Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

URGENT advise needed ASAP


oosma
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok ive worked that out :)

Interest works out to £277.32 making a grand total of £ 580.32 much more than they are claiming against me anyone no what i should do now? Rory are you out there anywhere??????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Can you post GE's POC please.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of Claim perhaps!!

 

The Claimants claim is for the sum of £351.01 being moneies due from the Defendant to the Claimant under a regulated credit agreement between the Defendant and GE Capital bank Ltd under reference xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and assigned to the Claimant on the 18th July 2007, notice of which has been given to the Defendant.

 

The Defendant has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served upon Defendant to section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit act 1974.

 

Pursuant to clause 7 of the agreement, the Claimant also claims contractual interest at a rate of 26.478% per annum from the date of these proceedings to the dat eof judgement, or sooner payment, accruing at a daily rate of £0.39.

 

hope this is what you meant

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oosma, I have not done one of these but this is what I would say. Hopefully someone much more knowlegeable will come along and correct it but here goes:

 

I filed an acknowledgement of service on 13 August 2007. At that time I was aware that unlawful penalty charges had been applied to the account but was unable to quantify them. I sent a letter to the claimant, enclosing a cheque for £10, requesting full information about my account with them, a SAR. The cheque cleared my account on 21 August 2007. On 4 September 2007 I received a list of the charges they had applied, however this was not the full information I believe I was entitled to receive and did not assist me in preparing my defence against this claim. As I have been charged interest on these charges I needed further information about the account in order to prepare my defence.

 

I was then informed that judgement had been obtained against me on DATE.

 

Since the account was opened I have been charged £303 in unlawful penalty charges, and such charges continued to be applied in spite of the recent OFT ruling about credit card charges. The interest on these charges amounts to a further £xxx. I therefore request that the judgement be set aside on the basis that I was not given sufficient information by the claimant to prepare my defence and that the amount claimed is represented entirely by penalty charges and interest thereon.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Oosma - they withdrew their claim;). Another one on the go at the moment.

 

Is there anyone out there who can help with Oosma's set aside application? I have tried - see above - but would welcome an expert's opinion.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tried to attract attention but have managed to delete my post:confused: I hope someone will come and help.

 

They withdrew their claim Oosma:p - another one on the go at the moment.

 

Is there anyone out there who can help with Oosma's set aside claim?

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

oosma

 

Sorry no one has got back to you. I have just read through the thread.

 

1. has the judgement now been set aside or have you at least sent back the forms for it to be set aside. The set aside should be requested on the basis that GE Capital did not send you information you requested pursuant to CPR part 40 on 20 August (or whenever you sent it) and so you were not able to make a defence (or counter claim).

 

2. do you have any significant dates coming up - dates when you have been told you need to produce something or hearing dates?

 

3. have you calculated the interest on the list of charges GE capital sent you on 4 September?

 

4. what you need to do is to produce a defence/counter claim based on a PoC for a credit card claim. I have one I used against GE money I will try and post later when I havew modified it a bit.

 

I'll be back soon.:)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Oosma

 

Here is a draft Defence and Counter Claim that you can use. Because it contains a counter claim you will have to pay the appropriate fee to the court.

IN THE XXXX COUNTY COURT CLAIM No XXXXXX

 

GE CAPITAL BANK LIMITED ( TRADING AS GE MONEY)

Claimant

- and -

 

 

OOSMA

Defendant

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

DEFENCE AND COUNTER CLAIM

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Defence

 

1. The Defendant admits it has an account number xxxxxxxxxx, ("the Account") with the Claimant which was opened on or around date.

 

2. During the period in which the Account has been operating the Claimant has automatically debited numerous charges ("the Charges") to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Defendant and also charged interest on the Charges once applied at an annual rate of 29.9%. The Defendant understands that the Claimant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Defendant.

 

3. A list of the Charges (“the Schedule”) applied has been supplied by the Claimant and is attached to this Defence and Counter Claim.

 

4. The Defendant contends that:

 

a) The Charges debited to the Account were punitive in nature; were not genuine pre-estimates of costs incurred by the Claimant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Claimant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Defendant; and were not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enriched the Claimant which exercised the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

 

b) The contractual provision that permits the Claimant to levy the Charges is unenforceable by virtue of

 

i) the Unfair Terms In Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 particularly but not limited to Regulations 5, 6 and 8 and Schedule 2, 1 e); and

 

ii) the common law relating to liquidated damages and penalties in contracts.

 

5. The Defendant avers that, by this action, the Claimant has sought to enrich itself by the consequences of unlawful action, specifically, unlawful penalty charges as detailed above and applied in terrorem.

 

6. The Defendant disputes the Claimant’s claim because the Charges and the interest levied thereon, and which the Defendant contends are unlawful, total £yyy.yy which [exceeds][constitutes the major portion of] the monies claimed by the Claimant.

 

Counter claim

 

7. Accordingly the Defendant claims:

 

a) the return of the Charges in the sum of £xx.xx (amount in words) and the interest of £yyy.yy (amount in words) levied thereon and debited to the Account and detailed in the attached schedule, in the total sum of £xxx.xx (amount in words);

 

b) Court costs;

 

c) Interest under section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per year and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of 0.022%.

 

The Defendant believes that the facts stated in this Defence and Counter Claim are true.

 

 

 

 

Oosma

You will need to alter the bits in purple. In paragraph 6 choose the correct option.

 

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks steven and goldlady

 

Ive been a bit of an ostrich about this and completely avoided it as I have had no further letters since the form to set aside judjement.

 

Will it be to late to get them to set aside the judgement now? or can i still go ahead with the above..im panicking a bit now!!!

 

I have copied and filled in the blanks in the defence that you sent steven but im unsure of the interest rate should i go ahead with the 29.9% also im unsure that ive done the interest right - for example a £15 charge on 16.09.2001 is coming up as £60.11 does that sound right?

 

Also do i still need to apply to set aside the judgement aswell (if its not too late) as sending this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The banks seem to be allowed to submit defences very late - I don't see why you shouldn't. Yes you will need to apply for a set aside as well.

 

On the interest - 29.9% means that the amount doubles every 3 years (approx) so over 6 years it would multiply by about 4 - which is what you are getting - so yes, it looks about right. (the fact that 29.9% interest doubles the amount every 3 years is a fact that seems to be missing from any GE Money store card leaflet I have seen - I wonder why? :rolleyes:)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that needs to be done first - the logic is:

 

You want the judgement set aside because you didn't have chance to submit a defence

You are now submitting a defence

And by teh way, you are making a counter claim.

 

Speak to the court about the best way to do it - they may all go in together or the set aside first.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...