Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Which courts are carrying on????


adam1976brown
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Romford CC are staying matters pending the outcome of the test case.

 

As far as I have seen today, this is the exception though.

 

Business as usual.

  • Haha 1

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 399
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The banks did not agree, although the media spin makes it appear that they did.

 

The banks had no real alternative.

  • Haha 1

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

well just done my follow up phone call regarding Nationwide at Halifax County Court, and they've just dropped me a bomb shell.

Apparently the cheif justice as today announced a blanket stay on ALL courts, when I questioned this the lady said ALL courts ALL claims, and if I were to send my Request for Judgement in with the box A ticked 'The defendent has not filed an admission or defence to my claim etc' then I would just have this returned to me via the post.

She stated the Test case goes to trial in the High Court in October and the stay will be removed no earlier than the 29th February 2008 (if a decision is made by then).:(

I did explain that I had already sent in my claim and wished to continue, but she then stated that she was notifying me that she had put a stay on MY claim there and then which I felt a bit agreived with.

I will risk sending my request for Judgement anyway, even though she said it would'nt go anywhere.:mad:

 

Will try again tommorrow just incase somebody else says something different, and will try and get wording from them.

 

keep you informed

regards

chris

 

Usual nonsense from the banks - DO NOT LISTEN TO THEM THEY WILL TRY UNDERHAND TACTICS TO PUT YOU OFF CLAIMING. There is no blanket stay, judges can decide on a case by case basis. Send in your request for judgement.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...