I personally do not have an issue with defendants using credit cards to pay their judgments. The money is owed to a creditor that is out of pocket, so if borrowing is the only way to pay it then so be it. As always, the newspaper article has used the highest APR rates for their headlines. Payment is a byproduct of the HCEO carrying out his duty. It is at the request of defendants that payment is taken by credit card. Remember, payment is only made to prevent the HCEO removing the goods they are sent there to remove.

Spamheed no matter what I say you will never agree.

If you wanted to spend the money and providing you are not libleous I dont think you'd have any problems legally.

pamanar, PT is correct but it would also depend on whether it was the only asset available to the bailiff.

Rob is using an HCEO and you'd be wrong Caro. Most judgments that are enforced by HCEOs are against businesses, usually on behalf of other businesses.

Which questions? There is nothing but hatred, stupidity and abuse in this thread.

WD, you are wrong. Whilst I may not give posters pats on the back and love and hugs, when it comes to aspects of law I have given much advice in an industry I know. Many posters on here have previously given so much incorrect advice regarding various methods of enforcement I felt a need to correct them. I shall start a thread if it makes you happy, but it is not neccessary.

That's a very fair and proportioned response and I shall try to heed your knowledgable advice, difficult as it may be sometimes. HCE

Dear HH, I am not lurking, sometimes I leave my laptop logged in by mistake for days on end. I note that you and spamheed mocked my earlier comments... But surely, somebody in the financial situation that by your own admission you and your family have fallen into, insolvency is something that should be considered, if not ultimately followed through....

Kelcou, you are one of few on this forum, site team now included it would appear, that feels this way. I've said this before, but I started posting on ths site because so much rubbish was being posted about something I know a lot about. Sorry if you feel I've let you down, but you've only got to read through this post to see the idiots you are associating yourself with. Ian Huntley? Fluffy was right. It just goes to show the kind of mentallity you are dealing with on here occasionally.... This isnt aimed at all. TT, PT and even HW are excluded.

:lol: DB :lol:

Yes they do..... (slow hand clap)..... ;-):grin:

This really is one of the most idiotic hate filled posts to grace this forum. The main protaganists (sh, dpb, sm) cannot see past their immature hate filled eyes. I would ask each and every one of you to read through my posts (if you can understand them) and take in the advice and knowledge that I have given this forum, especially in HCE. Brilliantly laughable, all of you. Love to all.....

Bump

You really should look at Insolvency with the problems you're in.

Thank you Spamheed,

Almost always heard where the CCJ was issued, not where the Writ was issued. Rob. it will come down to which Marstons officer covers the defendants area and how good he is. It's well known that their collection rates arent as high as others....

If spamheed has bothered to read the posts then she would have seen that both I and twonames have contributed in a positive manor, detailing to the OP some of his options and guidelines on the law that others have advised incorrctly. Spamheed would be better keeping his edited out of the post full stop and your rant assists nobody either.

Hallowitch, I know you mean well but once again the advice being given to the OP is incorrect.

My knowledge of fees in parking is from many years ago and it would appear others are more uptodate than me on this. I can give guidance (which I already have on earlier posts in this thread) but you'd be better asking someone else on this one...

Thank you Welsh1.

Caggers, please ignore the ramblings of this edit and concentrate on the facts of the matter in this case.

Listen carefully Danboy, I shall say this slowly for you... 1) If the ONLY ASSET AVAILABLE available is a £5M plane then this IS NOT considered as excessive levy. 2) Bailiffs ARE SENT FOR GOODS not money. However, commonsense dictates that this is a last resort and every bailiff would rather get paid than remove anything. 3) Pop in for a cup of tea when you're passing.

PT is correct. It is the defendant that can apply to have the fees assessed by a Master etc. twonames, there is no mention of 'reasonable charges' in Fee 12. However, it would be foolish of an HCEO company to charge a fee they cannot justify. HCE Group are a large company that have several offices and many staff. The costs of running this will be reflected in their fees charged under Fee 12.

It was always 3 months training when I first started. I dont know if things have chnaged.