itsamomentintime
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
1,244 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by itsamomentintime
-
submit the claim, mke sure that you have a schedule of chrges and send a copy to the bank and the court, and keep a copy for yourself then just wait
-
can you explain: how much you are claiming and against which bank how far down the process you are have you sent any letters, etc elaborate please
-
wow someone at the BBC likes us little people the second link is nearly as useful as this site!!
-
the makers were on BBC Five Live earlier saying how hard it was to get the banks to explain their charges - not ONE would even give a ballpark figure, what a surprise. consumer power is gonna cost the banks big time
-
any news? does the post office have a duplicate??
-
handbag???? i thought you were a bloke lol!!!!
-
United Utilities - How Dare they
itsamomentintime replied to j4the96's topic in General Consumer Issues
chesham, of course the car was taken without consent i would sue, but i dont know what sort of damages a person could claim -
thanks for the info my understanding is that i can claim interest on each and every charge, and from when it was applied to my account however i am unsure when to claim TO for instance - a charge of £20 was applied to my account on 10/10/2001, so i can claim 8% from then, but how long can i claim the 8% for? from when i filed my claim with MCOL? or until abbey file their defence? when?
-
example--- if you are claiming back, lets say £1000 in charges, stretching back 6 years, do you claim 8% a year on the £1000 for 6 years, even though the charges for the first year may only be £200, then £200 for the second year, etc? i mean - 6 years charges = £1000 - claim 8% a year (£80) then multiply by 6 - total £1480 or do you have to work out what you were charged each year, then claim interest on that amount? for instance: 1st year - £200 - claim 8% (£16) 2nd year - £200 - claim 8% (£16) etc etc for 6 years, then add it all together
-
GLENN thats good advice - i will send a list of charges to them, in the meantime here is their defence: save as is specifically admitted in thi defence, the defendant denies each and every allegation set out in the particulars of claim it is admitted that the claimant has a bank account with the defendant at all times the account has been subject to the applicable terms and conditions which form part of the contract between the claimant and the defendant and to which the claimant agreed when he opened the account. the defendant will refer at trial to the full conditions but for the purposes of this defence will refer to the following extracts: you can apply for an overdraft on your account. if we give you an overdraft we will tell you your limit and the interest rate applicable an unauthorised overdraft occurs if without our agreement you overdraw your ccount or exceed the limit of an overdraft which we have agreed if you have an unauthorised overdraft you will be charged fees as set out in our tarrif of charges or specified to you and these may include fees for transactions we are unable to process due to lack of avilable funds in your account throughout the period that he has had the account, the climant recieved a number of copies of the conditions and of the said tariff of charges as they were amended and updated (though there has been no material amendment to the conditions) any overdraft facility on the account was (and is) subjet to conditions the claimant has overdrawn or exceeded authorised overdraft limits on the account on a number of eperate ocasions, full details of which will be provided on disclosure. therefore by virtue of the conditions already referred to, such overdrawing as unauthorised and in breach of contract and the claimant became liable to pay fees to the defendant in accordance with its tariff of charges applicable at the relevant time. in accordance with the conditions, such fees were debitted to the account. in view of the facts and matters referred to in paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 above, the defendant denies that the amount of £894 or any other amount was unlawfully debitted to the account and the claimants claim for the repayment of tht amount is therefore denied the claimants contention that the said fees are unenforceable and/or are 'penalty charges' is denied. the fees reflect and are proportionate to the defendants admin expenses incurred due to the climants breach of contract and are a genuine pre-estimate of the damage suffered by the defendant furthermore or in the alternative, even if the said fees are not proportionate to the defendants admin expenses incurred (which is denied), the claimant remains liable to pay such fees as may be found to be proportionate and he claimant is not entitled to claim repayment of the full amount of each charge made to the account the defendant denies that the claimant is entitled to interest no admissions are made as to the amounts claimed by the claimant and the claimant is put to strict proof of the same
-
Fraud, will Paypal react in time?????
itsamomentintime replied to metalrat's topic in General Consumer Issues
a word of warning - paypal only cares about one thing; paypal -
how much is it for please
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.