Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Gem523 v NatWest


Gem523
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've just had a bit of a shock today. I am currently with a debt management company (who are free and don't fleece me!!) and have had some money donated to me by my parents to clear my debt. So, I am currently under negotiation with my creditors (think that's the right word!) for settlement figures.

 

Anyhoo, NatWest (or Unidebt as they are calling themselves) have lead us to believe that my outstanding balance was approx £1600. When my people have contacted them for the full balance to begin settlement negotiations they have this week told them that my total balance is......wait for it........£5987.72!!!! I took this debt out about 7 or 8 years ago and if I recall it was certainly no more than £6k or £7k total back then. I have been paying £71 a month without fail for the last 2-3 years and more before that, which they have readily accepted without query or question. I can only guess then, that the interest charged each month is more than the amount I have been paying each month. Very irresponsible lending in my opinion. So, I thought I was paying off a debt when really it has been growing with venom.

 

I ring Unidebt today and here is what I found out:

  • My balance is £5987.72 but could be fully settled for a lump sum of £3250
  • They do not know how much interest is being charged on my account each month as it is an old account (again irresponsible in my opinion)
  • When my people send pro-rata payment proposals, they do not even look at the balance they have given, which should really lead to a balance dispute and an early warning on my part, but only at the amount offered. If they think that that is an acceptable offer they will accept regardless of how much interest is being charged (again irresponsible)

My debt people have sent me the latest balance provided by Unidebt which stands (I believe) at about £2k which I should receive next week. Unidebt are sending, at my request, a dpa print out detailing all activity on my account over the last 6 years.

 

I personally feel that I could win a fight here, with an argument that NatWest/Unidebt are irresponsible lenders and that they have been stringing me along happy that I am drowning in their account interest charges.

 

What does anyone think? Advice would be VERY gratefully received.

If you do think I have a good fight, how do I go about it??

 

Thanks,

 

A VERY ANNOYED young lady

 

:-x :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before offering reduced settlements to any of your creditors it is a good idea to send them a SAR to see what charges are on the account. You can reclaim these back to reduce the balance. It is also a good idea to see if they have a copy of the credit agreement that you should have signed when taking out credit. If they don't this puts you in a very strong negotiating position for full and final settlement.

 

Always ensure full and fial settlements are accepted in writing before paying any money.

 

Please don't start a new thread in the Natwest forum as it will just get merged with this one.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for getting back to me.

I have already verbally requested the last 6 years account activity so will be able to better fight my cause. As far as I am aware, this does not include any charges as such, just high levels of interest that have accrued. But I will definately be fighting this.

 

From what I gathered today, they won't have any record of my original agreement so hopefully it will put me in a strong position.

 

I think now, I'll just have to wait patiently for all my requested info and come back for more advice when I'm ready to fight my case.

 

:mad::-x:confused::-x:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...