-
Posts
168,919 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
766
dx100uk last won the day on April 25
dx100uk had the most liked content!
Reputation
12,798 ExcellentAbout dx100uk
Location
-
Location
on an isle..
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
give the SAR another few days . if you get nowt by say tuesday complain to the ICO studio have ignored your legally binding SAR. dx
-
well get reading up then Programmable Search Engine (google.com) clickme^^^^ we are self help too.. you should be blocking and bouncing ALL emails/addresses and blocking their number and reporting the txtx to spam 7726. if you'd read up...you'd have known to do that. dx
-
you dont seem to have uploaded the cancellation box sheet nor anything with a tickbox/dates name typed in //ie your signup agreeing? did they not supply those? ps ive redacted things too...you left your name on both docs..is the address correct for time of takeout for each set of T&C's/Agreement? (note they are diff updated T&C periods) have a look at PRA barclaycard threads already here, you'll see that (base) agreement return already.... its identical.
-
the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx
-
@shiply - courier has vanished with my items please help
dx100uk replied to eml1980's topic in Postal and Delivery Services
well at least you have a crime ref number to use that to frighten people.. -
Advise on debt I currently hold
dx100uk replied to MANUKI12742's topic in Debt management and Debt self-help
a default cal marker will not remove the debt in 6yrs regardless to whatever you do but as ive said 3 times now the issuance and registering of a default notice does. please get reading up.... dx -
Advise on debt I currently hold
dx100uk replied to MANUKI12742's topic in Debt management and Debt self-help
1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.