Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

refund to 'outstanding balance'.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6208 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having got charges back,Barclaycard will not pay by cheque as 'I currently have an outstanding balance'...Is there any 'stronger' letter that I can write other than my request for them to pay me by cheque as it is my money!! which they haqve said no to!?

Thank you in advance

jane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they credited the money to your account, and the overdraft swallowed much of it, there's nothing you can really do to force the issue. A court would agree that they have paid the money back as required.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been offered a refund of £1700 by HSBC, but no longer have an account with them. I had a loan with HSBC with which I had difficulty repaying. That loan was placed in the hands of a collection agency 2 years ago and I now make regular monthly payments to reduce that loan. HSBC have stated that the cheque would be paid direct to the collection agency to reduce that debt now held by the agency.

 

If the debt is now with an agency, can HSBC force me to pay the agency with the refunded bank charges?

 

Thank you for any assistance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they intend paying what is effectively a third party, then I do not see this as fair play, just a manipulation of the process. I'd write to them by Recorded Delivery, putting them on notice that should they wish to pay the DCA that is their concern, but will NOT discharge their obligation to you

 

Since it was their choice to pass the matter to the DCA, it would be an unreasonable action of theirs to effectively pay their 'agent' rather than you. The difficulty as I see it is they agreed to the refund without court intervention, and will refuse to pay you if you do not accept their proposal, so you action remains as before, and may have to institute court action to force repayment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Buzby for your earlier reply and clearing that up for me....

I have just returned home and was about to ask a similar question to the one above...so I feel you have answered part of my question already!!( what supreme service..lol)

I have just submitted a claim via MCOL for refund from HSBC, an outstanding debt is on the account, which is closed with the HSBC,this debt is now with a DCA called Interim Justica .The charges are double what I owe, and therefore with your advice hoped I would at least be able to get the remainder paid directly to myself. I have been paying off the outstanding debt via a Debt Repayment plan. Now, I have claimed back the charges in my name only ( my partner left me with £20,000 of debt and four young children,!) and as I was working the bank pursued myself for the debt. It has just occured to me that there was an Access card issued on the account...but I know it's in my ex-partners name...(the only one that was!!) and I am sure there is an outstanding balance on it....

I would just like to know whether HSBC are able to use the outstanding amount that I was hoping (really, really hoping !) I would receive to pay that debt also???

very many thanks

jane

Link to post
Share on other sites

I(f your bank account/loan was in joint names, then there is a slight possibility that they could use part of the refund and roll it up into your partner's CC account, but if you've no contact, it might be a good idea to seek a 'disassociation' from him on your credit file, especially if he's moved on to other fields.

 

I'm assuming this would be the same bank's CC (Mastercard?)? If there was no formal marriage, it makes it easier to check your file and sever this link - you may be asked to present evidence of his departure from the household, which can be hard to do, but the bottom line is NOT to let them distribute any repayments, that way you stay in control.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Buzby,

 

I will write to request a copy of my credt files.

No marriage, ex moved out approx three years ago, and is in rehab....He came off the joint tenancy this Feb.

The Access card was issued along with the account.

HSBC have totally ignored me so far, .... the claim is at the aknowledgement stage. I did not add payment requested by cheque in my POC, but,

I have added a note and sent it with soc to DG Solicitors requesting to be paid by cheque.,do I need to insist now that the charges are not distributed upon refund or see what they say when they finally make an offer?

 

Thank you so much for your help.

jane

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep your gunpowder dry, see what they say in the interim, and if they seem to be leading you toward an account credit, explain that would not be satisfactory. You don't have to explain why. Let's see how they play it, as it might not be the problem you fear! All the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar situation with tsb, they paid £750 as a gesture of "goodwill" into my account and most of it was swallowed up by charges. I contacted financial ombudsman who said it is their view that the customer should benefit from any such payment and by doing this tsb were being naughty. I have made a formal complaint and fos are now dealing with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have been offered a refund of unlawful bank charges and have an outstanding balance with that entity such as a loan it is possible to negotiate sensibly with the bank.

 

For example if you are offered £2000 refund but you have an outstanding balance of say - £5000 - the bank will offer you the refund on the condition that they pay it to the loan account or the agent of the loan account.

 

One should attempt to negotiate with a letter that clearly segregates the loan from the bank charges. If the you have an agreed re-payment plan in place you are legally honoring you part of the bargain to repay that loan under that current agreement.

 

You should offer say a 33/66 split in your favour or a 50/50 split of the refund. This places the banks in a difficult position to say no - as you are willing to meet them part of the way - any magistrate would see this as a fair and reasonable attempt on your part to 'play ball'.

 

Obviously this is looked at on a case by case basis by the bank and may often depend on the long term relationship you have had with the bank - but its worth a try - once they offered what they've offered its unlikely that they will then take it to court as this is an expense to them - try to negotiate for part payments to you and them - sometimes it works - sometimes it doesn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...