Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
    • no you can email it dont worry about that. take out the index of statement of truth, just not needed
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

DLC and Hillesden Securities.. HELP!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6109 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Okay same company. And Ive got to the bottom of things now and really need some help on where to go from here.

 

Had a credit with 'x' company with a credit limit of say 2500. Ex wife ran up the debt on this card and was unable to pay for it and I was lumbered with it.

Okay. DLC take on the debt and the figure they have including whatever company 'x' has whacked on top is now nearly £1000 above the original credit limit of the card.

At the time and after an original letter from DLC to pay the debt in 2005, this company started taking different figures from my bank (yes I gave them my card details!!!!) I must point out at this point in time I was in a bit of mess going through divorce etc and was essentially just trying to keep my head above water and was making payments above my means at the time as I had been threatened with this that and the other.

In total Ive paid around 800 pounds to these people and payments only stopped late in 2006 after I lost my job.

At this point Ruthbridge get involved trying to claim the debt on behalf of DLC (and the point I first came on here). After my CCA things went quiet and as Ive explained in a previous post, another firm tried ringing me with the usual threats and standard nastiness.

Now it looks like this is now back with Hillesden/DLC.

Id like some help in where I stand now and whether the original request for payment in full of a debt which was 1000 pounds over the original default is legal. According to my figures of what they suggested was the original debt and what Ive paid, its still 200 pounds out (extra).

What am I to do? The debt I would assume would be for the original amount of the card limit (given illegal charges mentioned on here). I dont even think it was at its limit when the default was initiated by company 'x'

Sorry this has been a long post but feel I needed to get the points and the history across before I start doing the complete wrong thing (again!!).

Not only do I feel that I shouldnt be responsible for the debt which I never ran up, the debt itself is far far greater than it was originally and thats having paid £800 already!!!

 

Your help as always really appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi this is not something I have had to deal with I have been lucky in that I have only had to deal with the original creditor. I would say that charges and interest applied to charges have been added to account so you would need to know who had added what to account and get the original agreement. I think you will need to send CCA request and SAR to original creditor, that will allow you to check if other companies have added charges etc. Then proceed from that point.

 

all the best dpick:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit raw but, CCA first to establish if they have the right to collect.

 

Letter N in the templates section

 

It will cost £1

 

If you can't find the template get back.

 

Cheers. Im assuming I should CCA Hillesden despite having heard nothing in writing or telephone from them for over a year???

Link to post
Share on other sites

My card debt has followed the same route as yours mackembulldog. I blew Ruthless out of the water with a stunner of a letter and they backed right off and I have have DLC and Hillesden back on the case again. The CCA they sent me was not valid by anyone's standards and I have just last week sent DLC another stunner of a letter I found on here. I have had calls from their robot

- y o u m u s t c a l l D L C a b o u t r e c e n t l e t t e r -

 

but if they think I am ringing a robot back they can think again. Mind you I wouldn't ring them anyway even if they offered me a case of wine.

 

Did Ruthless ever find your CCA by the way?

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

My card debt has followed the same route as yours mackembulldog. I blew Ruthless out of the water with a stunner of a letter and they backed right off and I have have DLC and Hillesden back on the case again. The CCA they sent me was not valid by anyone's standards and I have just last week sent DLC another stunner of a letter I found on here. I have had calls from their robot

- y o u m u s t c a l l D L C a b o u t r e c e n t l e t t e r -

 

but if they think I am ringing a robot back they can think again. Mind you I wouldn't ring them anyway even if they offered me a case of wine.

 

Did Ruthless ever find your CCA by the way?

 

I dont think Ruthless could find the hole in their arses!! Sorry

I suppose Ill have to wait till I her from Hillesden again and send them the CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am just after some advice if anyone can help ?

A long story cut short: -

I had an account with Barclays Bank which I defaulted on and in turn my account was sold to Hillesden Securities Limited. The account balance at that time was £1,608DR.

In February I claimed back excessive charges from Barclays Bank via the Financial Ombudsman and received a full refund of charges. I was awarded £1260.

I therefore believe my liability to be £348 to Barclays Bank plc (now Hillesden Securities Limited).

I do realise that it may have been in my best interests to of paid the amount refunded from Barclays direct to Hillesden Securities, but, obviously I don’t want to without a fight.

I have disputed the claim Hillesden Securities have against. I have advised Hillesden of my refund and advised them I will settle in full and final without any liability in the sum of £348. (This being the original balance less the refund).

This has not been accepted and I am currently in a position where neither side is moving forward. As far as the paperwork behind the claim for Hillesden Securities is concerned they have a record of £1608 being outstanding. Obviously this includes £1260 worth of default charges etc which Barclays later refunded to me…

Interestingly, I believe Hillesden Securities may of purchased my account for an estimated sum of £350 (The actual amount viewed by me as debt)…

I have requested and paid for a copy agreement which has not been received. An offence has now been committed. I also did not provide permission for the agents of Hilleden (DLC) to view my bank statements – is this a concern due to Data Protection? I believe the terms and conditions of sale will detail if DLC have authority to view my personal statement ?

However, my credit file still reflects £1608 as a bad debt and I am now currently working on having this updated to reflect £348 at the very most.

I do not believe the claim Hillesden Securities has against me to be valid – what is your opinion on this ?? I wonder if the Vendor is liable to Hillesden Securities ?

How do I move forward in aid of having my credit file amended bearing in mind the above ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...