Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Clydesdale Financial Services "WON"


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5721 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

For avoidance of doubt (;)) what they paid was all the charges they made for letters telling my son he was behind with payments, one or two late payment charges, interest and court fees.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have told Clydesdale to go forth and multiply as their charges are more than the o/s balance. Haven't heard anything for a month or so - perhaps they finally got the message.

 

When I was up the creek without a wooden thing Clydesdale were the only creditor who refused to freeze interest - they reduced it but would not freeze it. I have boatloads (pardon the pun) of letters telling me that their company policy is blah blah - they seem to think they are above everyone else for some unknown reason:confused:

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Another small victory - Barclays keep ringing me for my son even though I told them he doesn't live here. One 'senir staff member' told me they intended to carry on ringing me as it was the only number they had for him. So I sent the following letter to their legal department:

Barclays Legal & Compliance

Level 29

One Churchill Place

London

E14 5HP

 

Dear Sirs

 

Re: Account xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Barclays Partner Finance)

 

The above account belongs to son4064 who used to reside at the above address but no longer does so.

 

Barclays persistently phone son on my telephone number (xxxx xxxxxxx) concerning collection on this account even though I have told Barclays on a number of occasions that son is no longer at this address and requested that no more calls are made to my telephone number.

 

I received such a call today and again repeated my request that this number should not be called, as son no longer lives here. The person I spoke to claimed to be a senior member of staff and, on that basis, refused to let me speak to a supervisor. He also said that it was his intention to carry on calling this number as it was the only number Barclays had. It is clear that Barclays’ policy is to harass the nearest person they can get to if they are unable to communicate with a client.

 

I would like to point out that this behaviour constitutes harassment under ss1&2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 –

 

1 Prohibition of harassment

(1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct—

(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and

(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

(2) For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other…

 

2 Offence of harassment

(1) A person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1 is guilty of an offence.

(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both...

 

Further, this behaviour is also an offence under s127(2)© of the Communications 2003 –

 

127 Improper use of public electronic communications network

 

(2) A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—

© persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.

(3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both...

 

I have written to you so that you can impress the seriousness of their actions on the department concerned, since the person who phoned me was obviously ignorant in this respect.

 

If I receive any further calls relating to this matter, I will give the facts to the local police, naming the Barclays employees involved and any senior managers I deem to be responsible. I also reserve the right to civil remedy under s3 of the Protection from Harassment Act and also enforcement action under s4 of that Act and s129 of the Communications Act via OFCOM.

 

Please do not phone concerning this matter. If you need to communicate with me, write to the above address. The only correspondence I am prepared to entertain is a confirmation that Barclays are going to cease this behaviour. Any other correspondence will also be deemed to constitute part of the same campaign of harassment.

 

Yours sincerely

 

steven4064

Today I got a very polite phone call telling me they had removed my number from thesystem :)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recieved a letter confirming the removal of my number from their system and the usual bumph about resolving complaints internally and about the FOS. OK by me, but it's the police not the FOS if the calls restart.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm currently going through a Claim with Clydesdale aka Barclays partner finance. I wrote to ask for my total charges back (which amount to over £1000) and recieved a response today stating the £22.50 a time for late payment is fair and justified. I really want to reclaim this money back, and have received several phonecalls to my home which after reading this post could be deemed as harrassment.

Victoria :)

 

Vixsta14 vs Barclays bank: Won paid out £900 :lol:

Vixsta14 vs Clydesdale financial (Barclays Partner: Still ongoing :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clydesdale removed my phone number from their system after I sent them the telephone harassment letter.

 

I find their attitude to the £22.50 charges to be rather dictatorial and would have thought that after being reprimanded they would have changed their tune. I got mine back because I owed them about the same so told them to get lost. It took a long time, but I think I have finally got rid of them.

 

Keep on battling. You will get there.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I claimed all the £22.50 charges back on behalf of my son - they are clearly penalties. I went through the whole process, including filing the claim in court and they paid up. They know they haven't got a leg to stand on - there is no way that an automated letter costs £22.50 - 35p, maybe - and it is clearly in response to a breach of contract.

 

I'm wit Goldlady, keep on - you will get it all back.

 

Since our successful claim they have done it again, so watch out for claim 2 coming to a website near you soon:D

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I'm brand new to this forum so please be gentle.

 

I am trying to find a valid phone number for Barclays Partner Finance which I understand is the same company as CFS. All the ones I have tried are unobtainable and even their web site appears down.

 

I bought an Apple computer on 6 months interest free credit just over 5 months ago and I want to pay it off before they add interest.

 

Looking on this forum CFS appears to be, lets say "customer unfriendly" and I don't want to get caught out by them. I have not received any reminder that the 6 months is getting close so that I can pay it off.

 

Any advise gratefully received.

 

Regards, Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave

 

I'm away ATM but I think I have a phone number at home. I will look when I get back unless anyone else can help in the meantime. Isn't there a number on the back of your statements?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks,

I tried the main number again this morning and it worked, guess they had a phone line fault yesterday.

I was able to pay off my account before the 6 months were up, so hopefully that's it finished with.

Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Thread revival :D

 

I have just got a statement from CFS/BPF and have checked out the charges and they are very substantial.

 

I am about to write the letter to them but was wondering did you just use the standard bank charges letter or did you use a specialised one? If so would it be possible to get a copy of it?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

THis is the prelim we sent

Clydesdale Financial Services Ltd

PO Box 3979

Glasgow

G51 1YL

 

 

 

Request for repayment of charges

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT XXXXXXXXX

 

Over the last four months you have added charges to my account purportedly to cover letters sent to me about my account. Each charge is for £22.50 – they are listed in the attached schedule.

 

The letters you sent have all been automatically generated – even the signatures are added by the computer. As such, the total cost to you of sending each letter cannot be more than 35p including stationary and postage.

 

This means that the charges substantially exceed your costs in handling these events and therefore amount to penalty charges, which are contrary to common law and to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Calling them ‘letter charges’ just makes them disguised penalties as defined in the 1999 regulations.

This letter constitutes a formal request for you to repay £112.50 in unlawful charges.

 

This letter is not a complaint and so I do not expect it to be treated as such. Rather, I expect a positive response within 14 days accepting my request in principle. I believe that this is more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and large resources.

 

Yours faithfully,

If there are different sorts of charges, just add them in and nick some paragraphs from the standard bank template to cover them

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...