Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ordered to pay forthwith


Recommended Posts

i set up a courier business as a sole trader and had a fuel account with a local garage. i accrued 3000 worth of debt and due to bad payers i haven't been able to clear. solicitors wanted 500 a month min and it ended up with a summons. i offered 50 a month although i could realistically afford more. sent form back to solicitor and yesterfay received a letter from court saying "in front of a proper officer of the court you are ordered to pay 4000 forthwith". why have they not took my finanial circumstances into consideration and what should i do next?

any help much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stunner.

 

I'm wanting to be absolutely clear about what you are saying.

 

Has this gone to court? And you did not go to defend it?

 

What did you put on the form to the solicitor? What happened then?

 

Sorry for all the questions, but until we're sure of what you're saying it's hard to help.

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here goes

 

The solicitors tried to get full payment and i offered 500/month even though i couldn't have afforded it. They declined threatening legal action.

 

I said go to court - I have had ccj's in the past and thought i will be able to offer a realistic offer - I was wrong!

 

THe summons came through and i filled in the admission form and sent it to the solicitors offering 50/month

 

I heard nothing for a month and on saturday a letter came from the court

 

"in front of a proper officer of the court you are ordered to pay the full balance forthwith"

 

I never received notification of any hearing and can't understand why it is such a difference. If they had said 150-200 a month i could have lived with that

 

Why haven't they took my financial situation into consideration?

 

What do i do next?

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Fallenangel

Hi we were issued with a forthwith judgement last year on a debt of £2300. My hubby took legal advice on the day the letter informing us of the judgement arrived, and that was to get a form N245 in to the court ASAP. We originally offered £50 per month and it was rejected. We sent the N245 back the same day and got a judgement in our favour to pay the £50. Although it cost us £35 to submit the N245, in some circumstances its free. You could alternatively, ask for a redetermination of the judgement, but I only have experience of the judgement we dealt with last year.

 

FA x

Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the court order?

 

You can request a redetermination within 14 days, if you request it in writing there is no cost.

 

After 14 days then a variation application via the n245 as aforementioned is the way to go.

 

Are you in rented or mortgaged accomodation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for answers

 

I am in rented accomodation

 

Still got 6/7 days to request redetermination

 

I sent to solicitors on letter from court it says claimant rejected offer

 

Not surprised they wanted all in one go

 

I am just surprised as i thought a court always favoured the defendent and passed judgement based on income

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court would not have had any indication that you wanted instalments since the creditor would not have let them know. if you get your re-determination request off to the court ASAP you should hopefully get reasonable instalments sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks that would explain why they rejected my offer. Are the solicitors not obloged to inform court of offer though?

 

what they are supposed to do and what they actually do are two seperate entities.

 

You need to be real quick with your re-determination request, once the 14 days are up the judgment would be in default and they could choose to enforce it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure.

 

You letter has to include the following

 

  • The fact that you would like a re-determination of the rate of payment
  • The reason as to why you want to
  • Whether you would like a hearing (you really do!)
  • Information on the parties, the court reference number and your full name
  • attached evidence such as a budget sheet etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Fallenangel

Date,,,,,,,,

 

 

The Court Manager

 

CLAIM NUMBER:

 

To the Court Manager:

 

REDETERMINATION UNDER RULE 14.13CPR

 

I apply for this matter to be reconsidered (redetermination under Rule 14.13 of of the Civil Procedures Rules) Under rule 14.13 there is no court fee to make this application.

 

I am unable to pay the full Judgment forthwith/instalment as ordered on (insert date) and submit that this has been set an unrealistic amount.

 

I request the Court reconsiders the Judgment. To assist i enclose an up to date financial statement and list of other unsecured debts.

 

As you can see my budget shows I have £..... surplus / £.... defecit after essential living costs and also have (insert number of creditors in total). Given my circumstances and considering my finances as a whole I am able to offer £.... monthly instalments and request the Court set the Judgment

at this amount.

 

Under rule 14.13 of the CPR it is clear that because the Judgment was granted without a hearing I am entitled to have this redetermination and if necessary transferred to my local County Court. My application is also compliant with the time limit as it falls within the 14 days from the original order.

 

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Name

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...