Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

6 year limit


Azazal23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think in the first instance i will tot up the charges and send them the initial letter. I wont make an issue of the 6 year limit until they do,

 

yes, I think that this is the correct approach. Please keep me informed. It would be very significant if this claim went through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding this business of defaults, what exactly is meant by that term?

 

If it refers to a bank having imposed these penalty charges and reflecting them on a Person's Credit File, does this part of the limitation act allow you to go back further than the six years if you are not scared to give it a go and see this run to the full blown defended action in a Court of Law? Or is a Default a seperate issue from the Penalty Charges we are arguing for the return of at the moment?

Dealing with the default is very difficult. however, as the charges are a good proportion of the debt, maybe you stand a chance. We'll see.

 

For the moment, your problem is that you have a default which was entered nearly 6 years ago. This then must refer to charges which are applied over a period of time some of them more than 6 years old. Under the normal limitation rules, the claims are time-barred once they are older than 6 years.

 

However - Limitation Act 1980

32.--

  • (1) .... where in the case of any action for which a period of limitation is prescribed by this Act, either-
    • (a) the action is based upon the fraud of the defendant; or
    • (b) any fact relevant to the plaintiff's right of action has been deliberately concealed from him by the defendant; or
    • © the action is for relief from the consequences of a mistake;

    [*]the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake (as the case may be) or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it. ....

    [*](2) For the purposes of subsection (1) above, deliberate commission of a breach of duty in circumstances in which it is unlikely to be discovered for some time amounts to deliberate concealment of the facts involved in that breach of duty. . . .

I don't know if I need to explain the effect of this to you. The bank would certainly get excited about it as they would realise that this would open up claims for charges going back to the dinosaurs.

 

It all depends whether you are up for it - and of course whether it would work.

 

Fobbing you off with merely "we think the charges are fair and reasonable blah blah " if in fact they are not amounts in my view to deliberate concealment.

Once again it is experimental. it could take you into some serious litigation.

What I can say is that with the McNamara sound-file we have in the library, Lloyd's are the easiest target in this whole business. I hope that their lawyers read this.

 

You have to decide what you want to do. Do youhave all the details going back that far?

I do have bank details for lloyds going back 12 years and would very much like to hear more info on this matter. Sorry to be a dumb sod over the niceties and definitions but I want to see if it fits my circumstances and would be very interested to give things a go if they do. Not just for Lloyds but also Barclays as well ( and a few other financial institutions I have had dealings with if the various sub sections quoted apply...

all ideas and information exchanged willingly, bounce the ideas around,it helps everyone at the end of the day, good luck to you all and God Bless...LoL Graham & Yvonne

Link to post
Share on other sites

A default is where the bank registers that you have not kept to a credit agreement with them - regulated by the CCA 1974.

 

Often that refers to an overdraft. however, if that overdraft is comprised of penalty charges and there are an invalid debt, it has to follow that to register this with the CRA is incorrect and actually defamatory as it damages your reputation in regards of a debt which doesn't exist.

I'm not sure what yo mean by the rest of the question but could we run this in a separate thread if it is going to develop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82
As I understand it defaults remain on the file for 6 years from the date they are settled, not the date they are put on your file.

 

No, defaults start from the day they were registered on your file, even if you only pay it off on the 5th yr 364th day it will still be removed on the last day.

 

Settled or not it will still be removed on the last day (6th year) but it will be very difficult to obtain credit whlist it is still outstanding

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes a default is a formal record noting that you have failed to comply with the terms of an agreement. The CCJ is a means by which the creditor tries to force you to pay any amounts due under the agreement. They are two completely separate things and both do enormous damage to your credit report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Sifting through my statements and one thing is apparent - when i am being charges for O/Draft usage Fee ( i didnt have one) there different amounts each month

£39

£9

£36

£45

£24

£6

 

and so on, are they allowed to do this, i thought it was supposed to be a transparent set fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Calculated the Chrages they are as follows

 

Total Paid Charges

 

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £39.00 09/02/1998

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £9.00 09/03/1998

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £36.00 09/04/1998

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £36.00 08/05/1998

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £45.00 09/06/1998

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £24.00 09/07/1998

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £39.00 07/08/1998

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £6.00 09/09/1998

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £32.00 09/10/1998

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £30.00 09/11/1998

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £15.00 09/03/1999

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £50.00 09/04/1999

 

£361.00 Interest at 8% £223.78

Total = £584.78

 

This represents total charges that i actually paid before the charges and my account got out of control.

 

First thing you will notice that it does not fall within the specifc 6 year limit.

This is the first obsticle.

 

Any comments anyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

These are the charges i did not pay, eventually my account was defaulted.

 

In Respect of: Amount Date Incurred Interest

 

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £50.00 07/05/1999

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £60.00 09/06/1999 £0.60

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £55.00 09/07/1999 £4.34

UNPAID DD £27.50 09/07/1999

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £5.00 09/08/1999 £20.16

UNPAID DD £27.50 09/08/1999

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £5.00 09/09/1999 £51.46

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £5.00 08/10/1999 £72.22

UNPAID DD £82.50 08/10/1999

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £5.00 09/11/1999 £69.17

UNPAID DD £82.50 09/11/1999

UNPAID DD £82.50 09/12/1999 £77.60

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £5.00 09/12/1999

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £5.00 07/01/2000 £74.94

UNPAID DD £27.50 07/01/2000

UNPAID DD £27.50 09/02/2000 £75.71

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £5.00 09/02/2000

UNPAID DD £27.50 09/03/2000 £88.54

UNPAID DD £27.50 07/04/2000 £79.85

OVERDRAFT USAGE FEE £5.00 07/04/2000

18/04/2000 TRANS TO CDR £4,541.41

18/04/2000 Closing Balance

 

 

£617.50 £614.59

£1,232.09

 

 

As i get further and further overdrawn, the bank seems to lower the charge or unauth overdraft to just £5 becuase they are making so much on the interest.

 

Given the 6 year limit how do you think i should proceed,

 

Step 1 just try and apply for the charges i have actually paid to be refunded. and see what they say.

 

Step 2 . They defulted me 19/4/2000 - do they have to give you notice they are goin to default youre account? Anyway have have been in touch with Equifax and had the entry removed. There is also a CCJ 15/09/2000 £4,739 - which expires in Sept.

 

Any advice would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/06/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...