Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. Happyhippy1959

    Happyhippy1959

    Registered Users

    Change your profile picture


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      1,002


  2. Ed999

    Ed999

    Registered Users

    Change your profile picture


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      1,271


  3. ploddertom

    ploddertom

    Registered Users

    Change your profile picture


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      12,867


  4. TweedleDee

    TweedleDee

    Registered Users

    Change your profile picture


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      49


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/11/11 in all areas

  1. oh P1 we thought it was too good to be true.... is it Westcotts coming out the woodworm now... !!!!!!!!!!!!! if we saw off the mad carter maybe this is going to be a one sided match P1, my money is on U,,, we should open a book on who will crawl out of the woodworm next... I have JB love em.... can't wait for there begging letter...
    1 point
  2. The Set Aside Hearing only deals with your debt and not the involvement per se of the HCEO. It will basically boil down to this - do you owe, if so how much & how are you going to pay, otherwise you are replacing one CCJ for another so are no further forward. Don't forget all commercial debts are Forthwith Judgments. Did you initially receive all the Court docs or was the first you knew about this was when the HCEO turned up. Has the Claimant tried to claim £10k when in fact you only owed £1 for example. The more you can prove they are wrong the better. Did they try to ask nicely for their cash or just bulldoze ahead with litigation.
    1 point
  3. Not a problem. When I mean by good reason is a good reason for this hearing to take place in front of a judge instead of a court officer. You do not want the hearing in front of the judge in the first instance because the normal process is that you or your representative will have to question the debtor, no written record will be kept as you will be doing the questioning but there will be a recording, and form EX140 will not be used. The alternative is that the court officer will question the debtor along the lines of EX140 as well as your addendum. So I would personally go with the court officer. It is another option to consider but yo
    1 point
  4. This is the wrong forum for such a question. Your caravan or mobile home is not a type of leasehold property, but is governed by the complexities of the Caravan Sites Act and the Mobile Homes Act, which together create a complex statutory scheme to regulate such sites. You may need to consult a Solicitor. In the first instance you should probably speak to the Citizens Advice Bureau - • Find your nearest CAB office • On-line: Citizens Advice Bureau
    1 point
  5. They are committing an offence under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and I would use that act against them and also claim compensation. As it is a criminal offence you can involve the police and they are obliged to act on your complaint. Alternatively as you have already sent them a letter, send them another letter registered mail advising that if they contact you or your family again you will escalating the matter and seeking compensation through the courts for undue harassment under the Harassment Act or something along those lines.
    0 points
  6. Is this Phillips & Cohen all the time or is any other company chasing. Brig.
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...