settlement.

 

I have opened up a case with the financial ombudsman as I don't believe that HSBC should have passed the debt over based on 1 letter whilst I was away from home and on the grounds that I was frantically trying to get this resolved with them in the 10 day period between me getting the letter and them passing it over to the DCA.

 

Has anyone got any advise on what I should do now and where I stand?

Do I just have to deal with the DCA now? or can I wait for the verdict of the financial ombudsman?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont talk to these people on the phone, except to insist all communications are in writing, refuse to answer and security questions.

 

You need to make them prove that they have a legal right to claim the debt, Did you receive a letter from HSBC telling you they were transferring the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they told me that they had now transfered it to the DCA in their response to my letter asking them to agree a repayment plan and explaining what has been going on.

 

They also warned that it could go to a DCA etc in the final demand

Link to post
Share on other sites

What am I best doing now?

 

Trying to get it passed back to HSBC as they have an information breakdown and are too gun ho to pass this over to the DCA whilst I am trying to agree a repayment plan with HSBC?

 

Should I write another letter of compaint to HSBC (I am not satisfied with their response) ?

 

Ignore the DCA and wait to see if the ombudsman rules against HSBC?

 

Ask HSBC for a signed copy of my overdraft agreement?

 

Ask the DCA for a signed copy of my overdraft agreement?

 

Run and hide :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone got any advise, the DCA have not contacted me since I told them that HSBC should not have sent it over. They said they wanted a copy of the letters and gave me 4 weeks to send them in.

(The letters they want were to prove that there was a dispute before they sent it over the the DCA)

 

Its been more than 5 weeks now!

 

Should I just sit back and wait and see what happens? or are they suddenly going to hit me with you missed the 7 day deadline, now its out of our hands its up to the courts??? Help? I feel like I am a sitting duck, sat here waiting for these guys to pull the trigger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

They never replied to my CCA, they sent the £1 postal order back and said we do not charge.

 

A few month later they said the hold we put on your account has ended pay up now.

 

I sent them a letter back saying they were in default of the CCA.

 

Nothing for a few months ...

 

And then they sent another letter saying the hold on the A/C had ended.

 

So I sent one back saying they were in default and going against OFT regs etc.

 

They have now sent a personal one back basically saying I got the templates of the internet and the they did not have to provide a CCA in any form. They also said that because I complained to HSBC about passing the account over to Metro that it was proof that the debt exisited.

 

Any advise on what I should do now?

 

I will post a copy of the letter on here when I get chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there penalty charges on the account and if so do you have any idea what percentage they would be of the account?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked about this time last year and there was not any then, I still don't think there is any charges, just interest.

 

I could do another SAR to see if any have been put on, but if so I suspect it would be less than 10% if any.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Alf if they cant provide a true copy of the credit agreement they are stuffed and as they have said they cant or wont provide this they can take this no further.

 

Just for your information Metropolitan Collections are a wholey owned subsidiary of HSBC and work for no one else.... in other words they are just HSBC's collections department who use a different letter head to fool everyone :rolleyes: they even have the same data controller as HSBC

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this one any good to you, Alf?

 

Formal Complaint

Letter before Action

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

With reference to my previous letters, I wish to draw you attention to your company's lack of compliance with my legal request.

 

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. A copy of which is enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

You have failed to comply with request, and as such the account entered default on **DATE**.

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.

 

As you may not be aware , failure to comply with this request within 12 working days renders the alleged debt UNENFORCEABLE in law. Furthermore, if this non-compliance continues for a further month then a summary, criminal offence is committed.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a compliant credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* may not pass the account to a third party.

* may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that your continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40, Protection from harassment Act 1997 section 3 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you would prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I await your rapid response.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

[

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a nice strong letter Johnny.

 

The only problem is they are saying that they are except from this due to section V current accounts/overdrafts, and therefore are saying that I got my templates from here and got it wrong as it does not apply therefore they had nothign to respond to, i.e they did not have to respond to my CCA but do say they returned my £1 as a result of this.

 

I know this is a grey area, but I would have thought that they would have had to send something out even if they do not need a signed CCA.

 

What are your thoughts on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry alf, I misread this - I was under the impression that it was a CCA you were after............. :confused:

 

However , if your current account is in dispute, they shouldn't pass it to a DCA . Are you claiming that your current account balance is incorrect because of unlawful bank charges?

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there are any charges, my dispute was that they transfered it to Metro whilst I was trying to agree with them how to resolve their demand.

 

I was under the impression that they still had to respond to a CCA even if it was just to send a letter with the T&C's blance etc but it did not need to be signed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alf, just found your thread and thought I'd add my two pennies worth. What Metropolitan have said is partially correct in that overdrafts are exempt from Part V of the act (Form and Content of Agreements, duty to supply copies etc) by virtue of the OFT Section 74 Determination. However, in order to benefit from this exemption, the banks have to have complied with the requirements of the OFT determination, of which the following is an extract:

 

2. This Determination is made subject to the following conditions:-

(a) that the creditor shall have informed my Office in writing of his general intention to enter into agreements to which the Determination will apply;

(b) that where there is an agreement between a creditor and a debtor for the granting of credit in the form of an advance on a current account, the debtor shall be informed at the time or before the agreement is concluded:

- of the credit limit, if any,

- of the annual rate of interest and the charges applicable from the time the agreement is concluded and the conditions under which these may be amended,

of the procedure for terminating the agreement;

and this information shall be confirmed in writing.

© that where a debtor overdraws his current account with the tacit agreement of the creditor and that account remains overdrawn for more than 3 months, the creditor must inform the debtor in writing not later than 7 days after the end of that 3 month period of the annual rate of interest and charges applicable.

 

It might be worth going through all correspondence etc (or S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) them to make sure you have everything) to see if they have complied with the above requirements. If not, then the overdraft agreement will be subject to the requirements of the CCA and specifically Part V.

 

I'm going through a similar situation as you appear to be, my thread is here if you want to take a look, there's also some very good advice on there from fellow CAGers which could be relevant to your situation also.

 

Good luck mate

 

Chris

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great Chris, just been looking over your thread.

 

I will fire off a S.A.R, I take it I need to add to the SAR template that I am requesting copies of all letters that they hold on file rather than bank statements etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you guys think this is okay to use as the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) for the purpose of establishing if they have complied with OFT section 74 Determination?

 

[your address]

 

 

 

[their address]

 

 

[DATE]

 

 

 

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx

 

Please supply me with a complete copy of all correspondence, notices, notes, transcripts, or any other documentation relating to my banking history with your organisation.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

[signature]

 

 

[name]

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's right alf2000, you want all correspondence that has passed between you to determine whether they have complied with the conditions outlined above by Chris. It may be ,for example that they have failed to notify you of Interest charges and rates applicable........?

 

Sorry alf - you beat me by a whisker...... LOL! That SAR looks OK to me - short sharp and to the point - don't forget to send it 'Recorded Delivery'

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think I should also send a letter to HSBC pushing my complaint to the FOS? or is it true what Metro say in their letter that this acknowledges the agrement?

 

The advantage to doing so will be that Metro can not chase while I am waiting for my SAR etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Changed it to add the agreements bit

 

Please supply me with a complete copy of all correspondence, notices, notes, transcripts, specifically any contracts or agreements that you claim to exist between us, and any other documentation relating to my banking history with your organisation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...