Jump to content


Appeal for price comparisons in space & time


Mistermind
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6138 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The Irish Tand C for Bank Of Ireland, Ulster Bank and AIB are probably the most relevant.

This is because they also have interests in Northeren Ireland (AIB known as First Trust bank).

If you could get fee rates for each, from "both sides of the border" it would definitely strengthen case, since charges in Northern Ireland are just set at similar level to other banks.

How can they argue that it costs less to process these "services" in Republic of Ireland than in Northern.

The difference in cost to customer is startling !!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I dont know whether we can translate Austrailian price charges as being relevant to the argument.

I still believe that Bank of Ireland , AIB and Ulster Bank are the best examples of banks that essentially have interests in "mainland UK" , Northern Ireland and the Eire, where they all offer high street banking.

One could question whether Uk (including Northern Ireland) are subsidsing the rates paid by customers in Eire.

Also I think that there have been numerous investigations by authorities in Eire into the ways customers were being overchargedhttp://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:f6awEyuIGvUJ:dev.rte.ie/news/2004/0507/aib.html+AIB+investigation+Irish&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=uk.

Why is it that the authorities in Eire can set out a maximum charge and the FSA are unable to do so here.

Surely if the UK banks are arguing that hese charges cover the cost of processing in Uk (with interests in Eire), then good business sense would dictate the need to switch their processeing units to Eire?

Furthmore, if it is found that there is a profit being made from them (I believe that the competition Commission found that some 12% of Northern Irelands "big 4" banks profit came from charges), and that profit is being "hidden" is that then fraud?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Senior inspectors from the Irish Financial Services Regulatory Authority have begun an investigation at the AIB headquarters in Ballsbridge, Dublin.

They are carrying out a detailed inquiry into the overcharging of foreign exchange customers.

Details of how the bank calculated the excess revenue of €14 million and how it will identify customers affected will be sought as part of the process.

Advertisement

 

IFSRA has also confirmed that it has written to other financial institutions requesting them to verify that the charges they apply to customers are within the maximum levels notified to the regulator.

Meanwhile, Sinn Féin Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin, a member of the Oireachtas Finance and Public Service Committee, said he had written to its chairperson to ask that representatives of AIB be recalled before the committee on the overcharging issue.

Speaking on RTÉ Radio, Deputy John McGuinness, another member of the committee, said if the bank could not identify from which customers some money had come, then that money should be paid to the State.

Earlier, Tánaiste Mary Harney added her voice to concerns over the failure of the AIB bank to act quickly to rectify the error.

Ms Harney said the onus was now on AIB to identify the customers who were overcharged.

Union expresses disappointment

Earlier, the union that represents banking staff, the IBOA, said it was disappointed at what it called AIB's attempt to blame junior staff for the overcharging.

The union's General Secretary, Larry Broderick, said the revelation would be viewed by many as another damning indictment of the Irish banking industry, and he called for an independent investigation.

Software problem

The Managing Director of AIB, Donal Forde, said that executives at the bank had never been briefed on the software problem that caused the overcharging.

Mr Forde said that the problem was known about at a departmental level two and a half years ago and a report was being prepared. However, Mr Forde said that AIB's executive management team had not been alerted until Tuesday. He said that it was regrettable that there had been such a delay.

Mr Forde said the excessive rate was applied from 1995, and was in line with that charged by the bank's competitors, but AIB now accepted that it was illegal.

 

icon_printable.gif printable version

icon_mail.gif send to a friend

 

Audio & Video

Link to post
Share on other sites

National Irish Bank admits they overcharged

 

Auditors find weaknesses in internal control

 

by Kyran Fitzgerald

National Irish Bank have admitted overcharging customers in a report following a three-month investigation by the bank's auditors, which also supports suspicions of tax evasion.

Internal auditors carried out the investigation for its parent company, National Australia Bank, into the sale and marketing of investment products in association with the Isle of Man-based group, CMI.

In what amounts to an important climbdown, Graham Savage, the chief executive of National Irish Bank and Northern Bank, said the team of auditors found weaknesses in internal controls in the bank at the time of the launch of the CMI products in 1991.

He added that in a significant minority of cases the auditors could not decide from the documents available the priority of the transactions. However, Mr Savage stood by the bank's insistence it had not acted with an ulterior motive. Financial experts say Mr Savage has conceded that investments in CMI products could have involved tax evasion. A total of £33m was invested in CMI Personal Portfolio products, and the bank charged heavy commission for this service.

The affair is now the subject of investigations by the Central Bank, the Revenue Commissioners, the Department of Enterprise and Employment and two High Court appointed Inspectors.

Mr Savage said the bank failed to achieve the operational standards it would have wished and it could have managed the marketing of its product better. He criticised the lack of proper brochure material, but said the bank's only intention was to market an investment product and not with the aim of helping customers evade tax. The bank had an established relationship with CMI; all the necessary documents had been completed and there was no evidence of fictitious names and addresses. However, he admitted in some cases the propriety of the transactions had not been established.

"The bank does not shrink from its responsibility with respect to this product. It recognises that even one account which causes concern is one account too many. Its own internal investigation remains open while this process is continuing," he said. Mr Savage did not indicate whether CMI/NIB customers would be compensated where there was any evidence of overcharging.

A statement containing the bank's response to the wider controversy of overcharging of ordinary National Irish Bank customers would be made in due course.

Mr Savage declined to indicate whether any sanctions would be taken against bank executives working in the bank at the time the CMI products were launched.

"A lot of investigations are still ongoing. Should any issues arise they will be dealt with through the bank's normal procedures," he said.

A spokesman added that it had still to be established that the bank had grounds to act against anybody.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was not having a go , but cannot believe that most people on Cag would not be that knowledgeable.

Ah did you like so many others (friends of Mr Bally) ask if a passport was needed (true story).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm , I think that the British public and the world at large were fed a lot of bull by the media and the government during "the troubles"

When I lived in England no-one could belive that we were in a "mixed relationship", that ordinary people went about ordinary lives, our schools best in UK.

They couldnt believe that in the majority , we lived happily alongside one another, that we had friends, relatives and marriages of differing religious perspectives.

Everyone, I met had an opinion on Northern Ireland, and yet none had visited (Honestly, one of the most beautiful places on Gods Green earth).

Don't forget that the government had to justify why the nations young men and women were being murdered in what should have been a United Nation Peace Keeping Role.

Of course the people in Dublin are optimistic (partly to do with Celtic Tiger).

Since 1998,(when "peace "broke out) the number of Mainland tourists visiting Northern Ireland has increased and most have been charmed by Northern Ireland and its people.

In my small seaside village, we are overwhelmed with people from Uk having second homes or moving here permanently.

 

We still have very cr*ap banks though.lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...