Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update to this case as I’ve not been on in a while.    I am still awaiting a charging decision in the case. The two police officers involved have said their personal belief is a section 47 ABH charge is the most likely outcome but this isn’t a sure thing of course.    The EA certificate from the issuing court has now lapsed. The court have refused to recertify him until they’ve had a hearing in to the case, and the district judge has issued orders to surrender all evidence, footage, photos etc.    I have done so promptly.    the EA, not so much . Equita have claimed they cannot provide his bodycam footage as the camera he was wearing is the EA personal one not one of theirs.   the EA has claimed he has asked Equita and the police for the footage as he claims he doesn’t have it.    the police have confirmed they didn’t seize his camera and they don’t have it.    so they are basically pointing the finger at each other all the while failing to comply with the district judges order to provide all evidence they intend to rely on at the rescheduled hearing.    The district judge has stated the hearing for his certification will NOT be the hearing for my complaint as there is no charge as of yet, and just as to whether he should be recertified or not.    I’m not 100% on why that can’t be done at the time, but I’m not about to question a judge…..      
    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.   House or Flat? Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Again, points as above. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) Why serve a delapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease. I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to buy the freehold of the property. It's normal, whether it is a "normal" leaseholder or a repossession with a leasehold house, to claim this right of enfranchisement and sell the property with said rights attached and the purchase price of the freehold included in the final completion price. That's likely what the mortgage provider wished to do. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at? Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. So this is dealt with then. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.  You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension. You'd need a Deed of Variation for that. This may be done at the same time but the lease has already been extended once and that's all they have a right to. The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved. The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there. Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

FORUM RULES - Please read these before posting


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6681 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

1 GENERAL

 

1.1 This website is owned by Reclaim The Right Ltd, 923 Finchley Road, London, NW11 7PE, and operates under the names Consumer Action Group, National Consumer Service, Consumer Forums, Debt Action Group and Bank Action Group. It will be referred to here as "The Group".

 

1.2 Please be aware that all advice on this website is provided informally by concerned volunteers.

 

1.3 The Group holds out no particular expertise or qualification.

 

1.4 The Group is not responsible for the views or actions of its users who post on this website.

 

1.5 The Group makes no guarantee of the accuracy of any of the advice or information which is provided on these pages and you are advised to apply your own judgment at all times or contact a qualified professional.

 

1.6 The Group is merely a campaign and support group.

 

1.7 Above all else, use your common sense, be respectful and reasonable to people and companies.

 

1.8 Bank and other company staff: Whether you like them or not, they are just doing their job. Please do not refer to these people in any personal insulting or offensive way. They are not the policymakers in their organisations and are only doing a job.

 

1.9 Hijacking: Please don't hijack someone else's thread, no matter how closely their story resembles yours. Start a thread specific to your case - that way it is easier for people to keep track of, and thus offer you better help.

 

1.10 Copyright Information

 

a) All information contained in this website, associated websites, and forum posts are copyright Reclaim The Right Ltd. If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere, then please email the administrators for permission.

 

b) When you post on this forum you retain copyright in what you write. However, by posting on our forum you grant us an irrevocable non-exclusive licence to publish what you have written. Non-exclusive means that you are fully at liberty to repeat or copy your posts elsewhere on the Internet. However by posting on our forum, you grant us permission to keep the material published on the forum. Some references to your post may be posted up on social media to draw attention to your story.

We may of course remove what you have written or exceptionally edit what you have written to make your post comply with any changes in forum policies as they develop from time to time. You agree to these conditions by registering with us and by posting on the forum. For these purposes, "the forum" means the website in general and includes The Consumer Forums and associated Internet addresses. This could mean that your post or extracts from it may appear in more than one place on the Site. You do not grant us any permission to publish what you write anywhere else on the Internet. That right remains solely with you.

 

1.11 Please understand that The Group has been formed, and is run by, concerned volunteers. However, we do acknowledge the kind help of the very generous individuals who contribute to the site by way of donations - indeed without such kind donations we would not be able to continue. If you feel that you would like to contribute to the expenses then please use the "Donations" button at the top of each page or contact site administration (admin@consumeractiongroup.co.uk).

 

1.12 Despite the use of the word "Member" from time to time as embedded in the forum software, there is no membership and persons registered with this group are “users” and enjoy no rights of membership. Users are extended the facility of this forum at the discretion of The Group owners. All users of this forum, including the Site Team, are just that, “users”. They are not associated with The Group or its founders - their actions are entirely their own and The Group cannot be held responsible for their actions. The Group's founders are BankFodder and Dave.

 

1.13 Please note that these rules and guidance also relate to the use of the website’s Personal Message (PM) facility, and the user's profile, signature and avatar.

 

 

 

 

2 WHAT ARE TEAM MEMBERS?

 

2.1 Our Team Members are here to monitor and where necessary move, edit, lock or delete threads/posts in order to protect the good of The Group. They may also be referred to elsewhere as "Moderators".

 

2.2 If a thread/post is moved, edited, locked or deleted... it will not be a personal attack on you. It will only be as a result of the guidelines below and will always put the site first. If you attempt to re-post information that has been unapproved then you will be in breach of the rules yourself and subject to further action as deemed appropriate, and as outlined in section 7.

 

 

 

 

3 FORUM POSTS

 

3.1 It is important to remember that posts made on this website are being made in the public domain, and will be visible to anyone who accesses the website. You should therefore think carefully about what you post, and avoid including anything within your post (or your user ID, signature, or public profile) that will enable people to personally identify who you are and/or where you live.

 

3.2 Please be aware that all posts made on a public forum are regularly archived by search engines and other on-line services which may hold copies for many years. Even if the post is removed from this website (or edited by you) the original may still be available to the general public as a cached copy. These cached copies are held by third parties (such as Google, Yahoo, Waybackmachine etc) and we have no control whatsoever on how long these are held, and who can gain access.

 

3.3 Please note that you may edit a post you have made (provided that your account is not subject to moderation or restriction) for a period of 8 minutes after posting - in order to allow for corrections on spelling etc, however you cannot edit a post after that time, or remove, rename, or edit a thread that you have started.

 

3.4 If you feel that a thread should be removed for legal reasons, please contact site administration (admin@consumeractiongroup.co.uk), with a link to the thread concerned, and details of why you consider the thread should be removed. Threads will not be removed simply because the issue has been resolved, or because a company does not want "bad publicity" to remain in the public domain.

 

3.5 A thread/post will be edited or deleted if it contains:

 

a) Xenophobia, racism, personal abuse, or incitement intended to cause disruption within a thread (commonly known as a "flame war")

b) Sexually explicit content, pornography, links to Pornography or links to other inappropriate sites

c) Touting for business in any way – including the posting of customer recommendations

d) Offering to advise members or asking members for advice by PM or email without good reason - If it is felt that a subject is "sensitive" and would be better discussed off-forum, we ask that members contact a member of the site team BEFORE asking for contact details. This rule is in place to protect our members from claims touts, and also to ensure that any advice given is open to debate, qualification, and where necessary, correction.

e) Advice that is likely, or could potentially, cause damage to another user either legally or financially.

f) Any form of unauthorised advertising or “spam”, advertising the sale of illegal bootleg material, and any type of pyramid selling or referral schemes

g) Any copyright-infringing content

h) Anything invasive to an individual’s personal privacy unless it is reasonable and proportionate to ensure the protection of consumers

i) Illegal, defamatory, or potentially defamatory statements

j) Any attempts to avoid moderation, and disregard for the interests of The Group

 

3.6 Swearing is generally subject to automatic censoring – however, mild versions of swearing (e.g. s**t) can sometimes be considered as acceptable subject to the context and location on the website. Offensive words, or over use of swear words, will result in action from the Site Team. Any deliberate circumvention of the swear word filter is prohibited. If you are unsure what constitutes swearing, don't type it.

 

3.7 In the “Bear Garden” forum, more leeway is given over the use of swearing and the nature of the topics discussed. However, the restrictions in section 3.5 will still be applied.

 

3.8 The Group reserves the right to delete or edit any thread/post for legal or any other reasons.

 

3.9 A thread/post will be closed if:

 

a) There is persistent abuse of the site rules

b) It contains unacceptable behavior or anti community spirit

c) It contains totally off-topic discussion

d) It has content that is not salvageable by editing the thread/post

 

3.10 A thread/post will be moved to another part of the website if:

 

a) The topic clearly belongs in another forum

b) The posts in a topic move on to a subject more appropriate to another forum

 

3.11 What is “potentially libelous” as per rules 3.5(i)?

 

“Potentially libelous” is the term used to describe anything that cannot be proven by hard fact and something that may be considered damaging to the reputation of any individual, company or organisation.

 

Due to legal complications The Group could be considered liable for comments posted by users. The Group must therefore practice continued and consistent due-diligence to protect against potential legal action.

 

This may mean deleting or editing topics/posts containing this kind of content and taking the best action to stop anything potentially libelous being posted in the first place. For this reason any potentially libelous content will be removed immediately it comes to the attention of the Site Team – this is likely to be without warning or explanation. A review of the content will then be made by the site administration, and a decision made as to whether the content can be reinstated, or whether any other action is required.

 

The Group will not enter into discussion about its choices in these matters and the decision of The Group will be considered final.

 

Please be aware that the poster of a defamatory, threatening, or arguably threatening statement or remark may be liable for legal action, and that The Group is unable to protect the identity of any user who posts potentially libelous or defamatory comments. Recent caselaw has made it abundantly clear that Internet forums must pass on any information they hold which could identify the poster where litigation is genuinely being taken - or considered.

 

3.12 Please note that users are granted the privilege to post by the owners of the website. Membership does not infer any right to post, or use any of the site facilities, or any "right to reply" to any post or subject.

 

3.13 Whilst this is likely to be covered elsewhere within these rules, posts that contain comments intended to undermine another user, either personally or professionally, may be edited or removed, and the poster will be placed on moderation. Subsequent breaches of site rules may result in the user, and any associated users, being banned.

 

 

4 USER IDs (USERNAMES)

 

4.1 Please remember that your User ID (username) will be shown on every post you make, and therefore could be used to identify you if it contains your name, location, or a combination of the two - if you have no problem with that then fine. So long as your user ID is not in poor taste, offensive, or likely to breach site rules, any user ID is acceptable that has not already been issued and is acceptable by the software.

 

4.2 If you feel that you need to change your User ID, please contact site administration (admin@consumeractiongroup.co.uk) with your preferred new ID and the reason that you require the change. Please note that it is not possible to delete accounts, however we are happy to disable accounts and remove personal details from our database where a request is made to administration.

 

4.3 It is forbidden for a user to post “on behalf” of another registered user, without first requesting permission from site administration (admin@consumeractiongroup.co.uk). Posts made “on behalf” of users that are banned (or under any account restriction for breaching the site rules), will be considered as a breach of rule 3.5(j) and is likely to result in similar action being taken against your account.

 

4.4 Please note that usernames highlighted in GREEN are customer service representatives who have asked permission from site administration to monitor, and respond to, posts made. Please use your discretion when responding to these users. We have agreed to allow them to post as a means to helping users resolve issues more quickly, however they are not authorised to hassle users, and legally they are bound by data protection legislation from discussing your issue on a public forum - unless you give them permission to do so. If you feel that an authorised customer service representative is acting unlawfully, or is breaching the terms of their membership, please contact site administration ([email protected]).

 

 

 

5 COMMERCIAL COMPANIES AND BUSINESSES, AND THEIR STAFF

 

5.1 It is accepted that companies and businesses may monitor discussions between users either directly relating to their experiences and treatment, or expressing their opinions about how a company or business may operate.

 

5.2 Whilst the Group will generally offer the opportunity to respond to discussions, it reserves the absolute right to restrict or block access without any notice, and without giving any reason for that decision.

 

5.3 Whilst the Group acknowledges that a company or business may wish to claim a “right to reply”, it is at the sole discretion of the Group to allow that right to be pursued on this website.

 

NB: Companies and business invariably have their own website, and access to the Internet and media, and therefore have a platform to promote their views. It seems reasonable that any “right to reply” should be reciprocal, and that where a company refuses to allow its customers a voice on their website, we should not be bound to offer such a voice on this website.

 

5.4 If a Commercial Company, or Business, wishes to post on the forum in a representative capacity, we ask that they first seek permission from site administration (admin@consumeractiongroup.co.uk). Failure to do so may result in posts being removed without notice whilst investigations are made to ascertain whether the user is acting with the full authorisation of the company or business concerned. Usernames highlighted in green have gone through this process.

 

5.5 Staff members of Commercial Companies and Businesses are welcome on this website for their own personal purposes. However, if you intend to enter discussions in support of your employer you will be subject to rule 5.4.

 

5.6 Any company, business, organisation, or any individual posting on behalf of a company, business or organisation, must adhere to Data Protection Legislation. Posts that contain personal data, such as (but not limited to) the name or contact details of a user who is posting under an anonymous username, details of money they are alleged to owe, court action that may be being considered or threatend, will be removed, and the site will cooperate fully with users who wish to take legal action, or complain to the Information Commissioner, about such breaches.

 

 

6 JOURNALISTS, MEDIA COMPANIES, CONSUMER & OFFICIAL BODIES, SCHOOL/UNIVERSITY PROJECTS

 

6.1 In order to verify that requests for help with news stories, investigations, surveys, research projects, etc., are genuine, we ask that an official request for permission be made to site administration (admin@consumeractiongroup.co.uk) BEFORE any posts are made, or any attempt is made to directly contact our users. Failure to do so may result in posts being removed without notice whilst investigations are made to verify that the request is genuine.

 

NB: We cannot advise more strongly that journalists and media companies contact administration to discuss the story/article/programme they are working on. There are numerous options open to ensure that you can access the information you need as quickly as possible, and by talking to us we can look at the best options to help you with your project.

 

 

 

 

7 ACCOUNT RESTRICTIONS

 

7.1 Users who post anything that is likely to require the intervention of the Site Team (see section 3) may find that their account is restricted in some way.

 

7.2 There are various options available to the Site Team when dealing with users who have broken site rules. These include (but are not restricted to) the removal of individual posts, restriction or removal of the site’s Private Messaging facility, moderation (meaning a user’s posts will be subject to checking prior to them appearing on the forum), and in more serious instances, a user may be banned.

 

7.3 If any action is taken against a user, any subsequent attempt to bypass moderation will result in a ban.

 

7.4 It is forbidden to share your account log-in details with another user, or to use another person's account to gain entry to the site. The Group reserve the right to place account restrictions on any user who permits others to access the site using their account.

 

7.5 Whilst we do not forbid the use of second accounts, we will restrict site access to users who create multiple usernames in order to abuse the process of forum postings - for instance when one account is used to give an apparent weight of opinion or to validate the statement of their other accounts. In such circumstances, both (or all) usernames may face restrictions.

 

7.6 The Group will not tolerate racist comments (no matter how innocent the comment may be), or any form of cyber-bullying, religious hatred, xenophobia, or any comments that could be seen as insulting to the beliefs and lifestyle of others. Any breach of this rule may result in the user being banned, and/or potentially more serious action being taken.

 

 

 

 

8 RULES RELATING TO COMMERCIAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL LINKS AND POSTINGS

 

8.1 If you sell products or services, you must not initiate posts or discussion on, or refer to, your business. You may also not discuss product pricing or availability of products.

 

8.2 Advertising or soliciting for any activity that may be construed as commercial is not allowed on the forums. Examples of this would include (but are not limited to):

 

a. Claims management services

b. Premium telephone lines and services

c. Websites / Companies that sell legal advice or documents

d. Traders (retail or wholesale) not specifically approved by CAG

e. Websites that purport to offer "free" advice, but in reality require payment to access information, or are conduits for claims management or any other commercial enterprise

 

8.3 Links to non-commercial and free advice sites are permitted, provided they are not posted by the owners of the site concerned, and that there is no direct financial gain involved with the recommendation.

 

8.4 Site owners may be allowed to publicise their site, however before any post is made, they should first seek permission from the website administration (admin@consumeractiongroup.co.uk) giving full details, and a link to the site concerned. Any posts made pending a decision will be moderated.

 

8.5 Any posts outside the scope of these rules may be edited or deleted without warning. The Group also reserves the right to remove any link posted on this website at the sole discretion of the Group. For the avoidance of doubt, this policy also includes links posted within a user profile or signature.

 

8.6 Please note that if a user does post any advertisements in breach of the above they are likely to face restriction of their account.

 

8.7 Continued disregard for these rules will result in the user being banned.

 

8.8 Please note that adverts posted on the website by the owners are intended to help fund the work of the site, and are for products that have been approved by the site owners. Advertisements that are shown as a result of clicking links, or are noted as being provided by an outside company (such as Google, Yahoo, Fastbox, Syndicated Searches, etc.) are not necessarily endorsed by the site owners, and users should use their own discretion when following these links and considering whether to use the service offered.

 

 

9 INTERPRETATION AND AMENDMENTS

 

9.1 The Group reserve the right to amend these rules at any time, and without any notice, in order to clarify and deal with new issues.

 

9.2 The group reserve the right to interpret these rules at its sole discretion. Use of this website is by the invitation of the Group, and that invitation can be withdrawn at anytime without any notice.

 

9.3 If a user has any issue with action that may have been taken against their account, then they should initially take it up with the Site Team member concerned. If they are unsure who took the action, or did not get a satisfactory response from the Site Team member, then they should contact administration (admin@consumeractiongroup.co.uk). Your complaint will be dealt with in a timely manner, but you are reminded that any decision made in response will be final and non-negotiable. Repeated complaints about the same issue will be ignored.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6681 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...