Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

welcome finance help


denby
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5987 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am having a few problems with welcome who seem to be FV-1 Incorporated and progressive financial services limited

I took a secure loan with welcome but land registy are showing progressive financial services i have been out work a while and cut my payments to them they took me to court as FV-1 Incorporated to get a restriction on my flat wot does all this mean and can someone tell me were i should go many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Denby welcome to the site.

I will move your post to general debt.

Welcome finance are quite well known to CAG.

You should get some answers to your questions.

Be prepared to answer more questions here for our members to get a little more specific info to help you.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI im with welcome sorry to say i took a loan with them for 15.000 ive paid over 10.000 and still have 22.000 to settle now if i go full term i will be paying 42.000 im be hind on ths they want me to start a new one lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone heard of a company called FV-1. Its not on list as a dca. Would be interesting to know where they are in the dormant league. Global debt recovery have assigned one of my debts to them.

 

 

 

hi im with welcome and FV-1 is something to do with them if you search progressive financial services WF17 9TD they are all under the same roof den

Link to post
Share on other sites

at the bottom of my loan form it s got progessive financial services ltd trading as welcome financial services.

 

are theses the same company = are they door mat =which one would take me to court for reduced payments many thanks den

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it's a secured loan it's the same as a mortgage ie they can go to court to repossess your property if you get 2-3 months in arrears. The agreement itself may be unenforceable in some way so you may want to scan it on here ( personal details removed 0 so that someone can take a look for you.

 

It's difficult to advise without knowing your full situation to be honest - are you claiming all the nefits you're entitled to? Do you have other debts? If so what are they & how much?

Link to post
Share on other sites

see what you mean i was taken to court by FV-1 for the sum of 1,489.38

i was away at the time so did not get the chance to find out what the dept is for i have a ccj for that and a restriction on my flat and 33p a day interest till i sort it.

 

but welcome seem to be a part of FV-1 so i thought it might be the arrears on my acount.

 

but now he has give me seven days to pay another 143.6p and take out a new loan and i said no way take me to court den

Link to post
Share on other sites

A secured loan and a charging order are 2 different things. If you took out a secured loan with Welcome they don't have to get a CCJ to then get a 'restriction' ( I assume you mean a charging order which secures the judgement debt on your property? ) against your home. They can just go to court and ask that the property be repossessed, so it's not a money claim like a normal CCJ but a claim for possession of property.

 

If FV-1 have sued you via the court, got a CCJ in your absence & have since applied for and been granted a charging order then it sounds like either a different agreement altogether or they are trying to claim interest on the original CCJ.

 

It's difficult to be specific without knowing all of the info - you aren't even clear yourself what the CCJ relates to. In theory if a CCJ is granted in your absence & you have a dispute on the debt you could apply for it to be 'set aside' which puts it back to the claim stage giving you the chance to defend the claim.

 

The problem you have is that you would have to show also why you didn't receive any of the notifications about the charging order - there is always a hearing before a final charge is granted which would have been AFTER you defaulted on the original CCJ. You would also have had a letter from the land registry advising that a charge was being applied for.

 

I think you need to find out what the original CCJ relates to and look to do a subject access request to both Welcome & FV-1 to see what you can find out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks you are really helping even if it dont look like it im not very good on the pc so that dont help

 

im not in the uk but my mum is at my flat she opens all my mail she bought it out to me she had no court letters just one from land reg from mortimer clarke who are on a 0845 number that you cant get though on ive e-mail from my cag e-mail and my own but no reply so far

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem - as I say it's hard when we don't know exactly what has gone on... it may be worth ( if you haven't already 0 giving your mum power to act on your behalf in the UK so she could perhaps take everything down to the CAB or similar for you. I'm just very conscious that I don't want to give the wrong advice to you.

 

You can call National Debtline from overseas on +44 121 410 6200

Link to post
Share on other sites

rang national debtline they have been a great help .

 

welcome rang to day with an offer of a new loan 2 years intrest free but they said stick to my guns and say no so let you know how i get on thanks abunch den

Link to post
Share on other sites

i took a secured loan with welcome in 2004 on the loan agreement it has in very small print progressive financial sevices ltd trading as welcome financial sevices though they have different reg numbers

 

the legal charge i have has welcome reg number

but land registry has progressive

 

is this right den

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...