Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, so just been to see my friend, she still has her head firmly in the sand and had a pile of unopened post, thankfully nothing serious apart from this case!    In answer to your question it says N24 General Directions Order at the bottom of the page, then on page 2 where the line says "As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) " this is N271 Notice of transfer of proceedings.  Within the stack of letters I found 2 from Kearns Solicitors,    02-12-2022 Document pack with covering letter stating under the s78 CCA please see enclosed  1) A copy of the executed Credit Agreement, 2)  A copy of the terms & conditions 3) A copy of the varied terms & conditions applicable at termination / assignment, and  4) A statement regarding the conduct of your account as requested by s78(1)(a) to (c)  (Would you like me to describe the documents attached?)   18-02-2023 Generic letter asking for her to contact them to discuss settlement or they will take to court for further legal action. 
    • well you made the cardinal sin by phoning these scammers at least once so their persistence could go on. however you are new so there you go. you never ever ever phone any of these likes of scammers on these fake schemes that seem plausible.  just like a DCA chasing any old debt .. they are NOT BAILIFFS and have  ZERO legal powers to actually do anything. dx  
    • Okay understood now just based on personal experience how long does this go on for 
    • civil recovery schemes run by the likes of RLP DWF etc etc are a scam. totally IGNORE EVERYTHING. no if's or but's dx  
    • I’m 17 years old and Received 2 letters from dwf with my name spelt wrong and they are asking for for £230.40. I rang dwf civil recovery the first time upon taking advice from citizens advice to explain to delay to deadline as I was in the process of receiving advice which wasn’t much help. When that deadline was done I then called again to delay the deadline as I’m struggling financially and it’s lot of money they are asking for and I tried to dispute the cost to which they said okay we will delay it another 7 days for you to dispute the cost but I asked them how do I dispute this to you or Sainsbury’s and they said “we can’t advise you on this matter” I’ve read a lot of threads saying to ignore them but I was unsure now as I’ve made contact and have tried to dispute the payment and pay it which might mean I have admitted. Would they just persist harder and take me to court eventually or file for a ccj.   I would like to ignore them still but I would like to send a strong email so they know I’m clued up and then ignore them. I also want to pay the reasonable amount and get this matter solved. any advice on the law or similar situations are helpful when I called them I asked for an itemised bill. £101 stolen goods  ( supposedly caught me because they watched me on cctv over the duration of the week) also why did they not stop me in the first day. £20.40 recovered goods £150 security costs     Thank you 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

harry--Lloyds WON they send me 2 letters


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6147 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i have received 2 letters, both dated 4th july from LLoyds solistor's on the same day, that is this saturday the 7th.

here is what the letter says

THE LETTER IS DATE 4TH JULY FROM THERE SOLICITORS.

As you will be aware from our open letter, we act for Lloyds TSB Bank plc. This letter is marked 'without prejudice' and is 'confidential' which means it will not be produced in court, and is confidential between you , us and the bank. Therefore, you are required NOT to show this letter to anyone or reproduce it in any way that compromises the parties when entering settlement negotiations.

You are already aware that the bank intends to defend these proceeding on the grounds that the legal basis for your claim is incorrect.

1. As a matter of law, weather or not a clause providing for a payment is a penalty only arises where there has been a breach of contract.

2. When you asked the bank to make payment from your account that would have caused you to exceed any overdraft you had previously agreed with it, you were requesting it to agree to a new or higher overdraft. Your request to the bank to make a payment was not a breach of contract; nor were you in breach of contract when the bank either agreed to make that payment, or declined to do so.

3. The bank was entitled to charge a fee fro, amongst other things, urgently considering your request and for telling you it had agreed to it;alternatively for telling you it had not been agreed to it and returning the payment through the clearing system.

4. you were aware of the existence and amount of the fees that the bank charged for these services, and they were properly due under the contract between you and the bank.

5. your claim for repayment of these fees is therefore misconceived.

As you have read, the bank, together with other major banks, is presently discussing the legal basis for these charges with the office of fair trading. The bank considers it unhelpful to pre-empt the outcome of those discussions by requiring the court to adjudicate on a particular claim. especially because the legal and other costs involved can easily exceed the amount in issue regardless of who "wins" at the end of the day. This is as true for you as it is for the bank.

Accordingly, the Bank is, without prejudice to the position set out above, willing to pay you the £87.80 you are claiming by the way of bank charges and interest of £0.33p plus court fees of £30.00 in the full and final settlement of your claim.

This will be paid on the following basis:-

1. the above amounts(£118.13 in total) will be credited to your account 30-98-91 ********** by the bank.

2. The payment will be made solely as a goodwill gesture, without any admission as to any liability, and in full and final settlement of your claim.

3. you confirm that you have paid the above charges in full and that you have not already:

a. made a previous successful claim against the bank for any of them.

b. had any of them transferred into personal loan, credit card, or any other form of finance with the bank, which has then been written off;

c. had them written off as a result of charges to your overdraft;

d. had any of them refunded through discussion with any LTSB member of staff ( e.g. in the branch or telephone banking)

4. The terms of this agreement are confidential to the parties and their legal representatives.

5. You agree in future to maintain your accounts with the bank within your agreed limits and accordance with the terms that govern the account.

6. You are aware you can avoid these fees in future if you agree an increase in your overdraft with the bank before you try and make payments that wound take over any previously agreed limits. If you do not do so, you will again incur these charges.

7. You make contact with your local Lloyds TSB branch manager on 0845 3000 000 to arrange a review of your account. The bank wishes to avoid further situation , which give rise to disputes. A review may be useful to consider whether your current banking arrangements are the most appropriate for your needs. you should be aware that bank may withdraw benefits enjoyed with your account, such as using ATMs or debit cards when you are over any agreed limit.

Please let us know whether you are prepared to settle the matter on these term. if so, the bank will arrange to credit the above amount to your ************* account.

 

If you are willing to settle on this basis, please sign a copy of this letter as confirmation that you are bound by its terms , and return it to us as soon as possible. We must ask you to reply within 10 (ten) days from the date of this letter as the bank will need to file it's defence, if settlement terms cannot be agreed before then.

 

yours faithfully

 

 

the second letter says that the bank ding these proceedings on the following grounds:

1. the fees that you seek are properly incorporated into your contract with the bank: and

2. By making payments from your acount .....bha bha bha.

Looking ahead, which gives rise toa dispute is not one the bank wishes to continue. In view of this you are requested , please , to make contact within the next 14 days with your local TSB branch manage. BHa bha bha.

so do i except this and sign there form above, and i want to also claim the time wasting from the bank.

please advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same letters. I ignored them as they had already paid the charges plus courts fees back into bank account!!

Abbey - £539 pending - !!!WON!!!

Halifax - £676 pending - stayed at court

2nd Claim with Halifax - £168 pending

Lloyds TSB - £780 (sisters) !!!WON!!! - Filed waste of costs order (on hold)

Barclays - Barclays filed crap defense - on hold

 

AND THE BANKS ARE STILL CHARGING!!!!!!!

 

How very dare you!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received the same 2 letters and would also like to know if I should agree to the terms of the offer as outlined above. I also filed my court claim in liverpool county court but the letter indicates the case is going to Northampton county court. Why is this???????

Come on the mighty reds!!!!!!

 

Lloyds TSB - Success - 14/7/07

Lloyds TSB - Pending -

Halifax - Pending -

 

 

Tip my scales if I have been of assistance :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations!!:D :D

To reject the conditions (this will do no harm to your claim and you will still get your money) send a letter similar to this one:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bcard-woolwich-successes/48032-jakena-barclays-4.html?highlight=acceptance#post718754

 

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

can any one advice me.

I am going to write a letter 2 Lloyds excepting the full and final offer with out there term and condition..

Using template from this forum.

do I have 2 inform the court myself by writing a letter or sending the notice of issue latter ?

I am then going to apply for 'wasted cost order" by Formal application on N244.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...