Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Naughty naughty, Arrow Global again


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5541 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You've gotta love this lot, they could fill up a forum on their own...

 

They took over an account of mine in c.Nov 07 and soon after appointed CBS Transcom to mange on their behalf - that's for another thread... :D

 

Anyway, the last time I checked my CRA files before then was sometime 2006, maybe late in that year. Everything was as it should have been and I made the 'mistake' of destroying the paperwork.

 

My chequered financial past was starting to improve recently and the defaults listed were, I recalled, due to expire either late last year or late this year (there were several!). The original debt now owned by Arrow was defaulted some time in 2003. I thought it was time to recheck my file so sent off for the statutory report at £2 from Experian (initially just from there).

 

I don't mean to sound like Rolf Harris, but "Can you guess where this story is going yet?"

 

You're ahead of me, I know...

 

Arrow Global had, of course, amended my credit files to show that I had defaulted not in 2003, but in Nov 2007 (the date, of course, that they took over the debt). I sent off for the report from the other two CRAs and they confirmed the same.

 

I sense a fight brewing :D

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jonnie2bad

Know how you feel. I battled to get 5 defatuls off my credit file which I did with the help of CAG in 2007. The last one to come off was a cap one account. They wrote to me saying they didnt accept liability but would pay back the charges and remove the default. They did this then promptly sold my non-existant account to Robinson Way. I eventually got this removed after a battle. You are probably ahead of me. Yes checked the file last week and Robinson Way had put it back on last month. I have contacted Experian but nothing happened yet. What a bunch they all are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My letter to the three CRAs who hold the information... This one being to Experian (some detailed removed);

 

Consumer Help Service

EXPERIAN

PO Box 9000

Nottingham

NG80 7WP

Xxxxxx

 

Re: Inaccurate personal data – Arrow Global Receivables Management Ltd

Report Reference No.: XXXXxxxxxxx/ Entry Reference Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dear Sirs

 

 

Having recently reviewed my credit files, it has come to my attention that the above named company have erroneously placed information about the date on which my contract with the original lender was defaulted.

The account in question was defaulted under a termination notice executed by the original lender, Universal Credit. Arrow Global purchased the debt, all rights and obligations in Xxxxxxxxx and it is apparent that they have either mistakenly updated my credit files to suggest that this was the date of default or, in the alternative, that the entry has been made with their full knowledge and in contradiction of the Data Protection Act (1998).

This incorrect information is damaging to my reputation and credit-worthiness, and is also the cause of much anguish - any company that searches my file would draw a false conclusion about my financial position.

You have a duty of care not to process incorrect information about me. Furthermore, upon instruction about the error, you have a duty of care to rectify the error at the earliest opportunity.

As the purchaser of delinquent debts it would be clear to anyone that, in order for Arrow Global to be the collector of monies from me, the standard business relationship with the original lender and myself must have broken down BEFORE the outstanding debt was sold to them – this would have been the point at which Xxxxxxxxxx issued a Default Notice – the debt subsequently being sold to Xxxxxxxxxx and then to Arrow Global Ltd.

I am sure that you will also be aware that an account can only be defaulted once and that a default can only be placed after a formal default notice has been served under Section 87 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

I have today made a formal complaint to Arrow Global.

If Arrow Global are unable to produce evidence of the date at which my account was defaulted then I would remind you that, as a data processor, you would be in breach of the Data Protection Act for continuing to publish inaccurate personal data about me. Under such circumstances, you are obliged to remove the entry in its entirety.

If you retain archived copies of previous paper reports then you will be able to access the true date of default from a report I ordered from you approximately 2 years ago. I imagine the debt will be shown as owned (at that time) by Xxxxxxxxxxx. If you do have such an archive, I would appreciate a copy of the report being forwarded to me and would be prepared to pay the appropriate fee for production and postage of it.

I look forward to your prompt response.

Yours faithfully

 

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

2 out of three resolved so far.... a partial success.

 

Here's the response from Experian (Equifax response was very similar) indicating that the entry has been removed completely. No response yet from CallCredit!!!

 

I will let you guess if Arrow themselves have responded :cool:

 

Arrow.pdf

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It has now been removed from CallCredit's file too.. ;)

 

CallCredit Reply.pdf

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still no reply from Arrow - they must think we're playing hide-and-seek :p

 

Hello Arrow - I CAN SEE YOU !!!

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the look of the football league table, it's either this or nothing!

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...