Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify - I make use of evening legal clinics. It is not always possible to see a lawyer (they have limited time and days/week).  This means questions one has may never get answered or there's weeks between follow-ups.   To be really clear - I am representing myself; I am playing at being lawyer/ barrister - which means I take help wherever I can get it (and then research it thoroughly). Ae - a judge in a recent hearing pointed out the receiver is not part of my current proceedings - and suggested I have a separate claim v the receiver. Disclosure has presented damning evidence v the receiver  The receiver against whom I have a complaint is not part of the receiver governing body.   The receivership is in 2 names - a joint one.  My complaint is directed at whom I was told is the lead receiver.  The other named receiver IS a member of the governing body.  But he has now left the company.  And the lead receiver has retired - but is still a working consultant on my case.   All the evidence shows it was the 'lead' receiver who was doing all the  work/ the misbehaviour.   But if the appointment was 'joint' would I make a complaint against them both?    I am sure that wouldn't go down well with the other receiver who is at the beginning of his career. The law is very much against borrowers.   But the evidence against this receivership is crystal clear.   I just don't know how and to whom to complain.   The places I've tried so far don't offer much transparency       
    • Ok, noted, thanks again. I'll share details of every communication received just to make sure.
    • Yes. I sent back the PAP form stating they hadnt supplied the correct paperwork and that pdf is what they sent back
    • have you responded to the letter of claim?
    • It's probably a good idea to come back here when the next letter from them turns up.  It remains to be seen if they will act on your employer's communication or will just continue with the cycle of their daft "threatening" letters.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Eviction in 2 weeks, GE Money TIME ORDER APPLICATION


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Apologies if this is a common thread but Iv been reading for hours and coming up short and getting more and more confused as time goes on.

 

I have had some advice which was very honest but has left me even more confused because i have two options so I figured I have nothing to lose by asking! Naturally I would prefer comments where PEOPLE KNOW what they are talking about as I have had enough guesses!!

 

My situation is that I have a loan with GE Money which is a second charge secured loan which was originally £13,000 and is still £11,405 with about £7,000 arrears and only 1 year remaining.

 

I understand the loan to be covered under the Consumer Credit Act and I have been told that this gives me the option of applying for a time order, however I dont really know what this means and certainly dont know how to apply for one other than filling out an N440 application.

 

The reason I was directed towards a time order is that it apparently gives the Judge the power to grant more time to my loan as I only have about a year left and to clear the arrears over that period id very high.

 

My eviction however is in 2 weeks. Is it too late to apply for a time order, will it be considered or just rejected and the eviction enforced?

 

It was suggested that i apply an N244 application to get a suspended order to either agree to the ridiculous overpayment, or ask for time to sell, and then apply for the time order once the eviction is out the way.

 

I just dont know the validity of either approach or the liklehood of getting them through, time is running out, and I have to do something!!

 

 

Any well founded advice is very welcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is no possibilty of you paying the loan off before it's end date then there is no point in entering an N244 to get a hearing to stop the eviction as the judge would look at the remaining term of the loan. It would seem a Time order is your best option, but the cost of the application is £150. If you can't afford to make monthly instalments which would clear the arrears before the end of the agreement then you should request that the loan and arrears be re-scheduled. However, for the court to allow a time order, you do need to be able to make an offer of payment. The court will then decide whether they think you can afford to pay what you have offered or if they think you could offer more.

 

Make sure you add any information that might help your case, such as:

 

• The reason you took out the credit

• You could afford the credit when first took out, but can no longer.

• Your payment record was always good until you stopped paying.

• Your creditor has refused to negotiate with you.

• Is your situation likely to improve in the future?

 

Also if you feel that the interest rate on your agreement is very high, you could argue that it is extortionate credit under the Consumer Credit Act. However, it can be very difficult to persuade the court of this.

 

I have affixed a Time order form to this post.

 

Hope this is helpful.

n440- time order.pdf

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ell enn thank you for such a quick response!

 

I can offer to make the payments inline with the end of the term however, with me having ignored the loan for some time, my concern is that i dont think they will believe my affordability has suddenly recovered! I researched all the law in this regard however, c&g v Norgan and admin of justice Act etc and it appears pretty strong, if only my term was longer!!

 

Is there any legal background law on a time order that I need to quote about the Judges ability to make such an order? Or am I to simply trust that the Judge will understand it all? ie is a Time Order UNDER the Consumer Credit Act? does it have a specific section or is a Time Order something different entirely? And is it not too late to file one??

 

Filing one on my current knowledge base feels like I am leaving it very much to chance which is not how I would prefer to move forward!

 

Also how do I explore the issue on getting time to sell? Is that potentially a stronger argument, i have an estate agent confirming the value and that I have £20,000 in equity, but Iv read quite conflicting results that the property "must be on the market" to "you MUST have exchanged contracts"

 

Please forgive all the questions, I just cant afford to pay out for this information and am trying to make sure i dont get torn to pieces by handling it myself!

 

Thanks

 

Mouldy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I'm at work at the moment so don't have much time. If you need help with understanding the application for a time order and the relevant case laws etc. give National Debtline a ring (0808 808 4000), they are really good at this sort of thing - I think they also have a pretty good factsheet on this subject - and will be able to answer your questions much quicker than I will as it may be later this evening before I get a chance to advise you more fully.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that Ell-enn Il see if I can get the boss to let me have 30 mins t phone them! I cannot realistically make any applications before tomorrow anyway so any further advice later would be appreciated if you are not to drained after work.

 

thannks

 

Mouldy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi mouldy .... How did you get on? I'm in a similar situation myself ......

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...