Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is it voda that's put it back up or is it a debt buyer/dca? that bought the debt.? but no it should not be showing dx  
    • Hello, Im here in regards to a vodafone account from 2015. No payments made on the said vodafone from August 2015 Default Date 12th Dec 2015 . was left sat there untill it dropped off my credit file & thought no more of it . it did eventually drop off my credit file . all done & dusted & had no need to worry about my credit file. as if Vodafone would have written i would have sent them the SB letter.   so fast foward to yesterday 13/06/24 logged in to see my credit file & Bam vodafone appears same amount , same dates only thing that is different is instead of saying default its now on there as Delinquent !!! now my understanding was once a default drops from a credit file it cant be put back on or am i wrong ? so moving forward how would i deal with this ?   any help and advice would be great thank .   BTW i know the default date as back in 2019 i printed my credit report off , on that said report that i fished out today it gives me the default date , status history & Balance history.      
    • US signs ‘Israel style’ 10-year security deal with Ukraine INEWS.CO.UK It comes after G7 nations agreed to free up $50bn from Russia's frozen assets into a revenue stream for Ukraine  
    • Air regulators are investigating new issues with Boeing planes.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Link financial


pebs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6080 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I was telling my friend this afternoon about all the good advice I have had off this forum so she told me a problem she had to see if anyone could advise.

Basically her husband had a really well paid job so about 2 yrs ago he borrowed £30,000 from their mortgage company for home improvements.

He then lost his job last year and fell behind with payments and nearly lost their home but luckily he got another job just before they went to court, although only low wage, so the judge decided they could stay in their home and reduced the mortgage payments.

She said 2 wks ago they got a phone call from link financial saying they had taken over the £30,000 debt so she done an expenditure form and they asked for £60 a month, they said that would leave them with practically nothing over so would they accept £40 but he got quite nasty and said they could be really brutal and force sale of the house to get money back.....she is worried sick as they have children and dont have much money as it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First NEVER speak to these "people" on the phone as they will say anything to secure a payment.

 

When this went to court I assume that a CCJ was granted ?

Link cannot vary the judgement amount without filing a N245 and requesting a change to the payment thorough the court.

 

They can scream and shout as much as they want, but that's how it goes.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about the CCJ, I`ll ask her tomorrow. She did say there was a charge or something on the house over the debt so if they sell the house they have to pay the debt back, but link said they will try to force sale.

What should she do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Relax, Pebs. Link haven't a leg to stand on.

If they want higher payments, they have to go through the court, and if the Judge set payments at the current level, it's not likely that they would be raised, especially if incomings and outgoings are much the same.

 

They're just trying it on.

 

Vultures!

 

:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...