Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jb-sky Tv


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5571 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my first visit to a forum. I don't know if anyone can help with any ideas to what my rights are. I am getting worried about an issue I have with Sky and JB Debt Collection. It's quite an indepth problem and I will try and explain it as simple as possible.

I owed a Pub with my sister and we had sky TV for approx 2 years. The contract start date was 1st Sept. In July 2008 I had a letter from sky explaining the new services from sept and we phoned them to say we would carry it on. The business was struggling and unfortunately in August the Bank pulled the plug and we could not continue trading.

We phoned sky straight away and they said that although it was only 2 weeks after we had contacted them we had entered into a verbal agreement to have sky up to Sept 2009. They would not accept that the new contract had not started etc. After serveral phone calls they agreed to look into it and told us to write in giving our circumstances, which I did and received a reply from them to say they were passing it to the team leader to look at and would contact us about it. After several months we had not heard from them and I contacted sky again after getting a Final demand for the 12 months sky and the letter stated it would be passed on to their legal team. They said the person dealing with it had left and because it had been passed over to the debt collection agency they could not do anything.

When I had a letter from JB Debt collection I contacted them and told them I was still in dispute with sky about this. The man on the phone was very forceful and said I would have to pay for the full amount. They have tried contacting me a couple of times again and after reading some of the advice on these forums I sent them a letter stating I would not deal with this matter over the phone and that as I was still in dispute with sky they should not be chasing payment. Sky have never sent me a letter regarding my 1st request to have this looked at so as far as I'm concerned it is not resolved.

I don't know now where I stand as sky will not talk about the account as it has been passed on, and I do not want to deal with JB Debt.

I'm sorry this is so long winded but I'm at my wits end and don't know what to do.

 

Please could anybody give me any advice on what to do next

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sky can deal with accounts that is passed to any DCA.

 

Email a detailed complaint to [email protected] and back up with a letter to British Sky Broadcasting Limited of Grant Way, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5QD.

 

Email so you can put the action in motion quicker.

 

Dear Sky Business,

 

I/We were sky business subscribers from 1st septemeber 2006. We were conacted about new services available to us from September 2008. I called on xx August 2008 to say we would be happy to receive these services from September 2008. At no point was I advised that I would entering into a new contract at that time and I certainly did not agree to it and if I had been advised I would have declined the new services.

The business failed in August 2008 and I/we notified sky immediatley to cancel.

 

I have pervioulsy contacted Sky several times and was advised a Team Leader would investigate this further and at no time has anyone from Sky contacted on closure of this dispute. Also I have been advised by operators that they cannot deal with this account as it has been passed to a debt collection agency which Sky and myself are very well aware of untrue.

 

As I did not have a response from Sky after my last conversation when I was advised a Team Leader would investigate the matter, i presumed Sky had recognised the error that has been made. I have now been contacted by JB Debt Collection for recovery of this account and so therefore Sky have disregarded any previous contact from me and not investigated this as was advised.

 

As you will see from your records that I called to cancel this account and if you review the call in August 2008 you will clearly be aware that there was no agreement to any term of length of service of contract.

 

Please can you investigate this matter and confirm that this matter is now closed and you have cleared the balance and informed JB Debt recovery to withdraw.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

 

or something along those lines

 

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Ida

The original complaint was sent to sb2b@bskyb and they are the ones that ignored it.

The only problem I have with the above letter (which is great) is that they did say on the original phone call that the new contract would be up to sept 2009. We were contacting them in the hope that because the new period had not started they might help. We were hoping there may be some way out of it, but I don't think there is. :sad:

Any further advice would be gratefully received

Link to post
Share on other sites

but you have a cooling off period.

 

Edit the above to amend to say you called within cooling off etc and also add that no update t and c's were rec'd.

 

can you add a read receipt to ur emails? if so do it

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Ida.

Letters sent off today by recorded delivery to British Sky Broadcasting Middlesex and by E-mail to [email protected] just have to wait and see now.

 

Had further Telephone call from Debt collector trying to get payment, told them I would no longer deal with this by phone, and because the debt is in dispute he should not be asking for payment. He then put phone down after telling me he would not contact me again. I don't know what their next step will be.

 

Thanks again for advice, will let you know what they come back with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was your contract taken out in a personal capacity, or as Ltd company or partnership? If the latter, and I'm assuming they've already cancelled the service by blocking your viewing card, then you've not really consumed the service. You could tell them to put their claim into the administrators and that will give you a bit more peace...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The contract was taken out over the phone for our Pub. It was a partnership. They turned the signal off around the 3/9/08, we asked them to turn it off prior to this though. We did not receive any of the service they are trying to charge us for. I have seen somewhere that business to business contracts are different to consumer rights??? Is this correct?

 

Can you explain "Put their claim into the administrators" Sorry I'm new to all this and need to get it right.

 

Thanks for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, by this I mean simply tell Sky that the partnership has been dissolved and it no longer exists as a trading entity (I'm assuming this is the case). I'm also assuming this is their B2B contract which does not offer the various protections required of a consumer service contract. (Right to cancel etc etc).

 

Even so, assuming you are no longer trading, then there will have been an an accountant to administer the winding up. You are only beimg chased because they hope to wear you down and you pay them to go away - however it may be more proper for them to pursue whoever is winding up or closing down the business (that's what they are paid for) so if you have their details, just pass these to the DCA and explain that there is nothing else you can do, and to stop calling you regarding this matter. Hopwfully that might do the trick!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfect (almost!). Refer them to the Brewers. Sky base their contracts on the address used by the licenced premises, so say that as the Brewery took back the lease, any matters concerning the continuation or otherwise of entertainment for customers of the pub would be best dealt with them. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely. Imagine you dropped back round and discovered that the TV in the corner was showing Sky...? This would mean they've taken out a new B2B contract with Sky, and therefore Sky are no worse off than before, except they are trying to screw you to make a payment for services you didn't consume.

 

True, they would ordinarily be fully entitled to recieve payment as you specifically agreed to be bound by the contract, but lets not get too worried about Sky's problem, why should they benefit at your expense, when they're no worse off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They might feel a need in the future - why not when telling Sky or thir lackeys to contact the brewery for any imagined debt, they might like to contact the replacement leaseholder and offer their service to them..? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...