Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Read upload Tells you how with even online sites too Dx 
    • You could forward it to yourself but before you click send, take out your personal details. Does that help? Although I run this forum I am not a massive techie either! But we would like to see it and also to understand who is who – dates, et cetera. What you typed above doesn't really give many clues and certainly only contains one date and time and doesn't identify the order in which they were sent to each other.  
    • Hey, How can I put a copy of the email on here and still keep it confidential? I really do want to give you all the info you need but I'm not tech at all.  I've just emailed the mechanic using your quote as a template. I will let you know what the reply is. Thanks so much everyone
    • In the midst of the parties launching their manifestos this week, we have also received the latest labour market data […]View the full article
    • Thank you. We like to see also the exchange between you and the mechanic/garage telling about the gearbox. Also, send an email to the garage whose mechanic called you:   Get this email to them as soon as possible. Hopefully it will draw a response which will confirm what they say – but even if it doesn't draw response – as long as there is no denial then it is fine. Even if there is a denial, it won't be too important but it would certainly be nice to get a paper trail which supports what you say. Please send this off and come back here and confirm that you've done it
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Have you had a court summons from a PPC. Did the PPC show up?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5972 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There seems to be an ongoing debate on this forum as to whether the PPC's actually show up at court when faced with a "properly prepared" defense.

 

I think this question can be settled by inviting CAG members to share their experiences.

 

So can you post up

 

1. Have you had an invoice from a PPC [y/n]

2. Did you refuse to pay it [y/n]

3. Did they take you to court [y/n]

4. What was the final outcome

a) judgement for the PPC

b) judgement for the defendant including counterclaim against PPC

c) no show by the PPC (i.e. victory for defendant)

d) withdrawl of proceedings by plaintiff

e) a load of letters and then silence - no court dates

 

Let's keep a running score and see how it goes. I'll count a yes to question 2 and option a to question 4 as a "victory for the PPC and the rest as "victory" against the PPC's.

 

One thing I would ask is that you be prepared to provide proof of the above esp. if it went to court, judgement, transcripts, and court bundles.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should 4d not read withdrawal of proceedings by the PPC.

 

The defendant cannot wothdraw proceedings that they did not initiate.

 

Also, if taken to court by a PPC, I qould be counterclaiming for my time and expenses, so a no-show would be judgement in my favour - really a victory.

 

This may be a way to counter an no-show by the PPC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should 4d not read withdrawal of proceedings by the PPC.

 

The defendant cannot wothdraw proceedings that they did not initiate.

 

Also, if taken to court by a PPC, I qould be counterclaiming for my time and expenses, so a no-show would be judgement in my favour - really a victory.

 

This may be a way to counter an no-show by the PPC

Good points Pat. I've corrected the original post. Apologies if my posts are a bit ropey I've not slept much in the past 2 days after having a tooth removed.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent idea. I Will keep you posted. Mine is a bit early days yet (only been going since December.) My last letter (after two threats) was only about 2 weeks ago, asking for a court date. I will give it 28 days and post here.

Maybe this should be made a sticky... If that's my understanding it's kinnda what everyone wants to know... results.. action and consequence...

 

I am not paying them a penny until I have had my day in court at which point I anticipate the judge (their majesty) will buy me a beer afterwards having found in my favour, and apologise about the fact that decent people have to waste a day turning up to defend a totaly futile claim by a bunch of decidedly shady individuals. I actually want a day in court.... it's not like I'm not used to it!!!!!

 

I AM PROPER CHEESED:mad: :mad: :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This story has been done to death both here and on pepipoo. There were 3 uncontested cases which S&B "won" by virtue of the defendants not turning up. S&B similarly failed to turn up for cases which were defended. The Lancashire telegraph has subsequently printed retractions to put right inaccuracies in the original article.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

had just finished my post then saw BBs reply. So modified my post. So thats 3 non defended cases that the PPCs have won. How many of the 200 reported in the article defended. I hope it was the other 197.:-) lol

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry :o I'll get my coat.

 

Storm heads for the door ....

 

Sorry Storm,

 

Didn't mean to offend anyone, perhaps I did come across a bit strident.

 

It is just that this was paraded as a great victory by the PPC brigade at the time. It took a deal of digging by Pepipoo members, complaints to the Press Association etc to get the paper to publish the actual truth of it. Predicably the retraction was much less prominent than the original story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...