Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Consequences


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6470 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

IF you win your case on an account that has been defaulted due to illegal charges you can insist that the default is removed.

 

If however in the meantime you have been refused credit or forced into accepting sub prime interest rates it must be possible to to make a case for repayment of the extra interest or compensation from the bank who issued the default notice in the first place.

 

Any one have any ideas on this

You may think that but . . ......

____________________________________

Total repaid to date £1947.58

 

Lloyds Currrent a/c £745.27

Moneyclaim filed 17th June

Defence and AQ 25th July. Case struck out 11 Aug

reinstated and hearing 15th Jan 2007

 

Lloyds loan a/c D A request expired 19th June

Proceedings under S7 Data Protection Act issued 29th June defence and counterclaim 27 July

Hearing Jan 3 2007

Listed final hearing April 2007-

Judge declared an interest and disqualified himself

new date to be set

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF you win your case on an account that has been defaulted due to illegal charges you can insist that the default is removed.

 

If however in the meantime you have been refused credit or forced into accepting sub prime interest rates it must be possible to to make a case for repayment of the extra interest or compensation from the bank who issued the default notice in the first place.

 

Any one have any ideas on this

 

You are correct...indeed one user had to take out a £10,000 loan to deal with the debts that charges had caused - his bank refunded that along with the charges.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be surprised if you were to get away with that. Thats not to say I'm a firm believer

that the banks are still getting away with murder when they refund our money. In many case, peoples lives are ruined because of these excessive charges, and it can lead to marriage/relationship difficulties, stress, depression and, in the case you mentioned, having to compromise in accepting a higher rate of interest than you would should there be no credit problems.

 

However, proving all of the above could be incredibly difficult and possibly very costly.

 

And can you prove that the rate you took up was the best that market could offer you at the time - they could well argue that had you spent enough time there would have been a better deal so it was ultimately your fault.

 

A hard one to prove I'm afraid and not a fight I would like to take on.

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be surprised if you were to get away with that. Thats not to say I'm a firm believer

that the banks are still getting away with murder when they refund our money. In many case, peoples lives are ruined because of these excessive charges, and it can lead to marriage/relationship difficulties, stress, depression and, in the case you mentioned, having to compromise in accepting a higher rate of interest than you would should there be no credit problems.

 

However, proving all of the above could be incredibly difficult and possibly very costly.

 

And can you prove that the rate you took up was the best that market could offer you at the time - they could well argue that had you spent enough time there would have been a better deal so it was ultimately your fault.

 

A hard one to prove I'm afraid and not a fight I would like to take on.

 

I agree I personally wouldn't like to take on that battle but could your credit file not come in handy here?

If you applied to various "high street" banks and were declined could that not be used as evidence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I think it could

I have a default entry on my file issued by the RBS

Earlier this year I applied to the HSBC for an account and was refused.

After looking at my credit file recently I can see that HSBC did a search and would have seen this info.

Therefore there can be a good arguement for it.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Come on guys. There must be a way we can claim compensation.

 

If someone (eg. newspaper company) slagged off someone and that someone then found it hard to find a resonable payed job becuase of his/her reputation caused by the newspaper could he/she not seek compensation. Hasnt this been done over and over before?

 

I am currently in progress with having a default removed. Although would like compensation too since they have caused me distress and forced me to pay higher interested rates to lenders to to the reputation they have spread about me.

 

Any thoughts?

Barclays - Success. Total £3000.

Barclaycard - Success. £2500

Barclays Brother - Success £500ish

Vodafone - Default removal + claim for distress. Settled default removed = £1000 in compensation + £120 court costs paid. :D

-------------------------------------------------

Barclays using fowl play - Here

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are ways to go about it.

but it has to be clearly explored..........

You would need to take sep action if this aint running alongside a claim,although it is feasible to do the 2 at the same time.

You should read a few posts on the site about this...........its not something that can be answered in a few lines.

 

;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...