Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Refusal to carry, Canadian Affair, My Travel Airways and Thomas Cook Airlines


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughters live in Canada. I made arrangements to have them flown to the UK for a visit with www.canadianaffair.com. Although their adult age begins at 15 they have instructed me over the phone in the past to simply book my children over the web putting the eldest in the adult bracket, this has happened four times in the past, and the younger as a child as normal. I did that this time too, and the booking was confirmed. Their mother called to make arangements for pre-booking their seats, explaining that they were 12 and 14 and traveling alone. The airline took her money and pre-booked the seats. When they arrived at the airport to check in they were refused. The company claimed that it was against their policy. I checked the booking conditions. there is nothing about age restrictions there. I called the UK customer service number, while my children were at the airport, and they refused to help, despite having carried the children in the past after booking in this way, explaining that the policy has changed recently. I am now £1500 pounds out of pocket for the new flights I had to purchase plus other expenses and Canadian affair refuse to even refund the original ticket cost. Is this legal? Is there anything I can do to recoup the cost of the tickets that they refused to honour? The flights were with My Travel Airways and Thomas Cook Airlines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is something that has changed recently and Im not so sure if the ruling has come from the Airline regulators.

 

Have you looked at the booking terms and conditions ?

 

Have you got anything in writing to support your enquiries?

 

Maybe theres a case for breach of contract.

 

First port of call I think is the agent you booked with as this should have been pointed out there.

 

Anyone else any suggestions ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive just found this

 

http://www.aol.handbag.com/travel/advicefortravellers/kidsflying/

 

 

 

It says that there is NO legislation in force about this.

Looks like its down to individual policy and My travel (Thomas cooks Airline )

have decided its not their policy.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again I also have a link to an Airline staff forum.

 

Maybe someone on there could advise you ?

 

http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=227368

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is down to the airline to decide what their Unaccmpanied Minor policy is, if indeed they decide to carry them at all. You may find that this cost was too dear for the charter airlines you mentioned and that a scheduled airline would be a better bet in future.

 

Some airlines restrict UM's to 1 per flight.

 

That being said, they still agreed to your booking and as long as you have proof that you put the ages in the web booking at the time of booking, then you should have a case to put to them.

 

You might want to copy in the CAA also as all policies are checked by them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...