Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Single mum vs. Alliance & Leicester


cluel3ss
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6184 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya's,

 

I have sent off the letters, they replied saying I wasnt entitled to anything, then I started a claim on HMCS. Bank have now sent me a letter from there solicitors saying that they are going to defend(Acknowledgement of Service) and also same day I recieved a letter from bank offering me £984 this has a limited time on it(20th July 2007), the total charges I am claiming is £4,995 + £120 court fees, I don't want to accept this offer, but I dont know what to do now, do I wait till the 28days are up for the bank to put forward a defence? or is this just to scare me? What do I do when the time period is up?

 

My claim was issued on the 15th June 2007

Court sent it to defendant by 1st class post on the 15th June 2007 and it was deemed to be served on the 20th June 2007

The bank had till the 4th July 2007 to reply, they replied as I said above, so do I now add 14 days to the 4th July 2007?

 

Should I ring the bank and tell them that I'm not accepting their unfair offer, or do nothing?

 

Many, many thanks, any help is greatly appreciated :-)

 

cluel3ss

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main advice seems to be, do nothing by phone, just deal with everybody by post using either Recorded delivery or 'Special Delivery', also keep a copy of everything you send.

 

There is a letter for rejecting offers in the Templates section.

 

Need any more help, just shout. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main advice seems to be, do nothing by phone, just deal with everybody by post using either Recorded delivery or 'Special Delivery', also keep a copy of everything you send.

 

There is a letter for rejecting offers in the Templates section.

 

Need any more help, just shout. :)

 

 

Many thanks squarebob :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go to the Templates section, scroll down the list, 3rd from the bottom should read; Rejecting Offers by jonni2bad, open it up and away you go.

 

If not, try this site. Reclaim Unfair Charges from banks & credit card companies!

 

Also spend some time (as I do) following all the different threads etc, every one has been somewhere at some stage at some time and they all have a story to tell.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you use the letter that is for an offer from the bank ( not solicitor)

 

If you see my thread I was advised to send the cheque back ( not accept as a partial offer) as I had commenced action ( very difficult!)Apparently this is because they may infer that you had accepted the monies as a full and final offer.

 

I also added on mine that I would have appreciated a breakdown of how they came to their offer- as I had sent a schedule of my claim:D

 

I also sent a copy to the solicitor so they were all in the picture.

 

When I get the details of the court for my hearing I willl send them a copy - as I have read of cases where the banks had not told the courts that an interim offer had been refused.

 

Jansus:)

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hy Jansus,

 

Just been looking thru your message, interesting bit about the partial offers we receive & reject. Mine arrived near enough the same time as their defence papers. And section 18 of their defence says; However, without prejudice to the above, the Defendant will refund and/or has refunded the Claimant's account part of each failed transaction fee to the extent of any excess above a debited charge of £12 per item. No word of dismay or otherwise from A&L re sending back their cheque, they must still know where I live because my statements still turn up on the doorstep.

 

I filed my A.Q today, decided to 'act soft' and send A&L a copy plus the attachments with an updated list of charges just to see if they need nudging.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

got my confirmation that hearing has been transferred to Aylesbury - no AQ and no date or request for documents yet.

Here we go then:D

 

jansus

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

got my confirmation that hearing has been transferred to Aylesbury - no AQ and no date or request for documents yet.

Here we go then:D

 

jansus

 

 

Hiya's

 

Ooo good luck, got my fingers n toes crossed, lol well everything that can be crossed. Lets hope it dont even get to court:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

check my last post today on my thread- we are waiting to hear about the A&L case.

 

Jan:)

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hy Pet,

 

Just do what I did; read it, scratch your head, then put it away and just await the arrival of your A.Q etc from the court. In between have a look at Alice- Rose's thread, she has posted a copy of Wragge's defence, compare yours with hers, and let her know how your copy differs.

 

Have a good day

 

Squarebob :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hy Pet,

 

Just do what I did; read it, scratch your head, then put it away and just await the arrival of your A.Q etc from the court. In between have a look at Alice- Rose's thread, she has posted a copy of Wragge's defence, compare yours with hers, and let her know how your copy differs.

 

Have a good day

 

Squarebob :)

 

 

Hiya's :)

 

LOL that comment about scratching your head made me laugh, a BIG ty for cheering me up after such a crappy morning (didn't think i woud get defence papers yet). Basically what they are saying in Defence papers is that i agreed to the charges being applied to my account, when i opened the account(T&C) blah blah (thats what i have to say to that lol), they have even listed what they charge for OD, Bounced cheques and so on, there only defence at the moment is that i haven't sent off my list of charges to solicitors, So i'm going to do that and send a copy to the court, the court can then see that some weeks the bank took so much of my money that i didn't even have enough to feed my kids or pay any bills, which got me deeper into debt and caused me to get an ulcer from worrying myself sick, anyways rant over lol, wow i feel better :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Chuck,

 

Stay 'Cool'. A&L really do know how and who to hurt, it's nothing personal, machines don't have feelings or common sense. Just imagine if machines really did rule the world!

 

Been right where you have, every penny swallowed up, ring them up, talk to a person, who might make the right noises, but at the end of the day, couldn't give a monkeys. And they talk about a 'Duty of Care' to their customers!

 

Squarebob :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Chuck,

 

Stay 'Cool'. A&L really do know how and who to hurt, it's nothing personal, machines don't have feelings or common sense. Just imagine if machines really did rule the world!

 

Been right where you have, every penny swallowed up, ring them up, talk to a person, who might make the right noises, but at the end of the day, couldn't give a monkeys. And they talk about a 'Duty of Care' to their customers!

 

Squarebob :)

 

Hiya's :)

 

Thank-you Squarebob, yes very scary thought if machines ruled the world. Yes like my grandad used to say, you are just a number not a living breathing person, my grandad didnt like banks, now i think i know why lol, he used to hide his money round the house, rather than keep it in a bank, he definately had the right idea!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

as I am just in front of you time- wise so keep reading my thread - I have received notification of no AQ so proceedure is slightly different -

 

what is the context that you have seen CMI sheet ? on a document you have received - can you let us know and will try and find out for you.

 

Jansus:)

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

check my last post today on my thread- we are waiting to hear about the A&L case.

 

Jan:)

 

 

Hiya's hun :)

 

I read through your last post, hopefully you will hear before court date, i read that someone got an offer of full amount 2hrs before court hearing was to start. Grrrrrrrrrr @ banks not even bothering to turn up for court, just goes to show that the greedy monkeys (that is being polite) really are the **** on the bottom of a stinky fish pond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

as I am just in front of you time- wise so keep reading my thread - I have received notification of no AQ so proceedure is slightly different -

 

what is the context that you have seen CMI sheet ? on a document you have received - can you let us know and will try and find out for you.

 

Jansus:)

 

Hiya's hun :)

 

I clicked on the link from your post, Leeds Mercantile Court Hearing 28th June 2007. As i was reading through this thread i noticed that they mention a CPR 59 Case management information sheet (CMI sheet)and that it should be submitted at least 7 days before court hearing, sorry i didnt put the CPR 59 bit in :( , i was just wondering what this is? I have not seen this on any other threads i have read.

 

Ahhh after reading a little more it is for 'Mercantile Court Guide'

 

Sorry for confusion.

 

Many thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the mercantile court system is different - the reason i have referred to it in posts as it gives people a chance to read about how many banks as you say are settling on the "doorstep" and also what the court experience is like. There are also lots of useful link backs to other information.

 

Jansus:)

  • Haha 1

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep out of the 'Deep-End' of the pool. Stay at the shallow end, and as your claim progresses, then move into deeper waters. Too much info now, just makes for a 'Sore Head'. I know, I've gone white overnight with all this info.

 

:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep out of the 'Deep-End' of the pool. Stay at the shallow end, and as your claim progresses, then move into deeper waters. Too much info now, just makes for a 'Sore Head'. I know, I've gone white overnight with all this info.

 

:)

 

 

true to a certain extent - but pre-warned is pre-armed - and things change from day to day - and after all the hard work and research you dont want to miss anything or rely on others to put you right:) :)

 

And distinguished grey rather than white sounds better:D

 

 

 

jansus

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Janus,

 

White looks better and more authoritive. Remember Dr Who?

 

You are right, pre-warned is pre-armed, what I meant was that when you first start on this road, you are an absolute novice re things legal and there is an awful lot of info to take onboard, but gradually as time and your claim progresses, then you can sort the 'wheat from the chaff', and things suddenly become clearer. I am now using the extra time left over to just go over everything and keeping an eye on things as they develop.

 

Squarebob

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...