Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

hsbc cca


lolly371
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just write back saying they are now in default due to non compliance with your CCA s78 request and the outstanding amount is now unrecoverable by them, also that if they dont reply within a further calendar month they will be committing a stautory criminal offence.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

No write back to HSBC card services and state they are in default of your s78 request as above plus you also note they are trying to transfer the debt to a 3rd party which is also not allowed under the CCA. Copy the letter to whoever you receved your reply off.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

will this do?

Dear Sir/Madam

Account Reference:

Please be aware that THIS ACCOUNT IS IN DISPUTE.

 

In response to your letter dated 4 August 2007, I would like to inform you that HSBC card services are in default due to non-compliance with my CCA s78 request, which means that the outstanding balance is currently unrecoverable, this also means you cannot transfer the debt to a third party, or enter any defaults on to a credit register without a signed credit agreement. Additionally if I have not received the CCA by 28th Sept you will be committing a statutory criminal offence.

 

As you are aware, A credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a completely indefenceable to any court claim that is issued.Furthermore, please ensure that any contact by yourselves is made in writing only to the above address. Telephone calls and personal visits will not be accepted and viewed as harassment.

 

I would leave all of the pink bit out, they can look it up for themselves if they need to :)

Please note:

OFT response to failing to provide agreement:

For your information, the general effects of sections 77-79 requires the creditor/owner(in the case of a hire agreement) under an agreement for (fixed-sum credit, running account credit and hire agreement) to provide the debtor/hirer with a copy of the executed agreement and a statement of account on request.If a creditor/owner fails to comply with a valid request within a period of 12 days(not including the date of receipt of the request) he may not enforce the agreement at all.This prevents enforcement with or without a court order. If a default lasts for a month(for example a calendar month) it constitutes an offence.A ‘true copy’ of an agreement principally consists of the terms and conditions of the agreement and the statutory content of the agreement. The name, address and signature of the debtor do not have to be provided. Additionally, the creditor must supply the total sum paid under the agreement by the debtor; the total sum which has become payable under the agreement but remains unpaid; and the total sum which is to become payable under the agreement by the debtor (the latter two must include the various amounts comprised in that total sum and the date when each is/was due). However, the copy must be a copy. It need not be exact on immaterial points, but it cannot be a conjectured reconstruction. If the trader has no original copy, the trader will have difficulty showing that he has complied with the regulation by supplying a ‘true copy’, since nobody would know what was in the original. When the trader comes to enforce the debt in court, he needs to have a signed copy of the agreement in order to enforce. As the law stands currently he cannot otherwise.In summary,

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THIS DEBT AND THEREFORE REQUIRE YOU TO SUBSTANTIATE THIS BY PROVIDING THE REQUESTED DOCUNENTATION BEFORE I CORRESPOND FURTHER.

 

 

i have noticed that at the bottom of their letter it says 'Payment Services Bereau is a trading style of Metropolitan Collection Services Limited'. does this mean it still belongs to hsbc. im sure i have heard somewhere that they are just their own collections department.

 

Metropolitan are HSBC's debt collection arm, you have been passed to them because you wrote a CCA request and card services are dumping you :) unfortunatly they cant do that :D

 

pete

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You owe HSBC/Metropolitan money, therefore this is a loan and is covered by the Consumer Credit Act... OR... you dont :) its up to them :D

 

Techinicaly I think you could tell Metro to stuff off "no agreement no debt" but I think you would be on very thin ice when it did come to court.

 

I think you just write them a letter saying as no termas and conditions governing this loan exist this is how much you can afford to pay per week/month and set it up. you tell them the terms :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think involving the ombudsman would do any harm at all. I dont like the way banks pass on debt to their collection agents without notice and once they have they think they are in the clear.

 

I have exactly the same situation on my Citi Card they passed the debt to a collection agent and have actualy writen to me saying we no longer have a contractual link therefore they dont need to send me any response to my CCA request.

 

Wrong, the limitations act means I can look at anything I want up to 6 yers old.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Lolly, If the application form has all the terms and conditions that govern the credit agreement printed on it then your probably on thin ice.

 

The one I got sent back was just my signature and a bland statement saying if a card was granted it would be governed by the terms and conditions of the lender and mentioned two clauses in particular by number. They also sent a set of the up to date terms and conditions which were totally different and didn't have clauses with the numbers on the application form :rolleyes: so check what you have been sent carefully.

 

Apr's do fluctuate but take the higher one when you are calculating the interest due back on your charges :D.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write back and tell them you cant contact the Financial Ombudsman Service and let them know that the bank has now sent you the necessary paperwork because they haven't :).

 

HSBC run this silly formal/informal overdraft system if you ask for an overdraft its formal if you don't and your account goes overdrawn then its informal. It's meaningless twaddle :-)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Lolly you shouldnt allow these phone chasers to get to you :rolleyes: they are generaly very low down in the bank's system and are sometimes paid commission for any money they get you to pay up so they tend to be abrasive.

 

Just stick to your schedule of events and HSBC will be paying your debts off :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...